Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Tight Algorithmic Applications of Clique-Width Generalizations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.04628 v1 pith:YMJQ2DWW submitted 2023-07-10 cs.DS

Tight Algorithmic Applications of Clique-Width Generalizations

classification cs.DS
keywords clique-widthparametersfusion-widthalgorithmicalgorithmsapplicationsexponentialgeneralizations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we study two natural generalizations of clique-width introduced by Martin F\"urer. Multi-clique-width (mcw) allows every vertex to hold multiple labels [ITCS 2017], while for fusion-width (fw) we have a possibility to merge all vertices of a certain label [LATIN 2014]. F\"urer has shown that both parameters are upper-bounded by treewidth thus making them more appealing from an algorithmic perspective than clique-width and asked for applications of these parameters for problem solving. First, we determine the relation between these two parameters by showing that $\operatorname{mcw} \leq \operatorname{fw} + 1$. Then we show that when parameterized by multi-clique-width, many problems (e.g., Connected Dominating Set) admit algorithms with the same running time as for clique-width despite the exponential gap between these two parameters. For some problems (e.g., Hamiltonian Cycle) we show an analogous result for fusion-width: For this we present an alternative view on fusion-width by introducing so-called glue-expressions which might be interesting on their own. All algorithms obtained in this work are tight up to (Strong) Exponential Time Hypothesis.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Tight Bounds for some W[1]-hard Problems Parameterized by Multi-clique-width

    cs.DS 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Under ETH, Max Cut has no n^{2^{o(k)}} f(k) algorithm on multi-clique-width k graphs while Hamiltonian Cycle and Edge Dominating Set admit n^{O(k)} algorithms, showing differing tight bounds from clique-width.