REVIEW 1 cited by
Accurate, Explainable, and Private Models: Providing Recourse While Minimizing Training Data Leakage
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Accurate, Explainable, and Private Models: Providing Recourse While Minimizing Training Data Leakage
read the original abstract
Machine learning models are increasingly utilized across impactful domains to predict individual outcomes. As such, many models provide algorithmic recourse to individuals who receive negative outcomes. However, recourse can be leveraged by adversaries to disclose private information. This work presents the first attempt at mitigating such attacks. We present two novel methods to generate differentially private recourse: Differentially Private Model (DPM) and Laplace Recourse (LR). Using logistic regression classifiers and real world and synthetic datasets, we find that DPM and LR perform well in reducing what an adversary can infer, especially at low FPR. When training dataset size is large enough, we find particular success in preventing privacy leakage while maintaining model and recourse accuracy with our novel LR method.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Quantifying the Privacy of Counterfactuals by Leveraging Membership Inference Attacks Against Synthetic Data
Membership inference attacks adapted from synthetic data succeed on counterfactuals using only the counterfactuals themselves, without model access.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.