Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Test-time Detection and Repair of Adversarial Samples via Masked Autoencoder

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.12848 v3 pith:ZPUOFM6S submitted 2023-03-22 cs.CV cs.LG

Test-time Detection and Repair of Adversarial Samples via Masked Autoencoder

classification cs.CV cs.LG
keywords adversarialattacksrepairsamplestest-timedefensesdetectdetection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Training-time defenses, known as adversarial training, incur high training costs and do not generalize to unseen attacks. Test-time defenses solve these issues but most existing test-time defenses require adapting the model weights, therefore they do not work on frozen models and complicate model memory management. The only test-time defense that does not adapt model weights aims to adapt the input with self-supervision tasks. However, we empirically found these self-supervision tasks are not sensitive enough to detect adversarial attacks accurately. In this paper, we propose DRAM, a novel defense method to detect and repair adversarial samples at test time via Masked autoencoder (MAE). We demonstrate how to use MAE losses to build a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to detect adversarial samples. Moreover, we use the MAE losses to calculate input reversal vectors that repair adversarial samples resulting from previously unseen attacks. Results on large-scale ImageNet dataset show that, compared to all detection baselines evaluated, DRAM achieves the best detection rate (82% on average) on all eight adversarial attacks evaluated. For attack repair, DRAM improves the robust accuracy by 6% ~ 41% for standard ResNet50 and 3% ~ 8% for robust ResNet50 compared with the baselines that use contrastive learning and rotation prediction.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MedFedPure: A Medical Federated Framework with MAE-based Detection and Diffusion Purification for Inference-Time Attacks

    cs.LG 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0

    A client-side test-time defense combining MAE detection with diffusion purification raises federated MRI tumor-classifier adversarial accuracy from 49.5% to 87.3% under bounded PGD attacks.