REVIEW 4 cited by
Vision Language Models See What You Want but not What You See
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Vision Language Models See What You Want but not What You See
read the original abstract
Knowing others' intentions and taking others' perspectives are two core components of human intelligence that are considered to be instantiations of theory-of-mind. Infiltrating machines with these abilities is an important step towards building human-level artificial intelligence. Here, to investigate intentionality understanding and level-2 perspective-taking in Vision Language Models (VLMs), we constructed the IntentBench and PerspectBench, which together contains over 300 cognitive experiments grounded in real-world scenarios and classic cognitive tasks. We found VLMs achieving high performance on intentionality understanding but low performance on level-2 perspective-taking. This suggests a potential dissociation between simulation-based and theory-based theory-of-mind abilities in VLMs, highlighting the concern that they are not capable of using model-based reasoning to infer others' mental states.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Beyond Localization: A Comprehensive Diagnosis of Perspective-Conditioned Spatial Reasoning in MLLMs from Omnidirectional Images
MLLMs exhibit a large perception-reasoning gap on perspective-conditioned spatial reasoning in omnidirectional images, with accuracy falling from 57% on basic direction tasks to under 1% on compositional reasoning, th...
-
Beyond Localization: A Comprehensive Diagnosis of Perspective-Conditioned Spatial Reasoning in MLLMs from Omnidirectional Images
A new benchmark reveals MLLMs achieve only 13% or lower accuracy on advanced perspective-conditioned spatial tasks in omnidirectional images, with RL reward shaping raising a 7B model from 31% to 60% in controlled settings.
-
Beyond Localization: A Comprehensive Diagnosis of Perspective-Conditioned Spatial Reasoning in MLLMs from Omnidirectional Images
MLLMs display a large perception-reasoning gap on perspective-conditioned spatial reasoning tasks from omnidirectional images, with sharp accuracy drops on advanced tasks like egocentric rotation, though partial gains...
-
Egocentric Bias in Vision-Language Models
Most vision-language models fail Level-2 visual perspective taking: they report the camera's view rather than the 180°-rotated string, even though they often recognize that another agent sees differently.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.