REVIEW 2 cited by
Incentive Mechanism Design for Federated Learning: Hedonic Game Approach
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Incentive mechanism design is crucial for enabling federated learning. We deal with clustering problem of agents contributing to federated learning setting. Assuming agents behave selfishly, we model their interaction as a stable coalition partition problem using hedonic games where agents and clusters are the players and coalitions, respectively. We address the following question: is there a family of hedonic games ensuring a Nash-stable coalition partition? We propose the Nash-stable set which determines the family of hedonic games possessing at least one Nash-stable partition, and analyze the conditions of non-emptiness of the Nash-stable set. Besides, we deal with the decentralized clustering. We formulate the problem as a non-cooperative game and prove the existence of a potential game.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Stable and Budget-Feasible Coalition Formation for Clustered Federated Learning: A Hedonic Potential-Game Approach
Symmetric pairwise surplus allocations make clustered-FL coalition formation an exact potential game with budget-feasible Nash stability and slack-controlled welfare guarantees, validated on preregistered n=4 CIFAR-10...
-
Incentive-Compatible Federated Learning with Stackelberg Game Modeling
FLamma claims to balance fairness and accuracy in federated learning via a Stackelberg game with an adaptive decay factor, but the theory has derivation errors and the experiments use fixed local epochs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.