Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Subjective visualization experiences: impact of visual design and experimental design

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.13713 v1 pith:NIDFFZ3I submitted 2023-10-13 cs.HC

Subjective visualization experiences: impact of visual design and experimental design

classification cs.HC
keywords designsubjectivedifferentexperienceexperiencesexperimentalchartcharts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In contrast to objectively measurable aspects (such as accuracy, reading speed, or memorability), the subjective experience of visualizations has only recently gained importance, and we have less experience how to measure it. We explore how subjective experience is affected by chart design using multiple experimental methods. We measure the effects of changes in color, orientation, and source annotation on the perceived readability and trustworthiness of simple bar charts. Three different experimental designs (single image rating, forced choice comparison, and semi-structured interviews) provide similar but different results. We find that these subjective experiences are different from what prior work on objective dimensions would predict. Seemingly inconsequential choices, like orientation, have large effects for some methods, indicating that study design alters decision-making strategies. Next to insights into the effect of chart design, we provide methodological insights, such as a suggested need to carefully isolate individual elements in charts to study subjective experiences.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. What Catches the Eye? A Conjoint Study of Infographic Design Preferences

    cs.HC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Conjoint analysis of infographic preferences on unemployment data shows comparison type (scales/benchmarks) accounts for 58.5% of preference variation, graphic type 29.2%, and color 12.3%.