pith. sign in

arxiv: 2404.19521 · v3 · submitted 2024-04-30 · 🌀 gr-qc

Existence of nonlinearly scalarized black holes in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theory with polynomial couplings

De-Cheng Zou , Xu Yang , Meng-Yun Lai , Hyat Huang , Bo Liu , Jutta Kunz , Yun Soo Myung , Rui-Hong Yue This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 01:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords nonlinear scalarizationEinstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theoryblack holespolynomial couplingsprobe limitbackreactionscalar haireffective potential
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nonlinearly scalarized black holes exist for polynomial couplings with ζ''(0)=0 in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theory.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies black holes in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity coupled through polynomial functions ζ(φ) that vanish to second order at zero and permit nonzero constant scalar values. For the couplings αφ^4 − βφ^8 and αφ^4 − βφ^6, Gaussian pulses above a threshold amplitude render Schwarzschild black holes unstable, allowing transitions to scalarized configurations; the pure quartic coupling leaves them stable. The authors build families of these nonlinearly scalarized solutions both in the probe limit, where patterns are universal, and with full backreaction, where the branches depend on the strength β. Treating the coupling term as an effective potential explains observed plateaus and divergences during time evolution.

Core claim

In Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theory with polynomial coupling functions ζ(φ) satisfying ζ''(0)=0, where ζ'(φ)=0 admits nonzero constant solutions φ_s, nonlinearly scalarized black holes exist as solution branches. For ζ(φ)=αφ^4−βφ^8 and ζ(φ)=αφ^4−βφ^6, Schwarzschild black holes become unstable above threshold Gaussian pulse amplitudes and transition to scalarized states, while for ζ(φ)=αφ^4 they remain stable. The term ζ(φ)R_GB^2 functions as an effective potential that accounts for plateaus and divergences in the evolution. Branches constructed in the probe limit display universal features, whereas inclusion of backreaction produces a distinct dependence on the coupling strength β.

What carries the argument

Polynomial coupling functions ζ(φ) with ζ''(0)=0 that admit constant scalar solutions φ_s ≠ 0, used to construct branches of nonlinearly scalarized black holes in the probe limit and with backreaction.

If this is right

  • Schwarzschild black holes are unstable to scalarization above threshold Gaussian pulse amplitudes for the couplings αφ^4−βφ^8 and αφ^4−βφ^6.
  • Solution branches of nonlinearly scalarized black holes exhibit universal patterns in the probe limit.
  • With backreaction included, the solution branches show a distinct dependence on the coupling strength β.
  • The coupling term ζ(φ)R_GB^2 treated as an effective potential explains plateaus and divergences seen in the time evolution.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The requirement that the coupling admit constant nonzero scalar solutions may generalize to other curvature-based modifications of gravity.
  • Different choices of the higher-order coefficients in the polynomial could systematically control the number and stability of scalarized branches.
  • The observed universal features in the probe limit suggest that backreaction effects could be approximated perturbatively for small β.

Load-bearing premise

The polynomial coupling functions are chosen such that their second derivative vanishes at zero and they admit nonzero constant scalar solutions.

What would settle it

Failure to numerically locate scalarized black hole branches for the couplings ζ(φ)=αφ^4−βφ^8 and ζ(φ)=αφ^4−βφ^6 in either the probe limit or with backreaction would falsify the existence claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2404.19521 by Bo Liu, De-Cheng Zou, Hyat Huang, Jutta Kunz, Meng-Yun Lai, Rui-Hong Yue, Xu Yang, Yun Soo Myung.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Time evolution of the scalar field on the SBH background with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Time evolution of the scalar field on the SBH background with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The effective potential V 3 eff for ζ3(ϕ) = 1 4 ϕ 4 for M = 1 and λ = 1. (a) Three￾dimensional plot of V 3 eff(r, ϕ) as a function of the scalar ϕ and the radial coordinate r. (b) Two-dimensional plot of V 3 eff(ϕ) as a function of ϕ for a fixed r. In contrast, the coupling function ζ1(ϕ) (and analogously ζ2(ϕ)) may lead to a saturation mechanism in the time evolution. For ζ1(ϕ) the effective potential tak… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Three-dimensional plot of the effective potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Zoomed figure for the effective potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Scalar field ϕH at the horizon, scalar charge Qs, and regularity parameter ∆ as functions of the mass M for the coupling function ζ1(ϕ) for α = 1/4, β = 0, λ = 1. Along this branch, the scalar field remains small. Thus, there is only little backreaction 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Scalar field ϕH at the horizon, scalar charge Qs, and regularity parameter ∆ as functions of the mass M for the coupling function ζ1(ϕ) for α = 1/4, β = 25/8, λ = 1. 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 r 0 2.50×10 9 5.00×10 9 7.50×10 9 1.00×10 10 R 2 (a) R2 K for point ‘1’ (X1, P1, Y 1) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 r 0 1.0×10 7 2.0×10 7 3.0×10 7 4.0×10 7 5.0×10 7 R 2 (b) R2 K for point ‘3’ ( X3, P3, Y 3) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Divergence of the Kretschmann scalar R2 K of scalarized black holes with ζ1(ϕ) and β = 25/8. The vertical dashed lines indicate the horizon radius. (a): R2 K for rH ≈ 0.03450 and M ≈ 0.02344. (b): R2 K for rH ≈ 0.1265 and M ≈ 0.07839. The solid curve in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Scalar field ϕH at the horizon, scalar charge Qs and regularity parameter ∆ as functions of the mass M for the coupling function ζ1(ϕ) for α = 1/4, β = 100/8, λ = 1. For intermediate values of β, e.g., for β = 100/8, the number of branches can still be three, as seen in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Scalar field ϕH at the horizon, scalar charge Qs and regularity parameter ∆ as functions of the mass M for the coupling function ζ1(ϕ) for α = 1/4, β = 1000/8, λ = 1. For sufficiently large values of β such as β = 1000/8, the pattern is very similar to the probe limit. Thus there exist only two branches of scalarized black hole solutions. The primary branch (solid line) starts from ϕH ≈ 0.1778 = ϕs and a … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Regularity parameter ∆ as a function of the mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Profile functions of the scalarized black hole on the primary branch and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Profile functions of the scalarized black hole on the lower branch and the SBH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Scalar field ϕH at the horizon and scalar charge Qs as functions of the mass M for two coupling functions ζ1(ϕ) and ζ2(ϕ) for α = 1/4, β = 1000/8, λ = 1. 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 r 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 m e t ric fu n c tio n s A(r) B(r) * 0.75 f(r) (a) A(r), B(r) and f(r) vs r 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 r 0.0006 0.0004 0.0002 0.0000 0.0002 0.0004 m e t ric d e via tio n s A(r) B(r) (b) δA(r) and δB(r) vs … view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Profile functions of the scalarized black hole and SBH with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Scalar field ϕH at the horizon and scalar charge Qs as functions of the mass M for the exponential coupling function ζex(ϕ) = 1 4κ  1 − e −κϕ4  with κ = 1000/8. 0.000 0.025 0.050 0.075 0.100 M 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 H 1( ), = 1000/8 ex( ), = 1000 (a) ϕH vs M 0.000 0.025 0.050 0.075 0.100 M 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 Q s 1( ), = 1000/8 ex( ), = 1000 (b) Qs vs M [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: compares the ϕH-M and Qs-M relations for the exponential coupling function and the corresponding polynomial one for β = κ = 1000/8. As expected, their lower branches largely overlap until the higher nonlinearities become relevant. The shape of the Qs-M relations remains analogous for both coupling functions, and the pattern of the splitting of the two branches into three branches for smaller values of β =… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Nonlinearly scalarized black holes are investigated in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet (EsGB) theory with polynomial coupling functions $\zeta(\phi)$ satisfying $\zeta''(0) = 0$, where $\zeta'(\phi) = 0$ features besides $\phi=0$ solutions with constant $\phi_{\rm s} \ne 0$. We determine the threshold amplitudes for Gaussian pulses, above which Schwarzschild black holes (SBHs) %become unstable and may transition to scalarized black holes for two coupling functions: $\zeta(\phi)=\alpha\phi^4-\beta\phi^8$ and $\zeta(\phi)=\alpha\phi^4-\beta\phi^6$. In contrast, for the quartic coupling function $\zeta(\phi)=\alpha\phi^4$ SBHs are stable. Treating $\zeta(\phi)R_{GB}^2$ as an effective potential $V_\text{eff}$ provides an explanation for the ``plateau" and the divergence observed in the time evolution. We then construct the branches of nonlinearly scalarized black holes in the probe limit and with backreaction. While the pattern of the solution branches in the probe limit exhibits universal features, the presence of backreaction reveals a distinct dependence on the coupling strength $\beta$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates nonlinear scalarization of Schwarzschild black holes in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theory for two explicit polynomial couplings, ζ(φ)=αφ⁴−βφ⁸ and ζ(φ)=αφ⁴−βφ⁶, chosen so that ζ''(0)=0 while ζ'(φ)=0 admits nonzero constant roots φ_s. It reports threshold amplitudes for Gaussian initial data above which time evolution produces scalarized solutions, uses an effective-potential interpretation for observed plateaus and divergences, and constructs the corresponding static branches both in the probe limit (universal pattern) and with backreaction (β-dependent). The pure quartic coupling yields stable Schwarzschild solutions.

Significance. If the numerical constructions hold, the work supplies concrete existence results for nonlinearly scalarized black holes in EsGB theory outside the linear tachyonic regime. The contrast between universal probe-limit branches and backreaction-induced β dependence, together with the effective-potential heuristic, provides useful interpretive insight. The paper earns credit for explicit branch construction in both limits and for restricting attention to couplings that satisfy the stated algebraic conditions rather than claiming generality.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states that thresholds and branches are determined numerically, yet the manuscript does not appear to include a dedicated methods subsection specifying the discretization scheme, grid resolution, convergence tests, or error estimates used for the time evolutions and static solutions; adding this would strengthen verifiability of the central existence claims.
  2. Figure captions and text should explicitly state the ranges of α and β explored and whether results are shown for representative values or across a scan; this affects assessment of the reported β dependence with backreaction.
  3. The phrase 'universal features' in the probe-limit branch pattern is used without a precise definition; a short clarification of what is meant by universality (e.g., independence of β or scaling collapse) would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. The referee's summary correctly captures the scope and results of the work on nonlinear scalarization in EsGB theory with the specified polynomial couplings.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; numerical constructions are independent of inputs

full rationale

The paper selects explicit polynomial couplings satisfying ζ''(0)=0 and admitting nonzero constant roots of ζ'(φ) as model setup, then numerically evolves Gaussian pulses to find instability thresholds and constructs static branches in probe limit and with backreaction. These steps solve the field equations directly for the chosen ζ(φ); no parameter is fitted to a data subset and then relabeled as a prediction, no result is defined in terms of itself, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported via self-citation. The reported universal probe-limit patterns and β-dependent backreaction effects follow from the explicit integrations rather than reducing to the input assumptions by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard EsGB action with chosen polynomial couplings and on numerical techniques for evolution and branch finding; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • α
    Coupling amplitude of the quartic term in ζ(φ)
  • β
    Coupling amplitude of the higher-order term in ζ(φ)
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The theory is defined by the Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet action with polynomial coupling ζ(φ)
    Foundational setup invoked throughout the abstract

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5792 in / 1292 out tokens · 69175 ms · 2026-05-24T01:47:42.400368+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Spin-Induced Nonlinear Scalarization of Kerr Black Holes in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Kerr black holes in an EsGB model without linear instability undergo nonlinear scalarization above spin 0.5, existing in a finite low-mass high-spin wedge rather than a narrow band.

  2. Thermodynamics and phase transitions of nonlinearly scalarized black holes in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theory

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Nonlinearly scalarized black holes in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theory undergo a first-order phase transition from Schwarzschild black holes with non-zero latent heat.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 13 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Exact solutions of Einstein conformal scalar equations,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Exact solutions of Einstein conformal scalar equations,” Annals Phys.82, 535 (1974)

    work page 1974

  2. [2]

    Black Holes with Scalar Charge,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Black Holes with Scalar Charge,” Annals Phys.91, 75 (1975)

    work page 1975

  3. [3]

    Instability of Black Holes with Scalar Charge,

    K. A. Bronnikov and Y. .N. Kireev, “Instability of Black Holes with Scalar Charge,” Phys. Lett. A67, 95 (1978)

    work page 1978

  4. [4]

    Novel ‘‘no-scalar-hair’’ theorem for black holes,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Novel ‘‘no-scalar-hair’’ theorem for black holes,” Phys. Rev. D51 (1995) no.12, R6608

    work page 1995

  5. [5]

    C. A. R. Herdeiro and E. Radu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24, no.09, 1542014 (2015) [arXiv:1504.08209 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  6. [6]

    Nonperturbative strong field effects in tensor - scalar theories of gravitation,

    T. Damour and G. Esposito-Farese, “Nonperturbative strong field effects in tensor - scalar theories of gravitation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.70(1993), 2220-2223

    work page 1993

  7. [7]

    New Gauss-Bonnet black holes with curvature induced scalarization in the extended scalar-tensor theories

    D. D. Doneva and S. S. Yazadjiev, “New Gauss-Bonnet Black Holes with Curvature- Induced Scalarization in Extended Scalar-Tensor Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett.120, no.13, 131103 (2018) [arXiv:1711.01187 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Spontaneous scalarization of black holes and compact stars from a Gauss-Bonnet coupling

    H. O. Silva, J. Sakstein, L. Gualtieri, T. P. Sotiriou and E. Berti, “Spontaneous scalar- ization of black holes and compact stars from a Gauss-Bonnet coupling,” Phys. Rev. Lett.120, no.13, 131104 (2018) [arXiv:1711.02080 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    Evasion of No-Hair Theorems and Novel Black-Hole Solutions in Gauss-Bonnet Theories

    G. Antoniou, A. Bakopoulos and P. Kanti, “Evasion of No-Hair Theorems and Novel Black-Hole Solutions in Gauss-Bonnet Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett.120, no.13, 131102 (2018) [arXiv:1711.03390 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  10. [10]

    Black-Hole Solutions with Scalar Hair in Einstein-Scalar-Gauss-Bonnet Theories

    G. Antoniou, A. Bakopoulos and P. Kanti, “Black-Hole Solutions with Scalar Hair in Einstein-Scalar-Gauss-Bonnet Theories,” Phys. Rev. D97(2018) no.8, 084037 [arXiv:1711.07431 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    J. L. Bl´ azquez-Salcedo, D. D. Doneva, J. Kunz and S. S. Yazadjiev, Phys. Rev. D98, 084011 (2018) [arXiv:1805.05755 [gr-qc]]. 24

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Gregory-Laflamme instability of black hole in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theories

    Y. S. Myung and D. C. Zou, “Gregory-Laflamme instability of black hole in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theories,” Phys. Rev. D98, no. 2, 024030 (2018) [arXiv:1805.05023 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    H. O. Silva, C. F. B. Macedo, T. P. Sotiriou, L. Gualtieri, J. Sakstein and E. Berti, Phys. Rev. D99, 064011 (2019) [arXiv:1812.05590 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    C. F. B. Macedo, J. Sakstein, E. Berti, L. Gualtieri, H. O. Silva and T. P. Sotiriou, Phys. Rev. D99, 104041 (2019) [arXiv:1903.06784 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    P. V. P. Cunha, C. A. R. Herdeiro and E. Radu, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 011101 (2019) [arXiv:1904.09997 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    L. G. Collodel, B. Kleihaus, J. Kunz and E. Berti, Class. Quant. Grav.37, 075018 (2020) [arXiv:1912.05382 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    C. F. B. Macedo, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D29, 2041006 (2020) [arXiv:2002.12719 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    J. L. Bl´ azquez-Salcedo, D. D. Doneva, S. Kahlen, J. Kunz, P. Nedkova and S. S. Yazad- jiev, Phys. Rev. D101, 104006 (2020) [arXiv:2003.02862 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    J. L. Bl´ azquez-Salcedo, D. D. Doneva, S. Kahlen, J. Kunz, P. Nedkova and S. S. Yazad- jiev, Phys. Rev. D102, 024086 (2020) [arXiv:2006.06006 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    A. Dima, E. Barausse, N. Franchini and T. P. Sotiriou, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 231101 (2020) [arXiv:2006.03095 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    Hod, Phys

    S. Hod, Phys. Rev. D102, 084060 (2020) [arXiv:2006.09399 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    D. D. Doneva, L. G. Collodel, C. J. Kr¨ uger and S. S. Yazadjiev, Phys. Rev. D102, 104027 (2020) [arXiv:2008.07391 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    C. A. R. Herdeiro, E. Radu, H. O. Silva, T. P. Sotiriou and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 011103 (2021) [arXiv:2009.03904 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Berti, L

    E. Berti, L. G. Collodel, B. Kleihaus and J. Kunz, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 011104 (2021) [arXiv:2009.03905 [gr-qc]]. 25

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Spontaneous scalarisation of charged black holes

    C. A. R. Herdeiro, E. Radu, N. Sanchis-Gual and J. A. Font, “Spontaneous Scalar- ization of Charged Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, no.10, 101102 (2018) [arXiv:1806.05190 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    Spontaneous Scalarisation of Charged Black Holes: Coupling Dependence and Dy- namical Features,

    P. G. S. Fernandes, C. A. R. Herdeiro, A. M. Pombo, E. Radu and N. Sanchis-Gual, “Spontaneous Scalarisation of Charged Black Holes: Coupling Dependence and Dy- namical Features,” Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019) no.13, 134002 [erratum: Class. Quant. Grav.37(2020) no.4, 049501] [arXiv:1902.05079 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    Instability of Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m black hole in Einstein-Maxwell-scalar theory

    Y. S. Myung and D. C. Zou, “Instability of Reissner–Nordstr¨ om black hole in Einstein- Maxwell-scalar theory,” Eur. Phys. J. C79, no. 3, 273 (2019) [arXiv:1808.02609 [gr- qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  28. [28]

    Radial perturbations of the scalarized black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-conformally coupled scalar theory,

    D. C. Zou and Y. S. Myung, “Radial perturbations of the scalarized black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-conformally coupled scalar theory,” Phys. Rev. D102, no. 6, 064011 (2020) [arXiv:2005.06677 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    Quasinormal modes of scalarized black holes in the Einstein-Maxwell-Scalar theory

    Y. S. Myung and D. C. Zou, “Quasinormal modes of scalarized black holes in the Einstein–Maxwell–Scalar theory,” Phys. Lett. B790(2019), 400-407 [arXiv:1812.03604 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  30. [30]

    M. Y. Lai, Y. S. Myung, R. H. Yue and D. C. Zou, Phys. Rev. D106, no.8, 084043 (2022) [arXiv:2208.11849 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    G. Guo, P. Wang, H. Wu and H. Yang, JHEP10, 076 (2023) [arXiv:2307.12210 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Scalarization of planar anti–de Sitter charged black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-scalar theory,

    C. Promsiri, T. Tangphati, E. Hirunsirisawat and S. Ponglertsakul, “Scalarization of planar anti–de Sitter charged black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-scalar theory,” Phys. Rev. D108(2023) no.2, 024015 [arXiv:2302.04654 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Beyond the spontaneous scalarization: New fully nonlinear mechanism for the formation of scalarized black holes and its dynamical development,

    D. D. Doneva and S. S. Yazadjiev, “Beyond the spontaneous scalarization: New fully nonlinear mechanism for the formation of scalarized black holes and its dynamical development,” Phys. Rev. D105(2022) no.4, L041502 [arXiv:2107.01738 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Nonlinear instability and scalar clouds of spherical exotic compact objects in scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theory,

    S. J. Zhang, “Nonlinear instability and scalar clouds of spherical exotic compact objects in scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theory,” Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) no.10, 950 [arXiv:2304.08092 [gr-qc]]. 26

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Mixed scalarization of charged black holes: From spontaneous to nonlinear scalarization,

    Z. Belkhadria and A. M. Pombo, “Mixed scalarization of charged black holes: From spontaneous to nonlinear scalarization,” Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.4, 044014 [arXiv:2311.15850 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    J. L. Bl´ azquez-Salcedo, D. D. Doneva, J. Kunz and S. S. Yazadjiev, Phys. Rev. D105, 124005 (2022)

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Effects of mass and self-interaction on nonlinear scalarization of scalar-Gauss-Bonnet black holes,

    A. M. Pombo and D. D. Doneva, “Effects of mass and self-interaction on nonlinear scalarization of scalar-Gauss-Bonnet black holes,” Phys. Rev. D108(2023) no.12, 124068 [arXiv:2310.08638 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    Nonlinear black hole scalarization in multi-scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity,

    K. V. Staykov and D. D. Doneva, “Nonlinear black hole scalarization in multi-scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser.2719(2024) no.1, 012007

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Multiscalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity: Scalarized black holes beyond spontaneous scalarization,

    K. V. Staykov and D. D. Doneva, “Multiscalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity: Scalarized black holes beyond spontaneous scalarization,” Phys. Rev. D106(2022) no.10, 104064 [arXiv:2209.01038 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Nonlinear scalar- ization of Schwarzschild black holes in scalar-torsion teleparallel gravity,

    P. A. Gonz´ alez, E. Papantonopoulos, J. Robledo and Y. V´ asquez, “Nonlinear scalar- ization of Schwarzschild black holes in scalar-torsion teleparallel gravity,” Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.4, 044064 [arXiv:2407.13557 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Spontaneous nonlinear scalarization of Kerr black holes,

    D. D. Doneva, L. G. Collodel and S. S. Yazadjiev, “Spontaneous nonlinear scalarization of Kerr black holes,” Phys. Rev. D106(2022) no.10, 104027 [arXiv:2208.02077 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    Nonlinearly scalarized rotating black holes in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theory,

    M. Y. Lai, D. C. Zou, R. H. Yue and Y. S. Myung, “Nonlinearly scalarized rotating black holes in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theory,” Phys. Rev. D108(2023) no.8, 084007 [arXiv:2304.08012 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    Non-linearly scalarized supermassive black holes,

    S. Liu, Y. Liu, Y. Peng and C. Y. Zhang, “Non-linearly scalarized supermassive black holes,” Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) no.12, 1370 [arXiv:2509.17892 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    The rotating solutions beyond the spontaneous scalarization in Einstein-Maxwell-scalar theory,

    W. Xiong, C. Y. Zhang and P. C. Li, “The rotating solutions beyond the spontaneous scalarization in Einstein-Maxwell-scalar theory,” [arXiv:2312.11879 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D15(1977), 2752-2756 27

    work page 1977

  46. [46]

    Black holes in the Einstein-Born-Infeld- Weyl gravity,

    D. C. Zou, C. Wu, M. Zhang and R. H. Yue, “Black holes in the Einstein-Born-Infeld- Weyl gravity,” EPL128(2019) no.4, 40006

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Phase transitions of scalarized Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet Black Holes,

    C. Herdeiro, H. Huang, J. Kunz, M.-Y. Lai, E. Radu, D.-C. Zou, “Phase transitions of scalarized Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet Black Holes,” in preparation 28

    work page