Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

PQA: Zero-shot Protein Question Answering for Free-form Scientific Enquiry with Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.13653 v2 pith:DBMHOSXA submitted 2024-02-21 cs.LG

PQA: Zero-shot Protein Question Answering for Free-form Scientific Enquiry with Large Language Models

classification cs.LG
keywords proteinpikacurrentlanguageresearchansweringdatasetdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Understanding protein structure and function is crucial in biology. However, current computational methods are often task-specific and resource-intensive. To address this, we propose zero-shot Protein Question Answering (PQA), a task designed to answer a wide range of protein-related queries without task-specific training. The success of PQA hinges on high-quality datasets and robust evaluation strategies, both of which are lacking in current research. Existing datasets suffer from biases, noise, and lack of evolutionary context, while current evaluation methods fail to accurately assess model performance. We introduce the Pika framework to overcome these limitations. Pika comprises a curated, debiased dataset tailored for PQA and a biochemically relevant benchmarking strategy. We also propose multimodal large language models as a strong baseline for PQA, leveraging their natural language processing and knowledge. This approach promises a more flexible and efficient way to explore protein properties, advancing protein research. Our comprehensive PQA framework, Pika, including dataset, code, and model checkpoints, is openly accessible on github.com/EMCarrami/Pika, promoting wider research in the field.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ProtStructQA: A Denotation Threshold in Protein Structural Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ProtStructQA is a new executable benchmark for protein structural QA that identifies a capability threshold between 1.7B and 4B parameter models where effective prompting strategies shift from tool use to chain-of-thought.

  2. VibeProteinBench: An Evaluation Benchmark for Language-interfaced Vibe Protein Design

    q-bio.QM 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    VibeProteinBench is a three-stage language-interfaced benchmark revealing that no current LLM performs strongly across recognition, engineering, and generation of proteins.

  3. VibeProteinBench: An Evaluation Benchmark for Language-interfaced Vibe Protein Design

    q-bio.QM 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    VibeProteinBench is a new benchmark evaluating LLMs on open-ended language-interfaced protein design across recognition, engineering, and generation, with no model showing strong performance in all areas.

  4. Knowledge before Reasoning: EC-Reason-Bench, a Training-Free Diagnostic Benchmark for LLM Enzyme Classification

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    For LLM enzyme classification, external homology evidence is what drives accuracy; reasoning wrappers add almost nothing on aggregate, giving opposite gains and losses on adversarial versus multi-functional enzyme splits.