Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

MAUD: An Expert-Annotated Legal NLP Dataset for Merger Agreement Understanding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.00876 v3 pith:Q5RUHLOH submitted 2023-01-02 cs.CL

MAUD: An Expert-Annotated Legal NLP Dataset for Merger Agreement Understanding

Steven H. Wang , Antoine Scardigli , Leonard Tang , Wei Chen , Dimitry Levkin , Anya Chen , Spencer Ball , Thomas Woodside
show 2 more authors
Oliver Zhang Dan Hendrycks
This is my paper
classification cs.CL
keywords datasetexpert-annotatedlegalagreementmaudmergercomprehensionquestions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reading comprehension of legal text can be a particularly challenging task due to the length and complexity of legal clauses and a shortage of expert-annotated datasets. To address this challenge, we introduce the Merger Agreement Understanding Dataset (MAUD), an expert-annotated reading comprehension dataset based on the American Bar Association's 2021 Public Target Deal Points Study, with over 39,000 examples and over 47,000 total annotations. Our fine-tuned Transformer baselines show promising results, with models performing well above random on most questions. However, on a large subset of questions, there is still room for significant improvement. As the only expert-annotated merger agreement dataset, MAUD is valuable as a benchmark for both the legal profession and the NLP community.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Capital Markets LLM Reliability Score (CM-LRS): From Plausible to Bankable

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    CM-LRS is a workflow-output-layer reliability score for capital-markets LLM outputs; on five public-document workflows, frontier closed-source models score 4.09–4.31 and Llama 3.3 70B scores 3.15 under four LLM judges.

  2. Non-vacuous Generalization Bounds for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards

    cs.LG 2026-07 reject novelty 6.0

    Non-vacuous PAC-Bayes generalization bounds for billion-parameter RLVR models, obtained by a Gumbel-max reparameterization and aggressive TinyLoRA distillation/quantization, are claimed for four tasks.