Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Simutaneously vanishing higher derived limits without large cardinals

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.06699 v1 pith:M6NLP6SQ submitted 2021-02-12 math.LO math.AT

classification math.LOmath.AT
keywords omegahighermathbfmathrmworkconsistentderivedextension
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

A question dating to Sibe Marde\v{s}i\'{c} and Andrei Prasolov's 1988 work Strong homology is not additive, and motivating a considerable amount of set theoretic work in the ensuing years, is that of whether it is consistent with the ZFC axioms for the higher derived limits $\mathrm{lim}^n$ $(n>0)$ of a certain inverse system $\mathbf{A}$ indexed by ${^\omega}\omega$ to simultaneously vanish. An equivalent formulation of this question is that of whether it is consistent for all $n$-coherent families of functions indexed by ${^\omega}\omega$ to be trivial. In this paper, we prove that, in any forcing extension given by adjoining $\beth_\omega$-many Cohen reals, $\mathrm{lim}^n \mathbf{A}$ vanishes for all $n > 0$. Our proof involves a detailed combinatorial analysis of the forcing extension and repeated applications of higher dimensional $\Delta$-system lemmas. This work removes all large cardinal hypotheses from the main result of arXiv:1907.11744 and substantially reduces the least value of the continuum known to be compatible with the simultaneous vanishing of $\mathrm{lim}^n \mathbf{A}$ for all $n > 0$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Merging $\lim^1 \mathbf{A} \ne 0$ with other nonvanishing constructions

    math.LO 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5 of 10

    It is consistent that b=d=ω_n and lim^k A ≠ 0 for all 1≤k≤n, and that b=d=ω_{ω+2} with lim^k A ≠ 0 for every k≥1, by new forcings for lim^1 A ≠ 0 compatible with prior nonvanishing methods.

Pith tools