REVIEW 1 cited by
As Little as Possible, as Much as Necessary: Detecting Over- and Undertranslations with Contrastive Conditioning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
As Little as Possible, as Much as Necessary: Detecting Over- and Undertranslations with Contrastive Conditioning
read the original abstract
Omission and addition of content is a typical issue in neural machine translation. We propose a method for detecting such phenomena with off-the-shelf translation models. Using contrastive conditioning, we compare the likelihood of a full sequence under a translation model to the likelihood of its parts, given the corresponding source or target sequence. This allows to pinpoint superfluous words in the translation and untranslated words in the source even in the absence of a reference translation. The accuracy of our method is comparable to a supervised method that requires a custom quality estimation model.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
$M^2PO$: Multi-Perspective Multi-Pair Preference Optimization for Machine Translation
M2PO combines a QE-plus-alignment reward with a dynamic curriculum and multi-pair DPO loss, and reports WMT21-22 gains for a 7B translation model, but the abstract's WMT23/24 9B parity claims are unsupported.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.