pith. sign in

arxiv: 2202.07650 · v1 · pith:LW4GK7DHnew · submitted 2022-02-15 · 💻 cs.LG

Conformal Prediction Sets with Limited False Positives

classification 💻 cs.LG
keywords conformalpredictionnumbercandidatescoveragefalsepositivessets
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We develop a new approach to multi-label conformal prediction in which we aim to output a precise set of promising prediction candidates with a bounded number of incorrect answers. Standard conformal prediction provides the ability to adapt to model uncertainty by constructing a calibrated candidate set in place of a single prediction, with guarantees that the set contains the correct answer with high probability. In order to obey this coverage property, however, conformal sets can become inundated with noisy candidates -- which can render them unhelpful in practice. This is particularly relevant to practical applications where there is a limited budget, and the cost (monetary or otherwise) associated with false positives is non-negligible. We propose to trade coverage for a notion of precision by enforcing that the presence of incorrect candidates in the predicted conformal sets (i.e., the total number of false positives) is bounded according to a user-specified tolerance. Subject to this constraint, our algorithm then optimizes for a generalized notion of set coverage (i.e., the true positive rate) that allows for any number of true answers for a given query (including zero). We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach across a number of classification tasks in natural language processing, computer vision, and computational chemistry.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Budgeted Act-or-Defer Multi-Agent LLM Deliberation with Local Reliability Bounds

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A kNN lower-confidence-bound approach for act-or-defer decisions in multi-agent LLM debates respects user-declared wrong-action budgets while achieving high automation rates on benchmarks.