REVIEW 3 cited by
3D Representation Methods: A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
3D Representation Methods: A Survey
read the original abstract
The field of 3D representation has experienced significant advancements, driven by the increasing demand for high-fidelity 3D models in various applications such as computer graphics, virtual reality, and autonomous systems. This review examines the development and current state of 3D representation methods, highlighting their research trajectories, innovations, strength and weakness. Key techniques such as Voxel Grid, Point Cloud, Mesh, Signed Distance Function (SDF), Neural Radiance Field (NeRF), 3D Gaussian Splatting, Tri-Plane, and Deep Marching Tetrahedra (DMTet) are reviewed. The review also introduces essential datasets that have been pivotal in advancing the field, highlighting their characteristics and impact on research progress. Finally, we explore potential research directions that hold promise for further expanding the capabilities and applications of 3D representation methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
DreamCAD: Scaling Multi-modal CAD Generation using Differentiable Parametric Surfaces
A point-supervised model represents 3D shapes as connected Bézier patches and generates editable CAD-style surfaces from text, images, or point clouds.
-
MorphIt: Flexible Spherical Approximation of Robot Morphology for Representation-driven Adaptation
MorphIt is a gradient-based spherical approximation framework for robot morphology that provides tunable control over accuracy-efficiency tradeoffs and outperforms baselines in speed and geometric fidelity.
-
Quantifying and Attributing Power Flexibility from GPU-Heavy Data Centers
Energy-aware scheduling yields latent GPU-data-center power flexibility via cooling shifts (~$30/MWh) and job movement/reordering ($30–$3000+/MWh), larger with perfect queue foresight.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.