REVIEW 1 cited by
Improved Lower Bounds on the Expected Length of Longest Common Subsequences
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Improved Lower Bounds on the Expected Length of Longest Common Subsequences
read the original abstract
It has been proven that, when normalized by $n$, the expected length of a longest common subsequence of $d$ random strings of length $n$ over an alphabet of size $\sigma$ converges to some constant that depends only on $d$ and $\sigma$. These values are known as the Chv\'{a}tal-Sankoff constants, and determining their exact values is a well-known open problem. Upper and lower bounds are known for some combinations of $\sigma$ and $d$, with the best lower and upper bounds for the most studied case, $\sigma=2, d=2$, at $0.788071$ and $0.826280$, respectively. Building off previous algorithms for lower-bounding the constants, we implement runtime optimizations, parallelization, and an efficient memory reading and writing scheme to obtain an improved lower bound of $0.792665992$ for $\sigma=2, d=2$. We additionally improve upon almost all previously reported lower bounds for the Chv\'{a}tal-Sankoff constants when either the size of alphabet, the number of strings, or both are larger than 2.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Random Subsequence Model and Uniform Codes for the Deletion Channel
Uniformly random codes achieve positive rate in the deletion channel for all deletion probabilities p<1, via strict separations between annealed and quenched free energies in a new Random Subsequence Model that also y...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.