pith. sign in

arxiv: 2107.06887 · v3 · pith:7QTMMGG7new · submitted 2021-07-14 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Predictions for local PNG bias in the galaxy power spectrum and bispectrum and the consequences for f_(rm NL) constraints

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords deltabiasgalaxyconstraintslesssimbispectrumlocalpower
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We use hydrodynamical separate universe simulations with the IllustrisTNG model to predict the local primordial non-Gaussianity (PNG) bias parameters $b_{\phi}$ and $b_{\phi\delta}$, which enter at leading order in the galaxy power spectrum and bispectrum. This is the first time that $b_{\phi\delta}$ is measured from either gravity-only or galaxy formation simulations. For dark matter halos, the popular assumption of universality overpredicts the $b_{\phi\delta}(b_1)$ relation in the range $1 \lesssim b_1 \lesssim 3$ by up to $\Delta b_{\phi\delta} \sim 3$ ($b_1$ is the linear density bias). The adequacy of the universality relation is worse for the simulated galaxies, with the relations $b_{\phi}(b_1)$ and $b_{\phi\delta}(b_1)$ being generically redshift-dependent and very sensitive to how galaxies are selected (we test total, stellar and black hole mass, black hole mass accretion rate and color). The uncertainties on $b_{\phi}$ and $b_{\phi\delta}$ have a direct, often overlooked impact on the constraints of the local PNG parameter $f_{\rm NL}$, which we study and discuss. For a survey with $V = 100{\rm Gpc}^3/h^3$ at $z=1$, uncertainties $\Delta b_{\phi} \lesssim 1$ and $\Delta b_{\phi\delta} \lesssim 5$ around values close to the fiducial can yield relatively unbiased constraints on $f_{\rm NL}$ using power spectrum and bispectrum data. We also show why priors on galaxy bias are useful even in analyses that fit for products $f_{\rm NL} b_{\phi}$ and $f_{\rm NL} b_{\phi\delta}$. The strategies we discuss to deal with galaxy bias uncertainties can be straightforwardly implemented in existing $f_{\rm NL}$ constraint analyses (we provide fits for some of the bias relations). Our results motivate more works with galaxy formation simulations to refine our understanding of $b_{\phi}$ and $b_{\phi\delta}$ towards improved constraints on $f_{\rm NL}$.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. How I stop worrying about non-universality and $b_\phi$: Constraining local $f_{\rm NL}$ with $b_\phi$ priors from HOD posteriors

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Constructs b_phi priors from HOD posteriors on DESI EDR data to recover unbiased f_NL even with assembly bias.

  2. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity from Quaia

    astro-ph.CO 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Reports f_NL = -20.5^{+19.0}_{-18.1} (68% CL) from combined Quaia quasar auto-correlation and CMB lensing cross-correlation assuming p_phi=1, or -28.7^{+26.1}_{-24.6} for p_phi=1.6.