REVIEW 1 cited by
Tight Algorithmic Applications of Clique-Width Generalizations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Tight Algorithmic Applications of Clique-Width Generalizations
read the original abstract
In this work, we study two natural generalizations of clique-width introduced by Martin F\"urer. Multi-clique-width (mcw) allows every vertex to hold multiple labels [ITCS 2017], while for fusion-width (fw) we have a possibility to merge all vertices of a certain label [LATIN 2014]. F\"urer has shown that both parameters are upper-bounded by treewidth thus making them more appealing from an algorithmic perspective than clique-width and asked for applications of these parameters for problem solving. First, we determine the relation between these two parameters by showing that $\operatorname{mcw} \leq \operatorname{fw} + 1$. Then we show that when parameterized by multi-clique-width, many problems (e.g., Connected Dominating Set) admit algorithms with the same running time as for clique-width despite the exponential gap between these two parameters. For some problems (e.g., Hamiltonian Cycle) we show an analogous result for fusion-width: For this we present an alternative view on fusion-width by introducing so-called glue-expressions which might be interesting on their own. All algorithms obtained in this work are tight up to (Strong) Exponential Time Hypothesis.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Tight Bounds for some W[1]-hard Problems Parameterized by Multi-clique-width
Under ETH, Max Cut has no n^{2^{o(k)}} f(k) algorithm on multi-clique-width k graphs while Hamiltonian Cycle and Edge Dominating Set admit n^{O(k)} algorithms, showing differing tight bounds from clique-width.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.