REVIEW 1 cited by
Post-Quantum Cryptography for Internet of Things: A Survey on Performance and Optimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Post-Quantum Cryptography for Internet of Things: A Survey on Performance and Optimization
read the original abstract
Due to recent development in quantum computing, the invention of a large quantum computer is no longer a distant future. Quantum computing severely threatens modern cryptography, as the hard mathematical problems beneath classic public-key cryptosystems can be solved easily by a sufficiently large quantum computer. As such, researchers have proposed PQC based on problems that even quantum computers cannot efficiently solve. Generally, post-quantum encryption and signatures can be hard to compute. This could potentially be a problem for IoT, which usually consist lightweight devices with limited computational power. In this paper, we survey existing literature on the performance for PQC in resource-constrained devices to understand the severeness of this problem. We also review recent proposals to optimize PQC algorithms for resource-constrained devices. Overall, we find that whilst PQC may be feasible for reasonably lightweight IoT, proposals for their optimization seem to lack standardization. As such, we suggest future research to seek coordination, in order to ensure an efficient and safe migration toward IoT for the post-quantum era.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Benchmarking NIST-Standardised ML-KEM and ML-DSA on ARM Cortex-M0+: Performance, Memory, and Energy on the RP2040
ML-KEM-512 finishes a full key exchange in 35.7 ms using 2.83 mJ on the RP2040 at 133 MHz, 17 times faster than ECDH P-256, with open-source code for all levels of both algorithms.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.