REVIEW 5 cited by
A survey on domain adaptation theory: learning bounds and theoretical guarantees
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A survey on domain adaptation theory: learning bounds and theoretical guarantees
read the original abstract
All famous machine learning algorithms that comprise both supervised and semi-supervised learning work well only under a common assumption: the training and test data follow the same distribution. When the distribution changes, most statistical models must be reconstructed from newly collected data, which for some applications can be costly or impossible to obtain. Therefore, it has become necessary to develop approaches that reduce the need and the effort to obtain new labeled samples by exploiting data that are available in related areas, and using these further across similar fields. This has given rise to a new machine learning framework known as transfer learning: a learning setting inspired by the capability of a human being to extrapolate knowledge across tasks to learn more efficiently. Despite a large amount of different transfer learning scenarios, the main objective of this survey is to provide an overview of the state-of-the-art theoretical results in a specific, and arguably the most popular, sub-field of transfer learning, called domain adaptation. In this sub-field, the data distribution is assumed to change across the training and the test data, while the learning task remains the same. We provide a first up-to-date description of existing results related to domain adaptation problem that cover learning bounds based on different statistical learning frameworks.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Equivalence of Coarse and Fine-Grained Models for Learning with Distribution Shift
An efficient black-box reduction from PQ to TDS learning for any Boolean concept class in the distribution-free setting implies hardness for TDS learning of halfspaces, while membership queries enable efficient PQ lea...
-
Equivalence of Coarse and Fine-Grained Models for Learning with Distribution Shift
PQ and TDS learning are equivalent in the distribution-free setting for Boolean classes, implying hardness for TDS halfspace learning but efficient algorithms with membership queries.
-
Corruptions of Supervised Learning Problems: Typology and Mitigations
The paper introduces a Markov kernel framework for exhaustively classifying corruptions in supervised learning and derives loss corrections for label, attribute, and joint cases by comparing clean and corrupted Bayes risks.
-
How Useful is Causal Invariance for Domain Adaptation in Finite-Sample Settings?
In linear regression for supervised domain adaptation, causal invariance yields finite-sample gains only when target-risk margins exceed estimation error, with matching upper and lower bounds derived and connected to ...
-
DataPrep-Bench: Benchmarking LLMs as Training Data Preparators
DataPrep-Bench jointly benchmarks data construction and data-quality evaluation for LLMs across six domains with downstream fine-tuning performance as ground truth.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.