Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

An Empirical Study on Snapshot DAOs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.15993 v3 pith:YGKZK3WA submitted 2022-11-29 cs.CR

An Empirical Study on Snapshot DAOs

classification cs.CR
keywords datasnapshotdaosempiricalorganizationadoptableanalysisautomatically
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) is an organization constructed by automatically executed rules such as via smart contracts, holding features of the permissionless committee, transparent proposals, and fair contribution by stakeholders. As of Nov 2022, DAO has impacted over \$11.2B market caps. However, there are no substantial studies focused on this emerging field. To fill the gap, we start from the ground truth by empirically studying the breadth and depth of the DAO markets in mainstream public chain ecosystems in this paper. We dive into the most widely adoptable DAO launchpad, \textit{Snapshot}, which covers 95\% in the wild DAO projects for data collection and analysis. By integrating extensive enrolled DAOs and corresponding data measurements, we explore statistical data from Snapshot and try to demystify its undiscovered truths by delivering a series of summarised insights. We also present DAO status, patterns, distribution, and trends. To our knowledge, this is the first empirical study putting concentration on DAO spaces.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Voting Biases in Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) Governance

    cs.CY 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Author-selected Snapshot choices show a 58.8 pp higher voting-power share than non-author choices, exceeding approval (27.1 pp) and first-list (7.7 pp) associations.