REVIEW 1 cited by
ENTP: Encoder-only Next Token Prediction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
ENTP: Encoder-only Next Token Prediction
read the original abstract
Next-token prediction is conventionally done using decoder-only Transformers with causal attention, as this approach allows for efficient reuse of keys and values. What if we were not compute-limited, should we still use decoder-only Transformers? In this work, we introduce Encoder-only Next Token Prediction (ENTP). We explore the differences between ENTP and decoder-only Transformers in expressive power and complexity, highlighting potential advantages of ENTP in settings with unbounded compute. We introduce the $\operatorname{Count3}$ task and show, both theoretically and experimentally, that while ENTP can perform this task easily, a decoder-only Transformer cannot. Finally, we empirically demonstrate the superior performance of ENTP across representative tasks where next-token prediction based Transformers can be evaluated, including addition, in-context learning, and language modeling.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Hierarchical Domain Generalization
Over infinite domains, hierarchy-uniform domain generalization is impossible for every nontrivial hypothesis class; a length-generalization bound is a property of the length hierarchy, not a hierarchy-free guarantee.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.