REVIEW 1 cited by
Fisher Forecasts for Primordial non-Gaussianity from Persistent Homology
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Fisher Forecasts for Primordial non-Gaussianity from Persistent Homology
read the original abstract
We study the information content of summary statistics built from the multi-scale topology of large-scale structures on primordial non-Gaussianity of the local and equilateral type. We use halo catalogs generated from numerical N-body simulations of the Universe on large scales as a proxy for observed galaxies. Besides calculating the Fisher matrix for halos in real space, we also check more realistic scenarios in redshift space. Without needing to take a distant observer approximation, we place the observer on a corner of the box. We also add redshift errors mimicking spectroscopic and photometric samples. We perform several tests to assess the reliability of our Fisher matrix, including the Gaussianity of our summary statistics and convergence. We find that the marginalized 1-$\sigma$ uncertainties in redshift space are $\Delta f_{\rm NL}^{\rm loc} \sim 16$ and $\Delta f_{\rm NL}^{\rm equi} \sim 41 $ on a survey volume of $1$ $($Gpc$/h)^3$. These constraints are weakly affected by redshift errors. We close by speculating as to how this approach can be made robust against small-scale uncertainties by exploiting (non)locality.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
When minor issues matter: symmetries, pluralism, and polarization in similarity-based opinion dynamics
Even an arbitrarily small-weight issue can destabilize stable opinion states and massively slow convergence; concentrating importance on few issues raises polarization, while spreading it promotes pluralism.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.