Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Privacy in Targeted Advertising: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.06861 v3 pith:55FLJAGB submitted 2020-09-15 cs.CR

Privacy in Targeted Advertising: A Survey

classification cs.CR
keywords privacyadvertisingtargeteduserinformationprocessanalysisanalytics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Targeted advertising has transformed the marketing landscape for a wide variety of businesses, by creating new opportunities for advertisers to reach prospective customers by delivering personalised ads, using an infrastructure of a number of intermediary entities and technologies. The advertising and analytics companies collect, aggregate, process and trade a vast amount of user's personal data, which has prompted serious privacy concerns among both individuals and organisations. This article presents a detailed survey of the associated privacy risks and proposed solutions in a mobile environment. We outline details of the information flow between the advertising platform and ad/analytics networks, the profiling process, advertising sources and criteria, the measurement analysis of targeted advertising based on user's interests and profiling context and the ads delivery process, for both in-app and in-browser targeted ads; we also include an overview of data sharing and tracking technologies. We discuss challenges in preserving user privacy that include threats related to private information extraction and exchange among various advertising entities, privacy threats from third-party tracking, re-identification of private information and associated privacy risks. Subsequently, we present various techniques for preserving user privacy and a comprehensive analysis of the proposals based on such techniques; we compare the proposals based on the underlying architectures, privacy mechanisms and deployment scenarios. Finally, we discuss the potential research challenges and open research issues.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. PromptPET: Privacy-Utility Optimized Prompt Obfuscation

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    PromptPET selectively applies four obfuscation actions (including novel noising) via an OPRO-style rule optimizer to match single-action privacy-utility frontiers and outperform prior prompt-minimization methods on Wi...