REVIEW 2 cited by
A Cautionary Tale of Decorrelating Theory Uncertainties
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A Cautionary Tale of Decorrelating Theory Uncertainties
read the original abstract
A variety of techniques have been proposed to train machine learning classifiers that are independent of a given feature. While this can be an essential technique for enabling background estimation, it may also be useful for reducing uncertainties. We carefully examine theory uncertainties, which typically do not have a statistical origin. We will provide explicit examples of two-point (fragmentation modeling) and continuous (higher-order corrections) uncertainties where decorrelating significantly reduces the apparent uncertainty while the actual uncertainty is much larger. These results suggest that caution should be taken when using decorrelation for these types of uncertainties as long as we do not have a complete decomposition into statistically meaningful components.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Local Conformal Predictions for Calibrated Surrogates
FALCON is a novel conformal prediction technique that learns locally calibrated confidence intervals for neural network surrogates modeling LHC scattering amplitudes.
-
Are We Ready for AI-Driven Discovery? AI Verification Before the Next Fundamental Physics Breakthrough
Verification of ML in fundamental physics is essential precisely when models enter statistical modeling, inference, or hypothesis testing, and is bounded by unavoidable inductive bias, sample complexity, and experimen...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.