Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

Optimizing Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Elasticsearch for Enhanced Question-Answering Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.14167 v1 pith:6A2MO3CP submitted 2024-10-18 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords elasticsearchquestion-answeringretrievalaccuracyansweringcapabilitiesdatasetes-rag
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This study aims to improve the accuracy and quality of large-scale language models (LLMs) in answering questions by integrating Elasticsearch into the Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) framework. The experiment uses the Stanford Question Answering Dataset (SQuAD) version 2.0 as the test dataset and compares the performance of different retrieval methods, including traditional methods based on keyword matching or semantic similarity calculation, BM25-RAG and TF-IDF- RAG, and the newly proposed ES-RAG scheme. The results show that ES-RAG not only has obvious advantages in retrieval efficiency but also performs well in key indicators such as accuracy, which is 0.51 percentage points higher than TF-IDF-RAG. In addition, Elasticsearch's powerful search capabilities and rich configuration options enable the entire question-answering system to better handle complex queries and provide more flexible and efficient responses based on the diverse needs of users. Future research directions can further explore how to optimize the interaction mechanism between Elasticsearch and LLM, such as introducing higher-level semantic understanding and context-awareness capabilities, to achieve a more intelligent and humanized question-answering experience.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. xpSHACL: Explainable SHACL Validation using Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Large Language Models

    cs.DB 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    xpSHACL combines a rule-based trace of why a SHACL constraint failed with RAG and an LLM to generate human-readable, cached explanations for RDF validation violations.

  2. Self-Supervised Learning in Deep Networks: A Pathway to Robust Few-Shot Classification

    cs.CV 2024-11 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A report claiming 95.12% few-shot accuracy on Mini-ImageNet from a self-supervised ResNet-101 pipeline, with insufficient experimental evidence.

  3. Adaptive User Interface Generation Through Reinforcement Learning: A Data-Driven Approach to Personalization and Optimization

    cs.HC 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A DQN-based reinforcement learning system is reported to reach CTR 0.78 and RR 0.83 on an unverified CLIP Interactions dataset, beating five baselines, but no reproducible evidence is provided.

  4. Advanced Risk Prediction and Stability Assessment of Banks Using Time Series Transformer Models

    q-fin.RM 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A standard Time Series Transformer is compared with five baselines on the UCI Bank Marketing dataset and reported as best for bank stability prediction, but the dataset contains no bank stability index.

  5. Leveraging Generative Adversarial Networks for Addressing Data Imbalance in Financial Market Supervision

    q-fin.CP 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A standard GAN is used to balance a financial dataset, and the paper reports small accuracy improvements over traditional sampling methods, though without sufficient experimental support.

  6. Optimizing Gesture Recognition for Seamless UI Interaction Using Convolutional Neural Networks

    cs.HC 2024-11 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A routine CNN benchmark for 14 hand gestures reports AUC 0.83 and recall 0.85 for an undescribed Ours model, with no error bars or code.

  7. Adaptive Cache Management for Complex Storage Systems Using CNN-LSTM-Based Spatiotemporal Prediction

    cs.DC 2024-11 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A CNN-LSTM model is claimed to predict storage cache demand better than six baselines, but the only numerical evidence is a single table without validation details.

Pith tools