Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

Before Generation, Align it! A Novel and Effective Strategy for Mitigating Hallucinations in Text-to-SQL Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.15307 v1 pith:IDAK5TLM submitted 2024-05-24 cs.CL

Ge Qu , Jinyang Li , Bowen Li , Bowen Qin , Nan Huo , Chenhao Ma , Reynold Cheng This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CL
keywords hallucinationsllmstext-to-sqlframeworkstrategyeffectivegeneralizationgeneration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) driven by In-Context Learning (ICL) have significantly improved the performance of text-to-SQL. Previous methods generally employ a two-stage reasoning framework, namely 1) schema linking and 2) logical synthesis, making the framework not only effective but also interpretable. Despite these advancements, the inherent bad nature of the generalization of LLMs often results in hallucinations, which limits the full potential of LLMs. In this work, we first identify and categorize the common types of hallucinations at each stage in text-to-SQL. We then introduce a novel strategy, Task Alignment (TA), designed to mitigate hallucinations at each stage. TA encourages LLMs to take advantage of experiences from similar tasks rather than starting the tasks from scratch. This can help LLMs reduce the burden of generalization, thereby mitigating hallucinations effectively. We further propose TA-SQL, a text-to-SQL framework based on this strategy. The experimental results and comprehensive analysis demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of our framework. Specifically, it enhances the performance of the GPT-4 baseline by 21.23% relatively on BIRD dev and it yields significant improvements across six models and four mainstream, complex text-to-SQL benchmarks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Automatic Metadata Extraction for Text-to-SQL

    cs.DB 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM-generated summaries of database profiling statistics outperform human-written metadata for text-to-SQL on BIRD, and a SQL-generation-based schema linker adds further gains.

  2. X-SQL: Expert Schema Linking and Understanding of Text-to-SQL with Multi-LLMs

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    X-SQL, an expert schema-linking and schema-understanding framework, achieves 84.9% and 82.5% execution accuracy on Spider-Dev and Spider-Test using open-source LLMs.

  3. Pi-SQL: Enhancing Text-to-SQL with Fine-Grained Guidance from Pivot Programming Languages

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Generating Python programs as intermediate guidance before SQL, then voting on Python execution results to select the fastest matching SQL, improves text-to-SQL execution accuracy and efficiency on BIRD and Archer.

  4. Towards Automated Cross-domain Exploratory Data Analysis through Large Language Models

    cs.DB 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    TiInsight automates cross-domain data exploration by summarizing database schemas with LLMs, generating SQL, and recommending charts, achieving 86.3% execution accuracy on Spider and state-of-the-art results on Bird.

  5. PSM-SQL: Progressive Schema Learning with Multi-granularity Semantics for Text-to-SQL

    cs.DB 2025-02 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    PSM-SQL iteratively filters tables and columns for text-to-SQL, but its best reported numbers come from a two-module ablation, not from the full three-level multi-granularity method described in the paper.

  6. Hallucination by Code Generation LLMs: Taxonomy, Benchmarks, Mitigation, and Challenges

    cs.SE 2025-04 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    This survey organizes code-LLM hallucinations into four types, reviews 52 related papers, and identifies open challenges in detection and mitigation.

Pith tools