Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

EGMM: an Evidential Version of the Gaussian Mixture Model for Clustering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.01333 v3 pith:7CDY3SLW submitted 2020-10-03 cs.LG stat.ML

EGMM: an Evidential Version of the Gaussian Mixture Model for Clustering

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords egmmclusteringevidentialdatasetgaussianmixturemodelproposed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Gaussian mixture model (GMM) provides a simple yet principled framework for clustering, with properties suitable for statistical inference. In this paper, we propose a new model-based clustering algorithm, called EGMM (evidential GMM), in the theoretical framework of belief functions to better characterize cluster-membership uncertainty. With a mass function representing the cluster membership of each object, the evidential Gaussian mixture distribution composed of the components over the powerset of the desired clusters is proposed to model the entire dataset. The parameters in EGMM are estimated by a specially designed Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm. A validity index allowing automatic determination of the proper number of clusters is also provided. The proposed EGMM is as simple as the classical GMM, but can generate a more informative evidential partition for the considered dataset. The synthetic and real dataset experiments show that the proposed EGMM performs better than other representative clustering algorithms. Besides, its superiority is also demonstrated by an application to multi-modal brain image segmentation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Amplitude Uncertainties Everywhere All at Once

    hep-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Compares ensemble, Bayesian, and evidential regression approaches for uncertainty quantification in amplitude surrogates and shows they detect localized training data issues.