Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

NL2TL: Transforming Natural Languages to Temporal Logics using Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.07766 v2 pith:GDJ2ZGJU submitted 2023-05-12 cs.CL

NL2TL: Transforming Natural Languages to Temporal Logics using Large Language Models

classification cs.CL
keywords datasetmodelmodelsnl-tldomainslanguageliftedllms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Temporal Logic (TL) can be used to rigorously specify complex high-level specification for systems in many engineering applications. The translation between natural language (NL) and TL has been under-explored due to the lack of dataset and generalizable model across different application domains. In this paper, we propose an accurate and generalizable transformation framework of English instructions from NL to TL, exploring the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) at multiple stages. Our contributions are twofold. First, we develop a framework to create a dataset of NL-TL pairs combining LLMs and human annotation. We publish a dataset with 28K NL-TL pairs. Then, we finetune T5 models on the lifted versions (i.e., the specific Atomic Propositions (AP) are hidden) of the NL and TL. The enhanced generalizability originates from two aspects: 1) Usage of lifted NL-TL characterizes common logical structures, without constraints of specific domains. 2) Application of LLMs in dataset creation largely enhances corpus richness. We test the generalization of trained models on five varied domains. To achieve full NL-TL transformation, we either combine the lifted model with AP recognition task or do the further finetuning on each specific domain. During the further finetuning, our model achieves higher accuracy (>95%) using only <10% training data, compared with the baseline sequence to sequence (Seq2Seq) model.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Runtime Monitoring of Perception-Based Autonomous Systems via Embedding Temporal Logic

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Embedding Temporal Logic enables runtime monitoring of temporally extended perceptual behaviors by defining predicates via distances between observed and reference embeddings in learned spaces, with conformal calibrat...

  2. Runtime Monitoring of Perception-Based Autonomous Systems via Embedding Temporal Logic

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Embedding Temporal Logic (ETL) performs runtime monitoring directly in learned embedding spaces using distance-based predicates composed with temporal operators, supported by conformal calibration for reliable predica...

  3. Weights or Skills? A Survey of Robot-Learning Techniques: from Action-Predicting Weights to Robots that Write their Own Skills

    cs.RO 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0

    A taxonomy of robot learning on a weights-versus-skills axis, with a five-rung self-improvement ladder whose top cell (feedback plus memory plus search) holds only a few recent systems.

  4. NeuroNL2LTL: A Neurosymbolic Framework for Natural Language Translation of Linear Temporal Logic

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    NeuroNL2LTL presents a neurosymbolic system with verifier-in-the-loop RL training for NL-to-LTL translation, reporting 28% semantic equivalence and 86% satisfiability on 200k+ requirements across domains.