Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 cited by

Worldline effective field theory of inspiralling black hole binaries in presence of dark photon and axionic dark matter

T0 review · 1 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-05-24 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Binary black hole conservative dynamics receive corrections from dark photon kinetic mixing at 1PN order and from axion-photon coupling at 2.5PN order in a dark matter background.

desk verdict The paper assigns concrete PN orders to dark-matter couplings in worldline EFT for binaries and notes a planar-orbit cancellation in radiation, but the uniform-background assumption needs scrutiny at those orders. read the letter →

arxiv 2305.15473 v4 submitted 2023-05-24 hep-th gr-qchep-ph

Arpan Bhattacharyya , Saptaswa Ghosh , Sounak Pal This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qchep-ph
keywords worldlineeffectivefieldtheoryblackholebinariesdarkmatteraxionsphotonspost-Newtonianexpansiongravitationalradiation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper applies worldline effective field theory to inspiralling non-spinning black hole binaries in an environment of axion-like particles and dark photons. It derives the leading corrections to the two-body conservative potential from each field and coupling, together with the associated radiated power in gravitational, scalar, and vector channels. The kinetic mixing parameter enters the conservative sector at 1PN while the axion-photon coupling enters at 2.5PN; certain radiation contributions from the axion coupling vanish identically for planar orbits. These results supply explicit post-Newtonian corrections that can be folded into waveform models for binaries evolving inside dark matter halos.

What carries the argument

The worldline effective field theory action that couples the binary worldlines to gravitational, scalar axion, Proca dark-photon, and electromagnetic fields together with their interaction vertices.

What would settle it

An explicit evaluation of the effective two-body action demonstrating that g_aγγ enters the conservative dynamics at an order lower than 2.5PN, or a direct computation of the radiative action showing nonzero g_aγγ contributions for strictly planar orbits.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The conservative dynamics are computed up to 1PN for gravitational, electromagnetic, and Proca fields and up to 2PN for the scalar field. The axion-electromagnetic coupling g_aγγ first appears in the conservative dynamics at 2.5PN order and the kinetic mixing constant γ at 1PN order. Radiation calculations show that g_aγγ contributes to gravitational radiation at N(7)LO and to scalar radiation at N(5)LO; these contributions vanish for any orbit confined to a plane because of a binormal term in the effective radiative action but are nonzero for orbits that extend in three dimensions. The parameter γ contributes to gravitational radiation at N(2)LO and N(4)LO.

Load-bearing premise

The dark matter environment is treated as a uniform background that does not back-react on the binary at the post-Newtonian orders retained.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The kinetic mixing constant γ modifies the conservative dynamics at 1PN order.
  • The axion-photon coupling g_aγγ modifies the conservative dynamics at 2.5PN order.
  • g_aγγ contributes to gravitational radiation at N(7)LO and to scalar radiation at N(5)LO.
  • The radiative corrections from g_aγγ vanish for planar orbits but remain for three-dimensional orbits.
  • γ contributes to gravitational radiation at N(2)LO and N(4)LO.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Waveform templates that include these corrections could be used to search for dark-matter-induced phase shifts in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA events.
  • The vanishing of certain axion contributions for planar orbits implies that orbital inclination or eccentricity may serve as an additional observable for constraining the axion-photon coupling.
  • The same worldline framework can be extended to spinning binaries or to higher post-Newtonian orders to generate further dark-matter signatures.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper applies worldline effective field theory to compute post-Newtonian corrections to the conservative dynamics and gravitational/scalar radiation of non-spinning inspiralling binary black holes embedded in a dark-matter environment consisting of axion-like particles and dark photons. It reports conservative dynamics to 1PN order for gravitational, electromagnetic, and Proca sectors and to 2PN for the scalar sector, with the axion-photon coupling g_aγγ entering conservative dynamics at 2.5PN and the kinetic mixing parameter γ at 1PN. Radiative contributions are also computed, including the claim that g_aγγ-induced corrections to gravitational radiation appear at N^(7)LO and to scalar radiation at N^(5)LO, with vanishing contributions for planar orbits due to a binormal-like term in the effective radiative action, while γ contributes at N^(2)LO and N^(4)LO.

Significance. If the central calculations and power-counting assumptions hold, the work supplies concrete PN-order predictions for how dark-photon and axion couplings modify binary dynamics and radiation, including a geometric mechanism that suppresses certain radiative effects in planar orbits. This could be relevant for interpreting gravitational-wave signals in the presence of ultralight dark matter. The explicit statement of PN orders and the identification of the binormal suppression constitute clear, falsifiable outputs.

major comments (1)
  1. [Setup and power counting (likely §2–3)] The treatment of the dark-matter fields as a fixed uniform background whose back-reaction on the binary can be neglected at the claimed orders is load-bearing for all reported corrections. The worldline EFT power counting does not automatically guarantee that binary-sourced perturbations to the scalar or Proca fields remain higher-order; the leading induced density or field fluctuations can enter the effective potential at the same 1–2PN level as the reported dark-matter corrections. An explicit power-counting argument or explicit computation of the back-reaction terms is required to justify the truncation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting this important point on power counting. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Setup and power counting (likely §2–3)] The treatment of the dark-matter fields as a fixed uniform background whose back-reaction on the binary can be neglected at the claimed orders is load-bearing for all reported corrections. The worldline EFT power counting does not automatically guarantee that binary-sourced perturbations to the scalar or Proca fields remain higher-order; the leading induced density or field fluctuations can enter the effective potential at the same 1–2PN level as the reported dark-matter corrections. An explicit power-counting argument or explicit computation of the back-reaction terms is required to justify the truncation.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit justification is required. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph (or short subsection) in §2 that supplies the missing power-counting argument. The argument will show that binary-induced fluctuations of the scalar and Proca fields are suppressed by the small DM density parameter ρ_DM / ρ_binary together with the weak couplings g_aγγ and γ; these factors push the back-reaction contributions to at least 3PN (scalar) and 2.5PN (Proca), safely above the orders we report. We will also clarify why the worldline EFT treats the DM background as external at the orders of interest. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Direct perturbative EFT calculation with no self-referential reductions

full rationale

The paper performs a standard post-Newtonian expansion using worldline effective field theory for the conservative dynamics and radiation in the presence of dark matter fields. The computations are direct perturbative calculations up to specified PN orders, with new couplings entering at specific orders as stated. No equations reduce the results to fitted parameters or self-citations that bear the load of the central claims. Self-citations to prior EFT works are standard and do not create circularity here. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks of EFT power counting.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on the standard worldline EFT axioms for point-particle sources coupled to gravity plus additional fields, plus the post-Newtonian velocity expansion. No new free parameters are introduced beyond the model couplings g_aγγ and γ, which are treated as external constants. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • g_aγγ
    Axion-photon coupling strength; treated as an external parameter whose effects are computed order by order.
  • γ
    Kinetic mixing parameter between dark and ordinary photons; enters at 1PN.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Worldline effective field theory is applicable to non-spinning black holes coupled to gravitational, electromagnetic, Proca, and scalar fields at the stated PN orders.
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the computational framework.
  • domain assumption Dark-matter background is uniform and does not back-react on the binary at the orders considered.
    Implicit in the setup of inspiralling binaries in a dark-matter environment.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Worldline effective field theory of inspiralling black hole binaries in presence of dark photon and axionic dark matter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2305.15473

@misc{pith2026230515473,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Worldline effective field theory of inspiralling black hole binaries in presence of dark photon and axionic dark matter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2305.15473}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2305.15473}
}
abstract

We investigate the correction to the potential that gives rise to the bound orbits and radiation from non-spinning inspiralling binary black holes in a dark matter environment consisting of axion-like particles and dark photons using the techniques of Worldline Effective Field Theory. We compute the conservative dynamics up to $1$PN order for gravitational, electromagnetic, and Proca fields and up to $2$PN order for the scalar field. The effect of axion-electromagnetic coupling ($g_{a\gamma\gamma}$) arises to the conservative dynamics at $2.5$PN order and the kinetic mixing constant ($\gamma$) at $1$PN order. Furthermore, we calculate the radiation due to the various fields present in our theory. We find that the contribution of $g_{a\gamma\gamma}$ to the gravitational radiation appears at $N^{(7)}LO$ and to the scalar radiation appears at $N^{(5)}LO$. We also find that these radiative corrections due to the coupling $g_{a\gamma\gamma}$ vanishes for any orbit confined to a plane because of the existence of a binormal like term in effective radiative action but give rise to non-zero contributions for any orbit that lies in three dimensions. Last but not the least, $\gamma$ contributes to the gravitational radiation at $N^{(2)}LO$ and $N^{(4)}LO$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in Black-Hole Scattering at $\mathcal{O}(G^3)$: Quadratic-in-Spin Effects

    hep-th 2025-05 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    First computation of the O(G^3 S^2) momentum-space gravitational waveform for two scattering spinning black holes, plus the leading three-body spinning waveform.

  2. Angular momentum flux through post-Newtonian order for noncircular nonspinning black-hole binaries in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton theory

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The scalar, electromagnetic, and tensor contributions to the angular momentum flux from noncircular EMd binaries are derived through 1PN order.

  3. Heterotic Footprints in Classical Gravity: PM dynamics from On-Shell soft amplitudes at one loop

    hep-th 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Derives conservative potential and scattering angle for charged black holes in EMD theory via one-loop soft amplitudes, showing IR finiteness after Lippmann-Schwinger treatment and smooth reduction to GR.

  4. Dynamical Tidal Response of Non-rotating Black Holes: Connecting the MST Formalism and Worldline EFT

    gr-qc 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Renormalized dynamical tidal response functions for non-rotating black holes in GR carry inevitable ambiguities from renormalization scheme and flow initial condition, yielding scheme-dependent dynamical tidal Love nu...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

165 extracted references · 165 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    LIGO Scientific, VirgoCollaboration, B. P. Abbottet al., Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116 (2016), no. 6, 061102 [1602.03837]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    LIGO Scientific, VirgoCollaboration, B. P. Abbottet al., GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016), no. 24, 241103 [1606.04855]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    LIGO Scientific, VirgoCollaboration, B. P. Abbottet al., Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett.116 (2016), no. 24, 241102 [1602.03840]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    LIGO Scientific, VIRGOCollaboration, B. P. Abbottet al., GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2, Phys. Rev. Lett.118 (2017), no. 22, 221101 [1706.01812], [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129901 (2018)]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Kokeyama,Observing the Universe from Underground Gravitational Wave Telescope KAGRA, in3rd World Summit on Exploring the Dark Side of the Universe, pp

    KAGRA Collaboration, K. Kokeyama,Observing the Universe from Underground Gravitational Wave Telescope KAGRA, in3rd World Summit on Exploring the Dark Side of the Universe, pp. 41–48. 2020

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    LIGO Scientific, VirgoCollaboration, B. P. Abbottet al., A guide to LIGO–Virgo detector noise and extraction of transient gravitational-wave signals, Class. Quant. Grav.37 (2020), no. 5, 055002 [1908.11170]

    work page arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Numerical Relativity and Astrophysics

    L. Lehner and F. Pretorius,Numerical Relativity and Astrophysics, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 52 (2014) 661–694 [1405.4840]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  8. [8]

    The NINJA-2 project: Detecting and characterizing gravitational waveforms modelled using numerical binary black hole simulations

    LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, NINJA-2Collaboration, J. Aasiet al., The NINJA-2 project: Detecting and characterizing gravitational waveforms modelled using numerical binary black hole simulations, Class. Quant. Grav.31 (2014) 115004 [1401.0939]. – 70 –

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

Show all 165 references
  1. [9]

    Blanchet,Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries, Living Rev

    L. Blanchet,Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries, Living Rev. Rel.17 (2014) 2 [1310.1528]

    2014 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Tagoshi, A

    H. Tagoshi, A. Ohashi and B. J. Owen,Gravitational field and equations of motion of spinning compact binaries to 2.5 postNewtonian order, Phys. Rev. D63 (2001) 044006 [gr-qc/0010014]

    2001 arXiv

  3. [11]

    G. Faye, L. Blanchet and A. Buonanno,Higher-order spin effects in the dynamics of compact binaries. I. Equations of motion, Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 104033 [gr-qc/0605139]

    2006 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Blanchet, A

    L. Blanchet, A. Buonanno and G. Faye,Higher-order spin effects in the dynamics of compact binaries. II. Radiation field, Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 104034 [gr-qc/0605140], [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 75, 049903 (2007), Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 81, 089901 (2010)]

    2006 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Blanchet, T

    L. Blanchet, T. Damour, G. Esposito-Farese and B. R. Iyer,Gravitational radiation from inspiralling compact binaries completed at the third post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. Lett.93 (2004) 091101 [gr-qc/0406012]

    2004 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Damour, P

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski and G. Schaefer,Equivalence between the ADM-Hamiltonian and the harmonic coordinates approaches to the third postNewtonian dynamics of compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D63 (2001) 044021 [gr-qc/0010040], [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 66, 029901 (2002)]

    2001 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Itoh and T

    Y. Itoh and T. Futamase,New derivation of a third postNewtonian equation of motion for relativistic compact binaries without ambiguity, Phys. Rev. D68 (2003) 121501 [gr-qc/0310028]

    2003 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Boetzel, C

    Y. Boetzel, C. K. Mishra, G. Faye, A. Gopakumar and B. R. Iyer,Gravitational-wave amplitudes for compact binaries in eccentric orbits at the third post-Newtonian order: Tail contributions and postadiabatic corrections, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019), no. 4, 044018 [1904.11814]

    2019

  9. [17]

    G. Faye, S. Marsat, L. Blanchet and B. R. Iyer,The third and a half post-Newtonian gravitational wave quadrupole mode for quasi-circular inspiralling compact binaries, Class. Quant. Grav.29 (2012) 175004 [1204.1043]

    2012 arXiv

  10. [18]

    C. K. Mishra, K. G. Arun and B. R. Iyer,2.5PN kick from black-hole binaries in circular orbit: Nonspinning case, Springer Proc. Phys.157 (2014) 169–175 [1304.5915]

    2014 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Fujita and B

    R. Fujita and B. R. Iyer,Spherical harmonic modes of 5.5 post-Newtonian gravitational wave polarisations and associated factorised resummed waveforms for a particle in circular orbit around a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 044051 [1005.2266]

    2010 arXiv

  12. [20]

    G. Faye, L. Blanchet and B. R. Iyer,Non-linear multipole interactions and gravitational-wave octupole modes for inspiralling compact binaries to third-and-a-half post-Newtonian order, Class. Quant. Grav.32 (2015), no. 4, 045016 [1409.3546]

    2015 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Blanchet, G

    L. Blanchet, G. Faye, Q. Henry, F. Larrouturou and D. Trestini,Gravitational Wave Flux and Quadrupole Modes from Quasi-Circular Non-Spinning Compact Binaries to the Fourth Post-Newtonian Order, 2304.11186

  14. [22]

    Blanchet, G

    L. Blanchet, G. Faye, Q. Henry, F. Larrouturou and D. Trestini,Gravitational-Wave Phasing of Compact Binary Systems to the Fourth-and-a-Half post-Newtonian Order, 2304.11185

  15. [23]

    Larrouturou, L

    F. Larrouturou, L. Blanchet, Q. Henry and G. Faye,The quadrupole moment of compact binaries to the fourth post-Newtonian order: II. Dimensional regularization and renormalization, Class. Quant. Grav.39 (2022), no. 11, 115008 [2110.02243]. – 71 –

    2022

  16. [24]

    Blanchet and B

    L. Blanchet and B. R. Iyer,Hadamard regularization of the third post-Newtonian gravitational wave generation of two point masses, Phys. Rev. D71 (2005) 024004 [gr-qc/0409094]

    2005 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Blanchet, G

    L. Blanchet, G. Faye, Q. Henry, F. Larrouturou and D. Trestini,Gravitational waves from compact binaries to the fourth post-Newtonian order, in57th Rencontres de Moriond on Gravitation. 4, 2023. 2304.13647

    2023

  18. [26]

    K. G. Arun, B. R. Iyer, B. S. Sathyaprakash and P. A. Sundararajan,Parameter estimation of inspiralling compact binaries using 3.5 post-Newtonian gravitational wave phasing: The Non-spinning case, Phys. Rev. D71 (2005) 084008 [gr-qc/0411146], [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 72, 069903 (2005)]

    2005 arXiv

  19. [27]

    B. M. Barker and R. F. O’Connell,Gravitational two-body problem with arbitrary masses, spins, and quadrupole moments, Phys. Rev. D12 (Jul, 1975) 329–335

    1975

  20. [28]

    B. M. Barker and R. F. O’Connell,Derivation of the Equations of Motion of a Gyroscope from the Quantum Theory of Gravitation, Phys. Rev. D2 (Oct, 1970) 1428–1435

    1970

  21. [29]

    L. E. Kidder, C. M. Will and A. G. Wiseman,Spin effects in the inspiral of coalescing compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D47 (1993), no. 10, R4183–R4187 [gr-qc/9211025]

    1993 arXiv

  22. [30]

    G. Cho, R. A. Porto and Z. Yang,Gravitational radiation from inspiralling compact objects: Spin effects to the fourth post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022), no. 10, L101501 [2201.05138]

    2022

  23. [31]

    Steinhoff, S

    J. Steinhoff, S. Hergt and G. Schaefer,On the next-to-leading order gravitational spin(1)-spin(2) dynamics, Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 081501 [0712.1716]

    2008 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Steinhoff, S

    J. Steinhoff, S. Hergt and G. Schaefer,Spin-squared Hamiltonian of next-to-leading order gravitational interaction, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 101503 [0809.2200]

    2008 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Hergt and G

    S. Hergt and G. Schaefer,Higher-order-in-spin interaction Hamiltonians for binary black holes from Poincare invariance, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 124004 [0809.2208]

    2008 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Hergt, J

    S. Hergt, J. Steinhoff and G. Schaefer,Reduced Hamiltonian for next-to-leading order Spin-Squared Dynamics of General Compact Binaries, Class. Quant. Grav.27 (2010) 135007 [1002.2093]

    2010 arXiv

  27. [35]

    R. A. Porto, A. Ross and I. Z. Rothstein,Spin induced multipole moments for the gravitational wave amplitude from binary inspirals to 2.5 Post-Newtonian order, JCAP09 (2012) 028 [1203.2962]

    2012 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Enoki and M

    M. Enoki and M. Nagashima,The Effect of Orbital Eccentricity on Gravitational Wave Background Radiation from Cosmological Binaries, Prog. Theor. Phys.117 (2007) 241 [astro-ph/0609377]

    2007 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Favata,The Gravitational-wave memory from eccentric binaries, Phys

    M. Favata,The Gravitational-wave memory from eccentric binaries, Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 124013 [1108.3121]

    2011 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Munna and C

    C. Munna and C. R. Evans,Eccentric-orbit extreme-mass-ratio-inspiral radiation: Analytic forms of leading-logarithm and subleading-logarithm flux terms at high PN orders, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019), no. 10, 104060 [1909.05877]

    2019

  31. [39]

    Zhang, T

    X. Zhang, T. Liu and W. Zhao,Gravitational radiation from compact binary systems in screened modified gravity, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017), no. 10, 104027 [1702.08752]. – 72 –

    2017 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Chowdhuri and A

    A. Chowdhuri and A. Bhattacharyya,Study of eccentric binaries in Horndeski gravity, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022), no. 6, 064046 [2203.09917]

    2022

  33. [41]

    Zhang, W

    X. Zhang, W. Zhao, T. Liu, K. Lin, C. Zhang, X. Zhao, S. Zhang, T. Zhu and A. Wang, Angular momentum loss for eccentric compact binary in screened modified gravity, JCAP01 (2019) 019 [1811.00339]

    2019 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Saffer and N

    A. Saffer and N. Yunes,Angular momentum loss for a binary system in Einstein-Æther theory, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018), no. 12, 124015 [1807.08049]

    2018 arXiv

  35. [43]

    K. Lin, X. Zhao, C. Zhang, T. Liu, B. Wang, S. Zhang, X. Zhang, W. Zhao, T. Zhu and A. Wang,Gravitational waveforms, polarizations, response functions, and energy losses of triple systems in Einstein-aether theory, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019), no. 2, 023010 [1810.07707]

    2019 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Z. Li, J. Qiao, T. Liu, T. Zhu and W. Zhao,Gravitational waveform and polarization from binary black hole inspiral in dynamical Chern-Simons gravity: from generation to propagation, JCAP 04 (2023) 006 [2211.12188]

    2023

  37. [45]

    Shiralilou, T

    B. Shiralilou, T. Hinderer, S. M. Nissanke, N. Ortiz and H. Witek,Post-Newtonian gravitational and scalar waves in scalar-Gauss–Bonnet gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.39 (2022), no. 3, 035002 [2105.13972]

    2022

  38. [46]

    Julié and E

    F.-L. Julié and E. Berti,Post-Newtonian dynamics and black hole thermodynamics in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019), no. 10, 104061 [1909.05258]

    2019

  39. [47]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein,An Effective field theory of gravity for extended objects, Phys. Rev. D73 (2006) 104029 [hep-th/0409156]

    2006 arXiv

  40. [48]

    R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein,Apparent ambiguities in the post-Newtonian expansion for binary systems, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017), no. 2, 024062 [1703.06433]

    2017 arXiv

  41. [49]

    R. A. Porto and R. Sturani,Scalar gravity: Post-Newtonian corrections via an effective field theory approach, inLes Houches Summer School - Session 86: Particle Physics and Cosmology: The Fabric of Spacetime. 1, 2007. gr-qc/0701105

    2007 arXiv

  42. [50]

    W. D. Goldberger, A. Ross and I. Z. Rothstein,Black hole mass dynamics and renormalization group evolution, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014), no. 12, 124033 [1211.6095]

    2014 arXiv

  43. [51]

    C. R. Galley, A. K. Leibovich, R. A. Porto and A. Ross,Tail effect in gravitational radiation reaction: Time nonlocality and renormalization group evolution, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 124010 [1511.07379]

    2016 arXiv

  44. [52]

    R. A. Porto, A. Ross and I. Z. Rothstein,Spin induced multipole moments for the gravitational wave flux from binary inspirals to third Post-Newtonian order, JCAP03 (2011) 009 [1007.1312]

    2011 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Levi,Binary dynamics from spin1-spin2 coupling at fourth post-Newtonian order, Phys

    M. Levi,Binary dynamics from spin1-spin2 coupling at fourth post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 064043 [1107.4322]

    2012 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Levi and J

    M. Levi and J. Steinhoff,Next-to-next-to-leading order gravitational spin-orbit coupling via the effective field theory for spinning objects in the post-Newtonian scheme, JCAP01 (2016) 011 [1506.05056]

    2016

  47. [55]

    Levi and J

    M. Levi and J. Steinhoff,Next-to-next-to-leading order gravitational spin-squared potential via – 73 – the effective field theory for spinning objects in the post-Newtonian scheme, JCAP01 (2016) 008 [1506.05794]

    2016

  48. [56]

    Levi and J

    M. Levi and J. Steinhoff,Equivalence of ADM Hamiltonian and Effective Field Theory approaches at next-to-next-to-leading order spin1-spin2 coupling of binary inspirals, JCAP12 (2014) 003 [1408.5762]

    2014 arXiv

  49. [57]

    N. T. Maia, C. R. Galley, A. K. Leibovich and R. A. Porto,Radiation reaction for spinning bodies in effective field theory I: Spin-orbit effects, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017), no. 8, 084064 [1705.07934]

    2017 arXiv

  50. [58]

    N. T. Maia, C. R. Galley, A. K. Leibovich and R. A. Porto,Radiation reaction for spinning bodies in effective field theory II: Spin-spin effects, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017), no. 8, 084065 [1705.07938]

    2017 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Foffa, R

    S. Foffa, R. A. Porto, I. Rothstein and R. Sturani,Conservative dynamics of binary systems to fourth Post-Newtonian order in the EFT approach II: Renormalized Lagrangian, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019), no. 2, 024048 [1903.05118]

    2019

  52. [60]

    Kälin, J

    G. Kälin, J. Neef and R. A. Porto,Radiation-reaction in the Effective Field Theory approach to Post-Minkowskian dynamics, JHEP01 (2023) 140 [2207.00580]

    2023

  53. [61]

    R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein,Next to Leading Order Spin(1)Spin(1) Effects in the Motion of Inspiralling Compact Binaries, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 044013 [0804.0260], [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 81, 029905 (2010)]

    2008 arXiv

  54. [62]

    R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein,Spin(1)Spin(2) Effects in the Motion of Inspiralling Compact Binaries at Third Order in the Post-Newtonian Expansion, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 044012 [0802.0720], [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 81, 029904 (2010)]

    2008 arXiv

  55. [63]

    R. A. Porto,New results at 3PN via an effective field theory of gravity, in11th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, pp. 2493–2496. 1, 2007.gr-qc/0701106

    2007 arXiv

  56. [64]

    M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, R. Patil and J. Steinhoff,Gravitational spin-orbit Hamiltonian at NNNLO in the post-Newtonian framework, JHEP03 (2023) 130 [2209.00611]

    2023

  57. [65]

    M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, R. Patil and J. Steinhoff,Gravitational Quadratic-in-Spin Hamiltonian at NNNLO in the post-Newtonian framework, 2210.09176

  58. [66]

    W. D. Goldberger and A. Ross,Gravitational radiative corrections from effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 124015 [0912.4254]

    2010 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Ross,Multipole expansion at the level of the action, Phys

    A. Ross,Multipole expansion at the level of the action, Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 125033 [1202.4750]

    2012 arXiv

  60. [68]

    W. D. Goldberger, J. Li and I. Z. Rothstein,Non-conservative effects on spinning black holes from world-line effective field theory, JHEP06 (2021) 053 [2012.14869]

    2021

  61. [69]

    W. D. Goldberger, J. Li and S. G. Prabhu,Spinning particles, axion radiation, and the classical double copy, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018), no. 10, 105018 [1712.09250]

    2018 arXiv

  62. [70]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein,Towers of Gravitational Theories, Gen. Rel. Grav.38 (2006) 1537–1546 [hep-th/0605238]

    2006 arXiv

  63. [71]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein,Dissipative effects in the worldline approach to black hole dynamics, Phys. Rev. D73 (2006) 104030 [hep-th/0511133]. – 74 –

    2006 arXiv

  64. [72]

    W. D. Goldberger,Effective Field Theory for Compact Binary Dynamics, 2212.06677

  65. [73]

    W. D. Goldberger,Effective field theories of gravity and compact binary dynamics: A Snowmass 2021 whitepaper, inSnowmass 2021. 6, 2022. 2206.14249

    2021

  66. [74]

    Kuntz, F

    A. Kuntz, F. Piazza and F. Vernizzi,Effective field theory for gravitational radiation in scalar-tensor gravity, JCAP05 (2019) 052 [1902.04941]

    2019 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Huang, M

    J. Huang, M. C. Johnson, L. Sagunski, M. Sakellariadou and J. Zhang,Prospects for axion searches with Advanced LIGO through binary mergers, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019), no. 6, 063013 [1807.02133]

    2019 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Patil,EFT approach to general relativity: correction to EIH Lagrangian due to electromagnetic charge, Gen

    R. Patil,EFT approach to general relativity: correction to EIH Lagrangian due to electromagnetic charge, Gen. Rel. Grav.52 (2020), no. 9, 95 [2009.11107]

    2020

  69. [77]

    P. K. Gupta,Binary dynamics from Einstein-Maxwell theory at second post-Newtonian order using effective field theory, 2205.11591

  70. [78]

    Grilli di Cortona, E

    G. Grilli di Cortona, E. Hardy, J. Pardo Vega and G. Villadoro,The QCD axion, precisely, JHEP 01 (2016) 034 [1511.02867]

    2016 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Sanchis-Gual and P

    N. Sanchis-Gual and P. Izquierdo,Ultralight bosonic dark matter in white dwarfs and potential observational consequences, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022), no. 8, 084023 [2202.00434]

    2022

  72. [80]

    I. S. Goldstein, S. M. Koushiappas and M. G. Walker,Viability of ultralight bosonic dark matter in dwarf galaxies, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022), no. 6, 063010 [2206.05244]

    2022

  73. [81]

    Schutz,Subhalo mass function and ultralight bosonic dark matter, Phys

    K. Schutz,Subhalo mass function and ultralight bosonic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D101 (2020), no. 12, 123026 [2001.05503]

    2020

  74. [82]

    Kamionkowski, J

    M. Kamionkowski, J. Pradler and D. G. E. Walker,Dark energy from the string axiverse, Phys. Rev. Lett.113 (2014), no. 25, 251302 [1409.0549]

    2014 arXiv

  75. [83]

    C. B. Adamset al., Axion Dark Matter, inSnowmass 2021. 3, 2022. 2203.14923

    2021

  76. [84]

    Fukuda and S

    H. Fukuda and S. Shirai,Detection of QCD axion dark matter by coherent scattering, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022), no. 9, 095030 [2112.13536]

    2022

  77. [85]

    Kwonet al., First Results from an Axion Haloscope at CAPP around 10.7 µeV, Phys

    CAPP Collaboration, O. Kwonet al., First Results from an Axion Haloscope at CAPP around 10.7 µeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021), no. 19, 191802 [2012.10764]

    2021

  78. [86]

    Sakhelashvili,Consistency of the dual formulation of axion solutions to the strong CP problem, Phys

    O. Sakhelashvili,Consistency of the dual formulation of axion solutions to the strong CP problem, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022), no. 8, 085020 [2110.03386]

    2022

  79. [87]

    R. D. Peccei,The Strong CP problem and axions, Lect. Notes Phys.741 (2008) 3–17 [hep-ph/0607268]

    2008 arXiv

  80. [88]

    J. E. Kim and G. Carosi,Axions and the strongCP problem, Rev. Mod. Phys.82 (Mar, 2010) 557–601

    2010

  81. [89]

    Weinberg,A New Light Boson?, Phys

    S. Weinberg,A New Light Boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett.40 (Jan, 1978) 223–226

    1978

  82. [90]

    Wilczek,Problem of StrongP and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys

    F. Wilczek,Problem of StrongP and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (Jan, 1978) 279–282

    1978

  83. [91]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise and F. Wilczek,Cosmology of the Invisible Axion, Phys. Lett. B120 (1983) 127–132. – 75 –

    1983

  84. [92]

    Gorghetto and G

    M. Gorghetto and G. Villadoro,Topological Susceptibility and QCD Axion Mass: QED and NNLO corrections, JHEP03 (2019) 033 [1812.01008]

    2019

  85. [93]

    Di Luzio, B

    L. Di Luzio, B. Gavela, P. Quilez and A. Ringwald,An even lighter QCD axion, JHEP05 (2021) 184 [2102.00012]

    2021

  86. [94]

    Berezhiani, L

    Z. Berezhiani, L. Gianfagna and M. Giannotti,Strong CP problem and mirror world: The Weinberg-Wilczek axion revisited, Phys. Lett. B500 (2001) 286–296 [hep-ph/0009290]

    2001 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Fukuda, K

    H. Fukuda, K. Harigaya, M. Ibe and T. T. Yanagida,Model of visible QCD axion, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015), no. 1, 015021 [1504.06084]

    2015 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Dimopoulos, A

    S. Dimopoulos, A. Hook, J. Huang and G. Marques-Tavares,A collider observable QCD axion, JHEP 11 (2016) 052 [1606.03097]

    2016 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Gherghetta, N

    T. Gherghetta, N. Nagata and M. Shifman,A Visible QCD Axion from an Enlarged Color Group, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016), no. 11, 115010 [1604.01127]

    2016 arXiv

  90. [98]

    J. E. Kim,Constraints on very light axions from cavity experiments, Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 055006 [hep-ph/9802220]

    1998 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Di Luzio, M

    L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi and L. Visinelli,The landscape of QCD axion models, Phys. Rept.870 (2020) 1–117 [2003.01100]

    2020 arXiv

  92. [100]

    J. P. Conlon,The QCD axion and moduli stabilisation, JHEP05 (2006) 078 [hep-th/0602233]

    2006 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Chakraborty, T

    S. Chakraborty, T. H. Jung and T. Okui,Composite neutrinos and the QCD axion: Baryogenesis, dark matter, small Dirac neutrino masses, and vanishing neutron electric dipole moment, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022), no. 1, 015024 [2108.04293]

    2022

  94. [102]

    Harigaya and J

    K. Harigaya and J. M. Leedom,QCD Axion Dark Matter from a Late Time Phase Transition, JHEP 06 (2020) 034 [1910.04163]

    2020

  95. [103]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,CP Conservation in the Presence of Pseudoparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett.38 (Jun, 1977) 1440–1443

    1977

  96. [104]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,Constraints imposed byCP conservation in the presence of pseudoparticles, Phys. Rev. D16 (Sep, 1977) 1791–1797

    1977

  97. [105]

    Clowe, M

    D. Clowe, M. Bradac, A. H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S. W. Randall, C. Jones and D. Zaritsky,A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter, Astrophys. J. Lett.648 (2006) L109–L113 [astro-ph/0608407]

    2006 arXiv

  98. [106]

    S. D. H. Hsu and F. Sannino,New solutions to the strong CP problem, Phys. Lett. B605 (2005) 369–375 [hep-ph/0408319]

    2005 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Agrawal and K

    P. Agrawal and K. Howe,Factoring the Strong CP Problem, JHEP12 (2018) 029 [1710.04213]

    2018 arXiv

  100. [108]

    R. S. Gupta, V. V. Khoze and M. Spannowsky,Small instantons and the strong CP problem in composite Higgs models, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021), no. 7, 075011 [2012.00017]

    2021

  101. [109]

    J. E. Kim,Weak-Interaction Singlet and StrongCP Invariance, Phys. Rev. Lett.43 (Jul,

  102. [110]

    C. A. Bakeret al., An Improved experimental limit on the electric dipole moment of the neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett.97 (2006) 131801 [hep-ex/0602020]

    2006 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Zhang, Z

    J. Zhang, Z. Lyu, J. Huang, M. C. Johnson, L. Sagunski, M. Sakellariadou and H. Yang,First Constraints on Nuclear Coupling of Axionlike Particles from the Binary Neutron Star Gravitational Wave Event GW170817, Phys. Rev. Lett.127 (2021), no. 16, 161101 [2105.13963]

    2021

  104. [112]

    ADMX CollaborationCollaboration, N. Du, N. Force, R. Khatiwada, E. Lentz, R. Ottens, L. J. Rosenberg, G. Rybka, G. Carosi, N. Woollett, D. Bowring, A. S. Chou, A. Sonnenschein, W. Wester, C. Boutan, N. S. Oblath, R. Bradley, E. J. Daw, A. V. Dixit, J. Clarke, S. R. O’Kelley, N...

    2018

  105. [113]

    Balkin, J

    R. Balkin, J. Serra, K. Springmann, S. Stelzl and A. Weiler,White dwarfs as a probe of light QCD axions, 2211.02661

  106. [114]

    Cicoli,Axion-like Particles from String Compactifications, in9th Patras Workshop on Axions, WIMPs and WISPs, pp

    M. Cicoli,Axion-like Particles from String Compactifications, in9th Patras Workshop on Axions, WIMPs and WISPs, pp. 235–242. 2013.1309.6988

    2013

  107. [115]

    Svrcek,Cosmological Constant and Axions in String Theory, hep-th/0607086

    P. Svrcek,Cosmological Constant and Axions in String Theory, hep-th/0607086

    arXiv

  108. [116]

    Hiramatsu, M

    T. Hiramatsu, M. Kawasaki, T. Sekiguchi, M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama,Improved estimation of radiated axions from cosmological axionic strings, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 123531 [1012.5502]

    2011 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Arias, D

    P. Arias, D. Cadamuro, M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, J. Redondo and A. Ringwald,WISPy Cold Dark Matter, JCAP06 (2012) 013 [1201.5902]

    2012 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Quilez Lasanta, L

    P. Quilez Lasanta, L. Di Luzio, B. Gavela and A. Ringwald,An exceptionally light axion: Strong CP and Dark Matter, PoSEPS-HEP2021 (2022) 177 [2111.03149]

    2022

  111. [119]

    Ishii, Y

    T. Ishii, Y. Kaku and K. Murata,Energy extraction from AdS black holes via superradiance, JHEP 10 (2022) 024 [2207.03123]

    2022

  112. [120]

    Cardoso, O

    V. Cardoso, O. J. C. Dias, G. S. Hartnett, M. Middleton, P. Pani and J. E. Santos, Constraining the mass of dark photons and axion-like particles through black-hole superradiance, JCAP03 (2018) 043 [1801.01420]

    2018 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Brito, V

    R. Brito, V. Cardoso and P. Pani,Superradiance: New Frontiers in Black Hole Physics, Lect. Notes Phys.906 (2015) pp.1–237 [1501.06570]

    2015 arXiv

  114. [122]

    D. K. Ghosh, A. Ghoshal and S. Jeesun,Axion-like particle (ALP) portal freeze-in dark matter confronting ALP search experiments, 2305.09188

  115. [123]

    C. T. Hill,Axion Induced Oscillating Electric Dipole Moment of the Electron, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016), no. 2, 025007 [1508.04083]

    2016 arXiv

  116. [124]

    V. V. Flambaum and I. B. Samsonov,Ultralight dark photon as a model for early universe dark matter, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019), no. 6, 063541 [1908.09432]

    2019

  117. [125]

    Zhang and H

    J. Zhang and H. Yang,Dynamic Signatures of Black Hole Binaries with Superradiant Clouds, Phys. Rev. D101 (2020), no. 4, 043020 [1907.13582]. – 77 –

    2020

  118. [126]

    F. Dar, C. De Rham, J. T. Deskins, J. T. Giblin and A. J. Tolley,Scalar Gravitational Radiation from Binaries: Vainshtein Mechanism in Time-dependent Systems, Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019), no. 2, 025008 [1808.02165]

    2019 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Yoshida and J

    D. Yoshida and J. Soda,Exploring the string axiverse and parity violation in gravity with gravitational waves, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D27 (2018), no. 09, 1850096 [1708.09592]

    2018 arXiv

  120. [128]

    C. S. Machado, W. Ratzinger, P. Schwaller and B. A. Stefanek,Audible Axions, JHEP01 (2019) 053 [1811.01950]

    2019 arXiv

  121. [129]

    C. S. Machado, W. Ratzinger, P. Schwaller and B. A. Stefanek,Gravitational wave probes of axionlike particles, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020), no. 7, 075033 [1912.01007]

    2020

  122. [130]

    Madge, W

    E. Madge, W. Ratzinger, D. Schmitt and P. Schwaller,Audible axions with a booster: Stochastic gravitational waves from rotating ALPs, SciPost Phys.12 (2022) 171

    2022

  123. [131]

    Ejlli, S

    A. Ejlli, S. M. Vermeulen, E. Schwartz, L. Aiello and H. Grote,Probing dark matter with polarimetry techniques, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023), no. 8, 083035 [2211.09922]

    2023

  124. [132]

    Nagano, H

    K. Nagano, H. Nakatsuka, S. Morisaki, T. Fujita, Y. Michimura and I. Obata,Axion dark matter search using arm cavity transmitted beams of gravitational wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 6, 062008 [2106.06800]

    2021

  125. [133]

    C. P. Burgess,Introduction to Effective Field Theory. Cambridge University Press, 12, 2020

    2020

  126. [134]

    R. A. Porto,The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics, Phys. Rept.633 (2016) 1–104 [1601.04914]

    2016 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Kol and M

    B. Kol and M. Smolkin,Non-Relativistic Gravitation: From Newton to Einstein and Back, Class. Quant. Grav.25 (2008) 145011 [0712.4116]

    2008 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Levi,Effective Field Theories of Post-Newtonian Gravity: A comprehensive review, Rept

    M. Levi,Effective Field Theories of Post-Newtonian Gravity: A comprehensive review, Rept. Prog. Phys.83 (2020), no. 7, 075901 [1807.01699]

    2020

  129. [137]

    P. I. Dyadina, N. A. Avdeev and S. O. Alexeyev,Horndeski gravity without screening in binary pulsars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.483 (2019), no. 1, 947–963 [1811.05393]

    2019 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Nastase,The Optical Theorem and the Cutting Rules, p

    H. Nastase,The Optical Theorem and the Cutting Rules, p. 188–196. Cambridge University Press, 2019

    2019

  131. [139]

    C. M. W. Eric Poisson,Gravity: Newtonian, Post-Newtonian, Relativistic. Cambridge University Press, 5, 2014

    2014

  132. [140]

    L. Liu, Ø. Christiansen, W.-H. Ruan, Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai and S. P. Kim,Gravitational and electromagnetic radiation from binary black holes with electric and magnetic charges: elliptical orbits on a cone, European Physical Journal C81 (Nov., 2021) 1048 [2011.13586]

    2021

  133. [141]

    Z.-C. Chen, S. P. Kim and L. Liu,Gravitational and electromagnetic radiation from binary black holes with electric and magnetic charges: Hyperbolic orbits on a cone, 2210.15564

  134. [142]

    L. Liu, O. Christiansen, Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai and S. P. Kim,Gravitational and electromagnetic radiation from binary black holes with electric and magnetic charges: Circular orbits on a cone, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020), no. 10, 103520 [2008.02326]

    2020

  135. [143]

    Cardoso, C

    V. Cardoso, C. F. B. Macedo and R. Vicente,Eccentricity evolution of compact binaries and applications to gravitational-wave physics, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021), no. 2, 023015 [2010.15151]. – 78 –

    2021

  136. [144]

    Husa,Michele Maggiore: Gravitational waves

    S. Husa,Michele Maggiore: Gravitational waves. Volume 1: theory and experiments. Oxford University Press, 2007, 576p., GBP47.00, ISBN13: 978-0-19-857074-5, General Relativity and Gravitation41 (July, 2009) 1667–1669

    2007

  137. [145]

    Anastasiou, E

    C. Anastasiou, E. W. N. Glover and C. Oleari,Scalar one loop integrals using the negative dimension approach, Nucl. Phys. B572 (2000) 307–360 [hep-ph/9907494]

    2000 arXiv

  138. [146]

    Weinzierl,Feynman Integrals, arXiv e-prints (Jan., 2022) arXiv:2201.03593 [2201.03593]

    S. Weinzierl,Feynman Integrals, arXiv e-prints (Jan., 2022) arXiv:2201.03593 [2201.03593]

    2022

  139. [147]

    Coogan, G

    A. Coogan, G. Bertone, D. Gaggero, B. J. Kavanagh and D. A. Nichols,Measuring the dark matter environments of black hole binaries with gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022), no. 4, 043009 [2108.04154]

    2022

  140. [148]

    Singh, A

    D. Singh, A. Gupta, E. Berti, S. Reddy and B. S. Sathyaprakash,Constraining properties of asymmetric dark matter candidates from gravitational-wave observations, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023), no. 8, 083037 [2210.15739]

    2023

  141. [149]

    Becker, L

    N. Becker, L. Sagunski, L. Prinz and S. Rastgoo,Circularization versus eccentrification in intermediate mass ratio inspirals inside dark matter spikes, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022), no. 6, 063029 [2112.09586]

    2022

  142. [150]

    Yue and Z

    X.-J. Yue and Z. Cao,Dark matter minispike: A significant enhancement of eccentricity for intermediate-mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019), no. 4, 043013 [1908.10241]

    2019

  143. [151]

    Bhattacharya, B

    S. Bhattacharya, B. Dasgupta, R. Laha and A. Ray,Can LIGO Detect Asymmetric Dark Matter?, 2302.07898

  144. [152]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. Kälin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto,Dynamics of binary systems to fourth Post-Minkowskian order from the effective field theory approach, Phys. Lett. B831 (2022) 137203 [2106.08276]

    2022

  145. [153]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. Kälin, Z. Liu, J. Neef and R. A. Porto,Radiation Reaction and Gravitational Waves at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order, Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (2023), no. 10, 101401 [2210.05541]

    2023

  146. [154]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. Kälin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto,Conservative Dynamics of Binary Systems at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order in the Large-Eccentricity Expansion, Phys. Rev. Lett.128 (2022), no. 16, 161104 [2112.11296]

    2022

  147. [155]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. Kälin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto,Bootstrapping the relativistic two-body problem, 2304.01275

  148. [156]

    Mogull, J

    G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff,Classical black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory, JHEP02 (2021) 048 [2010.02865]

    2021

  149. [157]

    G. U. Jakobsen and G. Mogull,Conservative and Radiative Dynamics of Spinning Bodies at Third Post-Minkowskian Order Using Worldline Quantum Field Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.128 (2022), no. 14, 141102 [2201.07778]

    2022

  150. [158]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff,SUSY in the sky with gravitons, JHEP 01 (2022) 027 [2109.04465]

    2022

  151. [159]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff,Gravitational Bremsstrahlung and Hidden Supersymmetry of Spinning Bodies, Phys. Rev. Lett.128 (2022), no. 1, 011101 [2106.10256]. – 79 –

    2022

  152. [160]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff,Classical Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from a Worldline Quantum Field Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021), no. 20, 201103 [2101.12688]

    2021

  153. [161]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and B. Sauer,All things retarded: radiation-reaction in worldline quantum field theory, JHEP10 (2022) 128 [2207.00569]

    2022

  154. [162]

    D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee and D. O’Connell,Amplitudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering, JHEP02 (2019) 137 [1811.10950]

    2019 arXiv

  155. [163]

    A. Aivazis. https://feynman.aivazis.com/

  156. [164]

    Passarino and M

    G. Passarino and M. J. G. Veltman,One Loop Corrections for e+ e- Annihilation Into mu+ mu- in the Weinberg Model, Nucl. Phys. B160 (1979) 151–207

    1979

  157. [165]

    V. A. Smirnov,Feynman Integral Calculus. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006. – 80 –

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed May 24, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.