Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Zero-Shot Stance Detection: A Dataset and Model using Generalized Topic Representations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.03640 v1 pith:N3FMFZQH submitted 2020-10-07 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords stancedetectionmodeltopicszero-shotcapturesdatasetgeneralized
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Stance detection is an important component of understanding hidden influences in everyday life. Since there are thousands of potential topics to take a stance on, most with little to no training data, we focus on zero-shot stance detection: classifying stance from no training examples. In this paper, we present a new dataset for zero-shot stance detection that captures a wider range of topics and lexical variation than in previous datasets. Additionally, we propose a new model for stance detection that implicitly captures relationships between topics using generalized topic representations and show that this model improves performance on a number of challenging linguistic phenomena.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantifying Political Partisanship for Cross-Platform Analyses

    cs.SI 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Partisanship of individual posts can be scored on a common embedding axis anchored by AllSides news-bias labels, yielding cross-platform scores that transfer from Bluesky/Truth Social to X.

  2. A More Advanced Group Polarization Measurement Approach Based on LLM-Based Agents and Graphs

    cs.CY 2024-11 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Group polarization is measured through a Community Sentiment Network built by a team of LLM agents, with a Community Opposition Index score; only the stance detection step is empirically tested.

Pith tools