Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Targeting Multi-Loop Integrals with Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.09145 v3 pith:HR6XJC3N submitted 2021-12-16 hep-ph

Targeting Multi-Loop Integrals with Neural Networks

classification hep-ph
keywords contourcomplexintegralsmulti-loopnumericalprecisionchosencombination
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Numerical evaluations of Feynman integrals often proceed via a deformation of the integration contour into the complex plane. While valid contours are easy to construct, the numerical precision for a multi-loop integral can depend critically on the chosen contour. We present methods to optimize this contour using a combination of optimized, global complex shifts and a normalizing flow. They can lead to a significant gain in precision.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Neural Control Variates at LO and NLO

    hep-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Signed neural control variates from normalizing flows, combined with neural importance sampling, reduce weight ranges and negative weights for LO and NLO phase-space integration and event generation.

  2. Local Conformal Predictions for Calibrated Surrogates

    hep-ph 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    FALCON is a novel conformal prediction technique that learns locally calibrated confidence intervals for neural network surrogates modeling LHC scattering amplitudes.

  3. Amplitude Uncertainties Everywhere All at Once

    hep-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Compares ensemble, Bayesian, and evidential regression approaches for uncertainty quantification in amplitude surrogates and shows they detect localized training data issues.