Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Simple and Deep Graph Convolutional Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.02133 v1 pith:73FGMHYF submitted 2020-07-04 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords deepconvolutionalgcniigraphnetworksproblemgcnsmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Graph convolutional networks (GCNs) are a powerful deep learning approach for graph-structured data. Recently, GCNs and subsequent variants have shown superior performance in various application areas on real-world datasets. Despite their success, most of the current GCN models are shallow, due to the {\em over-smoothing} problem. In this paper, we study the problem of designing and analyzing deep graph convolutional networks. We propose the GCNII, an extension of the vanilla GCN model with two simple yet effective techniques: {\em Initial residual} and {\em Identity mapping}. We provide theoretical and empirical evidence that the two techniques effectively relieves the problem of over-smoothing. Our experiments show that the deep GCNII model outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on various semi- and full-supervised tasks. Code is available at https://github.com/chennnM/GCNII .

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 402 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. LLM4GNAS: A Large Language Model Based Toolkit for Graph Neural Architecture Search

    cs.LG 2025-02 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    This paper describes an LLM-driven graph neural architecture search toolkit whose performance claims are weakened by best-of-three reporting, unavailable code, and a false 'first work' statement.

Pith tools