Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Principled Bayesian Optimisation in Collaboration with Human Experts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.10452 v1 pith:BOIKPQRO submitted 2024-10-14 cs.LG math.OC

Principled Bayesian Optimisation in Collaboration with Human Experts

classification cs.LG math.OC
keywords expertslabelsadjustmentadviceexperthumanleveloptimisation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Bayesian optimisation for real-world problems is often performed interactively with human experts, and integrating their domain knowledge is key to accelerate the optimisation process. We consider a setup where experts provide advice on the next query point through binary accept/reject recommendations (labels). Experts' labels are often costly, requiring efficient use of their efforts, and can at the same time be unreliable, requiring careful adjustment of the degree to which any expert is trusted. We introduce the first principled approach that provides two key guarantees. (1) Handover guarantee: similar to a no-regret property, we establish a sublinear bound on the cumulative number of experts' binary labels. Initially, multiple labels per query are needed, but the number of expert labels required asymptotically converges to zero, saving both expert effort and computation time. (2) No-harm guarantee with data-driven trust level adjustment: our adaptive trust level ensures that the convergence rate will not be worse than the one without using advice, even if the advice from experts is adversarial. Unlike existing methods that employ a user-defined function that hand-tunes the trust level adjustment, our approach enables data-driven adjustments. Real-world applications empirically demonstrate that our method not only outperforms existing baselines, but also maintains robustness despite varying labelling accuracy, in tasks of battery design with human experts.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Battery-Sim-Agent: Leveraging LLM-Agent for Inverse Battery Parameter Estimation

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Battery-Sim-Agent reframes inverse battery parameter estimation as an LLM reasoning task in closed loop with a simulator and outperforms Bayesian optimization baselines on diverse benchmarks.

  2. Dynamic Priors in Bayesian Optimization for Hyperparameter Optimization

    cs.LG 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0

    DynaBO extends prior-weighted Bayesian optimization to multiple time-varying user priors, adds a rejection safeguard, and reports convergence guarantees plus benchmark gains over πBO.