REVIEW 2 cited by
Perception of Digital Privacy Protection: An Empirical Study using GDPR Framework
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Perception of privacy is a contested concept, which is also evolving along with the rapid proliferation and expansion of technological advancements. Information systems (IS) applications incorporate various sensing infrastructures, high-speed networks, and computing components that enable pervasive data collection about people. Any digital privacy breach within such systems can result in harmful and far-reaching impacts on individuals and societies. Accordingly, IS organisations have a legal and ethical responsibility to respect and protect individuals digital privacy rights. This study investigates people perception of digital privacy protection of government data using the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) framework. Findings suggest a dichotomy of perception in protecting people privacy rights. For example, people perceive the right to be informed as the most respected and protected in Information Technology (IT) systems. On the contrary, the right to object by granting and with-drawing consent is perceived as the least protected. Second, the study shows evidence of a social dilemma in people perception of digital privacy based on their context and culture.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
World Modeling with Probabilistic Structure Integration
A single probabilistic video model extracts optical flow, depth, and segments via counterfactual prompts, then integrates those structures as new token types to improve its own video predictions.
-
Digital Privacy Everywhere
A patent-style description of a device-privacy enforcement architecture, with qualitative prototype claims and no reproducible evaluation.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.