Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Conformal Classification with Equalized Coverage for Adaptively Selected Groups

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.15106 v2 pith:7G3A4LXQ submitted 2024-05-23 stat.ML cs.LG

Conformal Classification with Equalized Coverage for Adaptively Selected Groups

classification stat.ML cs.LG
keywords coverageadaptivelyclassificationconformalequalizedfeaturesgroupsmethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper introduces a conformal inference method to evaluate uncertainty in classification by generating prediction sets with valid coverage conditional on adaptively chosen features. These features are carefully selected to reflect potential model limitations or biases. This can be useful to find a practical compromise between efficiency -- by providing informative predictions -- and algorithmic fairness -- by ensuring equalized coverage for the most sensitive groups. We demonstrate the validity and effectiveness of this method on simulated and real data sets.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Socio-Conformal Calibration in Complex Survey Data: Marginal Validity Is Not Enough for Subgroup Reliability

    stat.ME 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Standard conformal prediction gives nominal overall coverage on Pew survey data but leaves ~13-point weighted gaps across race-education subgroups, and group-specific Mondrian calibration does not reliably close them.