Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Large-scale cosmic ray anisotropies with 19 years of data from the Pierre Auger Observatory

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.05292 v3 pith:AN6KYDQP submitted 2024-08-09 astro-ph.HE

The Pierre Auger Collaboration: A. Abdul Halim , P. Abreu , M. Aglietta , I. Allekotte , K. Almeida Cheminant , A. Almela , R. Aloisio , J. Alvarez-Muñiz
show 349 more authors
A. Ambrosone J. Ammerman Yebra G.A. Anastasi L. Anchordoqui B. Andrada L. Andrade Dourado S. Andringa L. Apollonio C. Aramo P.R. Araújo Ferreira E. Arnone J.C. Arteaga Velázquez P. Assis G. Avila E. Avocone A. Bakalova F. Barbato A. Bartz Mocellin J.A. Bellido C. Berat M.E. Bertaina G. Bhatta M. Bianciotto P.L. Biermann V. Binet K. Bismark T. Bister J. Biteau J. Blazek C. Bleve J. Blümer M. Boháčová D. Boncioli C. Bonifazi L. Bonneau Arbeletche N. Borodai J. Brack P.G. Brichetto Orchera F.L. Briechle A. Bueno S. Buitink M. Buscemi M. Büsken A. Bwembya K.S. Caballero-Mora S. Cabana-Freire L. Caccianiga F. Campuzano R. Caruso A. Castellina F. Catalani G. Cataldi L. Cazon M. Cerda B. Čermáková A. Cermenati J.A. Chinellato J. Chudoba L. Chytka R.W. Clay A.C. Cobos Cerutti R. Colalillo R. Conceição A. Condorelli G. Consolati M. Conte F. Convenga D. Correia dos Santos P.J. Costa C.E. Covault M. Cristinziani C.S. Cruz Sanchez S. Dasso K. Daumiller B.R. Dawson R.M. de Almeida B. de Errico J. de Jesús S.J. de Jong J.R.T. de Mello Neto I. De Mitri J. de Oliveira D. de Oliveira Franco F. de Palma V. de Souza E. De Vito A. Del Popolo O. Deligny N. Denner L. Deval A. di Matteo C. Dobrigkeit J.C. D'Olivo L.M. Domingues Mendes Q. Dorosti J.C. dos Anjos R.C. dos Anjos J. Ebr F. Ellwanger M. Emam R. Engel I. Epicoco M. Erdmann A. Etchegoyen C. Evoli H. Falcke G. Farrar A.C. Fauth T. Fehler F. Feldbusch A. Fernandes B. Fick J.M. Figueira P. Filip A. Filipčič T. Fitoussi B. Flaggs T. Fodran M. Freitas T. Fujii A. Fuster C. Galea B. García C. Gaudu P.L. Ghia U. Giaccari F. Gobbi F. Gollan G. Golup M. Gómez Berisso P.F. Gómez Vitale J.P. Gongora J.M. González N. González D. Góra A. Gorgi M. Gottowik F. Guarino G.P. Guedes E. Guido L. Gülzow S. Hahn P. Hamal M.R. Hampel P. Hansen V.M. Harvey A. Haungs T. Hebbeker C. Hojvat J.R. Hörandel P. Horvath M. Hrabovský T. Huege A. Insolia P.G. Isar P. Janecek V. Jilek J. Jurysek K.-H. Kampert B. Keilhauer A. Khakurdikar V.V. Kizakke Covilakam H.O. Klages M. Kleifges F. Knapp J. Köhler F. Krieger M. Kubatova N. Kunka B.L. Lago N. Langner M.A. Leigui de Oliveira Y. Lema-Capeans A. Letessier-Selvon I. Lhenry-Yvon L. Lopes J.P. Lundquist A. Machado Payeras D. Mandat B.C. Manning P. Mantsch F.M. Mariani A.G. Mariazzi I.C. Mariş G. Marsella D. Martello S. Martinelli O. Martínez Bravo M.A. Martins H.-J. Mathes J. Matthews G. Matthiae E. Mayotte S. Mayotte P.O. Mazur G. Medina-Tanco J. Meinert D. Melo A. Menshikov C. Merx S. Michal M.I. Micheletti L. Miramonti S. Mollerach F. Montanet L. Morejon K. Mulrey R. Mussa W.M. Namasaka S. Negi L. Nellen K. Nguyen G. Nicora M. Niechciol D. Nitz D. Nosek V. Novotny L. Nožka A. Nucita L.A. Núñez C. Oliveira M. Palatka J. Pallotta S. Panja G. Parente T. Paulsen J. Pawlowsky M. Pech J. Pękala R. Pelayo V. Pelgrims L.A.S. Pereira E.E. Pereira Martins C. Pérez Bertolli L. Perrone S. Petrera C. Petrucci T. Pierog M. Pimenta M. Platino B. Pont M. Pothast M. Pourmohammad Shahvar P. Privitera M. Prouza S. Querchfeld J. Rautenberg D. Ravignani J.V. Reginatto Akim A. Reuzki J. Ridky F. Riehn M. Risse V. Rizi E. Rodriguez J. Rodriguez Rojo M.J. Roncoroni S. Rossoni M. Roth E. Roulet A.C. Rovero A. Saftoiu M. Saharan F. Salamida H. Salazar G. Salina P. Sampathkumar J.D. Sanabria Gomez F. Sánchez E.M. Santos E. Santos F. Sarazin R. Sarmento R. Sato C.M. Schäfer V. Scherini H. Schieler M. Schimassek M. Schimp D. Schmidt O. Scholten H. Schoorlemmer P. Schovánek F.G. Schröder J. Schulte T. Schulz S.J. Sciutto M. Scornavacche A. Sedoski A. Segreto S. Sehgal S.U. Shivashankara G. Sigl K. Simkova F. Simon R. Šmída P. Sommers R. Squartini M. Stadelmaier S. Stanič J. Stasielak P. Stassi S. Strähnz M. Straub T. Suomijärvi A.D. Supanitsky Z. Svozilikova Z. Szadkowski F. Tairli A. Tapia C. Taricco C. Timmermans O. Tkachenko P. Tobiska C.J. Todero Peixoto B. Tomé Z. Torrès A. Travaini P. Travnicek M. Tueros M. Unger R. Uzeiroska L. Vaclavek M. Vacula J.F. Valdés Galicia L. Valore E. Varela V. Vašíčková A. Vásquez-Ramírez D. Veberič I.D. Vergara Quispe V. Verzi J. Vicha J. Vink S. Vorobiov C. Watanabe A.A. Watson A. Weindl M. Weitz L. Wiencke H. Wilczyński D. Wittkowski B. Wundheiler B. Yue A. Yushkov O. Zapparrata E. Zas D. Zavrtanik M. Zavrtanik
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords abovedipoleobservatoryresultsamplitudeanisotropiesaugercosmic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Results are presented for the measurement of large-scale anisotropies in the arrival directions of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays detected at the Pierre Auger Observatory during 19 years of operation, prior to AugerPrime, the upgrade of the Observatory. The 3D dipole amplitude and direction are reconstructed above $4\,$EeV in four energy bins. Besides the established dipolar anisotropy in right ascension above $8\,$EeV, the Fourier amplitude of the $8$ to $16\,$EeV energy bin is now also above the $5\sigma$ discovery level. No time variation of the dipole moment above $8\,$EeV is found, setting an upper limit to the rate of change of such variations of $0.3\%$ per year at the $95\%$ confidence level. Additionally, the results for the angular power spectrum are shown, demonstrating no other statistically significant multipoles. The results for the equatorial dipole component down to $0.03\,$EeV are presented, using for the first time a data set obtained with a trigger that has been optimized for lower energies. Finally, model predictions are discussed and compared with observations, based on two source emission scenarios obtained in the combined fit of spectrum and composition above $0.6\,$EeV.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. New full-sky studies of the distribution of ultra-high-energy cosmic-ray arrival directions

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Full-sky UHECR arrival directions remain most correlated with starburst galaxies (4.2 sigma post-trial) after adding Telescope Array data, atmospheric corrections, and a new harmonic-space analysis.

  2. The Large Magellanic Cloud as a source of the highest energy cosmic rays

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The five most energetic Auger cosmic rays cluster in a small sky region, and the Large Magellanic Cloud is a closer angular match than Centaurus A to that cluster.

  3. Measurement of the cosmic-ray energy spectrum above 2.5 EeV using 19 years of operation of the Pierre Auger Observatory

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    After 19 years of data, the combined Auger spectrum confirms the instep feature in the ultra-high-energy cosmic-ray flux at 5.5-sigma significance.

  4. The Global Cosmic Ray Observatory -- Challenging next-generation multi-messenger astronomy with interdisciplinary research

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    GCOS is proposed as a 60,000 km2 cosmic-ray observatory that would boost exposure tenfold and enable charged-particle astronomy, though this paper only restates the design goals.

  5. Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays

    astro-ph.HE 2025-05 unverdicted

    A comprehensive review concluding that UHECRs are likely heavy nuclei and that accretion shocks and jets are the most promising sources, with no new experimental results.

Pith tools