REVIEW 1 cited by
Atari-GPT: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models as Low-Level Policies in Atari Games
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Atari-GPT: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models as Low-Level Policies in Atari Games
read the original abstract
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have expanded their capabilities beyond traditional text-based tasks to multimodal domains, integrating visual, auditory, and textual data. While multimodal LLMs have been extensively explored for high-level planning in domains like robotics and games, their potential as low-level controllers remains largely untapped. In this paper, we introduce a novel benchmark aimed at testing the emergent capabilities of multimodal LLMs as low-level policies in Atari games. Unlike traditional reinforcement learning (RL) methods that require training for each new environment and reward function specification, these LLMs utilize pre-existing multimodal knowledge to directly engage with game environments. Our study assesses the performances of multiple multimodal LLMs against traditional RL agents, human players, and random agents, focusing on their ability to understand and interact with complex visual scenes and formulate strategic responses. Our results show that these multimodal LLMs are not yet capable of being zero-shot low-level policies. Furthermore, we see that this is, in part, due to their visual and spatial reasoning. Additional results and videos are available on our project webpage: https://dev1nw.github.io/atari-gpt/.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Playing ZendoWorld: Challenging AI Agents on Active Visual Concept Induction
ZendoWorld shows that high labeling accuracy does not equal rule recovery, perception and induction are separate bottlenecks, and VLM agents propose near-uninformative experiments on active visual concept induction.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.