REVIEW 3 cited by
Economics-Inspired Neural Networks with Stabilizing Homotopies
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Economics-Inspired Neural Networks with Stabilizing Homotopies
read the original abstract
Contemporary deep learning based solution methods used to compute approximate equilibria of high-dimensional dynamic stochastic economic models are often faced with two pain points. The first problem is that the loss function typically encodes a diverse set of equilibrium conditions, such as market clearing and households' or firms' optimality conditions. Hence the training algorithm trades off errors between those -- potentially very different -- equilibrium conditions. This renders the interpretation of the remaining errors challenging. The second problem is that portfolio choice in models with multiple assets is only pinned down for low errors in the corresponding equilibrium conditions. In the beginning of training, this can lead to fluctuating policies for different assets, which hampers the training process. To alleviate these issues, we propose two complementary innovations. First, we introduce Market Clearing Layers, a neural network architecture that automatically enforces all the market clearing conditions and borrowing constraints in the economy. Encoding economic constraints into the neural network architecture reduces the number of terms in the loss function and enhances the interpretability of the remaining equilibrium errors. Furthermore, we present a homotopy algorithm for solving portfolio choice problems with multiple assets, which ameliorates numerical instabilities arising in the context of deep learning. To illustrate our method we solve an overlapping generations model with two permanent risk aversion types, three distinct assets, and aggregate shocks.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Deep Learning for Dynamic Programming with Recursive Utility
CEL jointly learns value, policy, and certainty-equivalent networks for recursive-utility dynamic programming and reports out-of-sample Bellman/Euler residuals of about 1e-4–1e-3 on closed-form, VFI, DSGE, and portfol...
-
DSGE as a Structured World Model:Benchmarking Counterfactual Generalization in Economic Worlds
DSGE models act as structured world models whose generated coverage of rare and counterfactual states roughly halves tail error and cuts regime error 10–280× for the same learned architectures.
-
Deep Learning for Dynamic Programming with Recursive Utility Using First-order Conditions
CEFOL solves recursive-utility dynamic programs by learning a state-control certainty equivalent and minimizing Bellman plus first-order/KKT residuals with neural networks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.