Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Robust Hate Speech Detection in Social Media: A Cross-Dataset Empirical Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.01680 v1 pith:WHW7OT2B submitted 2023-07-04 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords detectionhatespeechdatasetsmodelsdatabiasescontribute
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The automatic detection of hate speech online is an active research area in NLP. Most of the studies to date are based on social media datasets that contribute to the creation of hate speech detection models trained on them. However, data creation processes contain their own biases, and models inherently learn from these dataset-specific biases. In this paper, we perform a large-scale cross-dataset comparison where we fine-tune language models on different hate speech detection datasets. This analysis shows how some datasets are more generalisable than others when used as training data. Crucially, our experiments show how combining hate speech detection datasets can contribute to the development of robust hate speech detection models. This robustness holds even when controlling by data size and compared with the best individual datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HateBench: Benchmarking Hate Speech Detectors on LLM-Generated Content and Hate Campaigns

    cs.CR 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HateBench shows current hate speech detectors miss a meaningful share of LLM-generated hate and are evaded by word-level edits, enabling automated hate campaigns.

  2. How Effectively Can BERT Models Interpret Context and Detect Bengali Communal Violent Text?

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Fine-tuned BanglaBERT and an ensemble of BERT variants achieve macro F1 scores of 0.60 and 0.63 for detecting Bengali communal violent text on a newly augmented dataset.

Pith tools