REVIEW 3 cited by
CROMA: Remote Sensing Representations with Contrastive Radar-Optical Masked Autoencoders
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
CROMA: Remote Sensing Representations with Contrastive Radar-Optical Masked Autoencoders
read the original abstract
A vital and rapidly growing application, remote sensing offers vast yet sparsely labeled, spatially aligned multimodal data; this makes self-supervised learning algorithms invaluable. We present CROMA: a framework that combines contrastive and reconstruction self-supervised objectives to learn rich unimodal and multimodal representations. Our method separately encodes masked-out multispectral optical and synthetic aperture radar samples -- aligned in space and time -- and performs cross-modal contrastive learning. Another encoder fuses these sensors, producing joint multimodal encodings that are used to predict the masked patches via a lightweight decoder. We show that these objectives are complementary when leveraged on spatially aligned multimodal data. We also introduce X- and 2D-ALiBi, which spatially biases our cross- and self-attention matrices. These strategies improve representations and allow our models to effectively extrapolate to images up to 17.6x larger at test-time. CROMA outperforms the current SoTA multispectral model, evaluated on: four classification benchmarks -- finetuning (avg. 1.8%), linear (avg. 2.4%) and nonlinear (avg. 1.4%) probing, kNN classification (avg. 3.5%), and K-means clustering (avg. 8.4%); and three segmentation benchmarks (avg. 6.4%). CROMA's rich, optionally multimodal representations can be widely leveraged across remote sensing applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
The View From Space: Navigating Instrumentation Differences with EOFMs
EOFM embeddings are strongly partitioned by sensor architecture, so matching spectral bands is not enough to make cross-sensor embedding search reliable.
-
LunarFM: A Shared Multimodal Representation of the Moon's Surface
A self-supervised multimodal model fuses 18 channels from six lunar instruments into a shared 768-dimensional embedding per 0.5° chip, enabling mineral regression, similarity search, and geological-unit classification...
-
Scalable and Trustworthy Earth Observation Foundation Models
Remote-sensing foundation models need domain-specific design and evaluation around measurement physics and decision constraints; benchmark accuracy alone is insufficient for trustworthy EO deployment.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.