Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Challenges in Implementing a Recommender System for Historical Research in the Humanities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.20909 v1 pith:JLTT75JP submitted 2024-10-28 cs.IR cs.DL

Florian Atzenhofer-Baumgartner , Bernhard C. Geiger , Christoph Trattner , Georg Vogeler , Dominik Kowald This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.IRcs.DL
keywords humanitiesrecommenderchallengesdigitalhistoricalimplementingresearchsystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This extended abstract describes the challenges in implementing recommender systems for digital archives in the humanities, focusing on Monasterium.net, a platform for historical legal documents. We discuss three key aspects: (i) the unique characteristics of so-called charters as items for recommendation, (ii) the complex multi-stakeholder environment, and (iii) the distinct information-seeking behavior of scholars in the humanities. By examining these factors, we aim to contribute to the development of more effective and tailored recommender systems for (digital) humanities research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 2 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. A Multistakeholder Approach to Value-Driven Co-Design of Recommender System Evaluation Metrics in Digital Archives

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A qualitative study translates stakeholder values from digital archives focus groups into a four-stage research funnel and eight proposed recommender evaluation metric directions.

Pith tools