REVIEW 1 cited by
The solar carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen abundances from a 3D LTE analysis of molecular lines
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen are the fourth, sixth, and third most abundant elements in the Sun. Their abundances remain hotly debated due to the so-called solar modelling problem that has persisted for almost $20$ years. We revisit this issue by presenting a homogeneous analysis of $408$ molecular lines across $12$ diagnostic groups, observed in the solar intensity spectrum. Using a realistic 3D radiative-hydrodynamic model solar photosphere and LTE (local thermodynamic equilibrium) line formation, we find $\log\epsilon_{C} = 8.47\pm0.02$, $\log\epsilon_{N} = 7.89\pm0.04$, and $\log\epsilon_{O} = 8.70\pm0.04$. The stipulated uncertainties mainly reflect the sensitivity of the results to the model atmosphere; this sensitivity is correlated between the different diagnostic groups, which all agree with the mean result to within $0.03$ dex. For carbon and oxygen, the molecular results are in excellent agreement with our 3D non-LTE analyses of atomic lines. For nitrogen, however, the molecular indicators give a $0.12$ dex larger abundance than the atomic indicators, and our best estimate of the solar nitrogen abundance is given by the mean: $7.83$ dex. The solar oxygen abundance advocated here is close to our earlier determination of $8.69$ dex, and so the present results do not significantly alleviate the solar modelling problem.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Is the composition of the Solar atmosphere unusual, and if so, why? Possible interpretations
A review of the 10-20% solar volatile-to-refractory excess relative to solar twins, weighing galactic, protoplanetary, and planetary-ingestion explanations and finding no decisive answer.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.