Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

A note on L\'evy-driven McKean-Vlasov SDEs under monotonicity

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Lévy-driven McKean-Vlasov SDEs are strongly well-posed under weak monotonicity and weak coercivity, with quantitative propagation of chaos and common-noise extensions.

desk verdict The gap-filling goal is right, but the interlacing proof of Theorem 2.1 is wrong, so the main existence/uniqueness results are unsupported as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.01070 v1 pith:EVD4WFPM submitted 2024-12-02 math.PR

Jianhai Bao , Yao Liu , Jian Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PR MSC 60G5160J2560J76
keywords McKean-VlasovSDELévyprocessweakmonotonicitycoercivitystrongwell-posednesspropagationofchaoscommonnoiseBanachfixedpointtheorem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that Lévy-driven McKean-Vlasov stochastic differential equations are strongly well-posed under weak monotonicity and weak coercivity, a setting in which the drift and small-jump coefficients may fail to be globally Lipschitz in the state variable. The main result, Theorem 1.1, gives existence and pathwise uniqueness of the solution whenever the initial law has finite $\beta$-th moment with $\beta\in[1,2]$, together with the moment estimate $E|X_t|^\beta \le C_T(1+E|X_0|^\beta)$. The paper also quantifies weak and strong propagation of chaos for the interacting particle system, with explicit Wasserstein convergence rates, and extends both well-posedness and conditional propagation of chaos to equations with common noise. The contribution fills a known gap: jump-type McKean-Vlasov SDEs under one-sided Lipschitz drift previously had strong well-posedness results only under stronger Lipschitz or growth conditions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the decoupled (distribution-frozen) SDE (3.1) combined with the Banach fixed point theorem. The classical SDE result of Section 2 handles each frozen measure path: a Picard iteration with piecewise-constant-in-time coefficients proves strong well-posedness for small jumps, and the interlacing technique superimposes big jumps at the Poisson jump times $\sigma_n$. The contraction is proved in the weighted $L^\beta$-Wasserstein metric $W_{\beta,\gamma}$; a direct Itô estimate would leave the term $|Y|^{\beta-2}W_\beta(\mu,\tilde\mu)^2$ uncontrolled near $|Y|=0$, so the proof conditions on the intervals between big jumps and applies the estimates (3.8) and (3.10) to obtain a contraction for large $\gamma$.

What would settle it

Compute the contraction constant of the map $\Phi$ under the weighted metric $W_{\beta,\gamma}$ for the explicit non-Lipschitz example in Remark 1.2(i), letting $\gamma\to\infty$. The theorem asserts the map becomes a contraction for large $\gamma$; if the constant never drops below 1, the Banach fixed-point step that carries the proof fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the one-sided Lipschitz (weak monotonicity) condition on the pair $(b,f)$, together with a global weak coercivity bound and local integrability, is sufficient for the McKean-Vlasov SDE (1.1) to have a unique strong solution, and that this solution has finite $\beta$-th moments on every finite horizon. The proof freezes the law path $\mu$ and solves the decoupled time-inhomogeneous SDE (3.1) via Picard iteration for the small-jump part and interlacing for the big-jump part; it then shows that the map $\Phi(\mu)_t = \mathcal{L}_{X^\mu_t}$ is a contraction on the complete metric space of law paths under the weighted distance $W_{\beta,\gamma}(\mu,\tilde\mu)=\sup_t e^{-\gamma t}W_\beta(\mu_t,\tilde\mu_t)$. The same framework yields the quantitative propagation-of-chaos rates of Theorem 1.3 and, after strengthening the monotonicity assumption, the common-noise well-posedness and conditional propagation of chaos in Section 4.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the global weak coercivity bound (A2), which must hold uniformly over every law in the class $P_\beta(\mathbb{R}^d)$; it is what keeps the proof's successive approximations from exploding before the fixed-point argument can run.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every equation in the class (1.1) satisfying (A1)-(A3) has a unique strong solution, so the standard obstacle for jump SDEs under one-sided Lipschitz drift — a missing reference rather than a missing result — is removed for the McKean-Vlasov case.
  • For the mean-field particle system (1.8), the empirical measure converges to the common law in $W_p$ at the rate $\varphi_{p,\beta,d}(n)$ from (1.12), and each particle path converges to an independent copy of the limit in a sup-norm moment sense, so simulation-based inference on finite particle systems has quantitative guarantees.
  • Strengthening the coercivity condition from (A2) to (1.6) upgrades the moment bound from time slices to the running supremum, $E(\sup_{0\le t\le T}|X_t|^\beta)\le C'_T(1+E|X_0|^\beta)$.
  • With common noise, the same well-posedness and a conditional version of propagation of chaos hold: conditioned on the common noise, particles become asymptotically independent and the conditional empirical measure converges with the same rate function.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One testable extension is to localize (A2) to measures with bounded $\beta$-th moment; the proof as written uses the uniform-over-$P_\beta$ form to keep the successive approximations alive, so any localization would need a new a priori bound.
  • The interlacing-based contraction estimate suggests a numerical scheme for non-globally Lipschitz coefficients: iterate the piecewise-constant-coefficient small-jump SDE and overlay big jumps, and the contraction estimate may yield a convergence rate in particle number and time step.
  • The paper's propagation-of-chaos result assumes $f$ is independent of the measure; Remark 1.4 shows that when $b\equiv 0$ this independence is forced by the monotonicity inequality, so dropping the assumption would require a different measure-monotonicity condition rather than a minor tweak.
  • Because the proof uses the $L^\beta$-Wasserstein metric and $\beta\in[1,2]$, trying $\beta<1$ with a different metric (for instance a Wasserstein-type distance with exponent below one) is a natural test of whether the uniqueness failure described in the paper is intrinsic or an artifact of the chosen topology.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies strong well-posedness and propagation of chaos for McKean-Vlasov SDEs driven by Lévy processes under weak monotonicity and weak coercivity. The main result, Theorem 1.1, claims existence and uniqueness of a strong solution to (1.1) with moment bounds, using a Banach fixed point on the law of the decoupled SDE; Theorem 1.3 gives quantitative weak and strong propagation of chaos; Section 4 extends these to common noise. The paper first proves a classical time-inhomogeneous SDE result (Theorem 2.1) via a Picard iteration for the small-jump part and an interlacing argument for big jumps.

Significance. If the results were established, they would fill a recognized gap in the literature: strong well-posedness of Lévy-driven SDEs under one-sided Lipschitz and weak coercivity conditions, and the corresponding McKean-Vlasov well-posedness under L^β-Wasserstein Lipschitz assumptions. The paper is clearly organized, self-contained, and gives explicit examples showing the scope of the assumptions. There is no circularity and no fitted parameters. However, the central proof is invalid as written, so the claimed results are not currently established.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2, Proof of Theorem 2.1] The interlacing construction is incorrect. After the first big jump at σ1, the true solution must restart the small-jump dynamics from the post-jump position X_{σ1}=X_{σ1-}+g_{σ1}(X_{σ1-},p1), but the paper sets X_t = Y_t + g_{σ1-}(Y_{σ1-},p1) for σ1<t<σ2, where Y solves (2.5) from the original initial value. The displayed representation X_t = Y_t + ∫_0^t∫_V g_s(Y_s,z)N(ds,dz) is not a solution of (2.1) for state-dependent coefficients. Concretely, under the assumptions of Theorem 2.1, take d=1, b=f=0, V={1}, ν({1})=1, g(x,z)=x, X0=1, β=1. The true solution is X_t=2^{N_t}, while the paper's formula gives 1+N_t, and these differ already after the second jump. This invalidates the existence proof of Theorem 2.1 and therefore also the applications of Theorem 2.1 in Theorem 1.1 and Section 4.
  2. [§3.1, Eqs. (3.8)-(3.10)] The contraction proof for the map Φ depends on the same invalid interlacing representation. The estimate (3.8) is stated for t∈[σ_n,σ_{n+1}) and the jump update (3.9) uses X_{σ_n}=X_{σ_n-}+g(X_{σ_n-}, μ_{σ_n}, p_n). These formulas are compatible only with a construction in which the process is restarted after every big jump; the paper does not provide such a construction, and its displayed global formula is inconsistent with it. Consequently, the inequalities (3.6)-(3.7) do not establish that the map defined in (3.3) is contractive for the actual solution process.
  3. [§4.1, Proof of Theorem 4.1] Theorem 4.1 is proved by invoking Theorem 2.1 for the SDE (4.6) with random coefficients, with the statement that Theorem 2.1 'is still available' in that setting. This extension is not proved, and the hypotheses (H1)-(H3) in Section 2 are formulated for deterministic coefficients. A justification is needed for the measurability and pathwise arguments when the frozen measure μ_t is random, especially because the comment in Remark 4.2 explicitly notes that the interlacing trick is not usable for random coefficients.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.2, Proof of Proposition 2.4] Strong existence is only sketched with the words 'more or less standard'; since Theorem 2.1 relies on it, the authors should either provide the full argument or cite a statement that exactly covers the present setting.
  2. [Theorem 1.3 and its proof] The exponent in (1.13) is written |X^{i,n}_t - X^i_t|^{p q_1}, but in the proof the supremum is taken with |Q^i_t|^{p q_1}; the notation should be made consistent and the supremum should be over s, not t.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typographical issues: 'cádlág' should be 'càdlàg', 'it’s' should be 'its', 'mean-filed' should be 'mean-field', and in Remark 1.2(ii) 'rigorous than' should probably be 'stronger than'.
  4. [Eq. (3.2)] The estimate uses ν((1+|·|^β)1_V(·)), while condition (1.2) is stated with 1∨|·|^β; the comparison should be made explicit so that the constants in (3.2) are clearly finite.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 1.1 is proved from a self-contained classical SDE well-posedness result via Banach fixed point, with no fitted parameters and no load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. Section 2 proves well-posedness of the time-inhomogeneous jump SDE (2.1) from scratch: Proposition 2.4 treats the small-jump equation (2.5) via Picard iterates (2.7), with Lemmas 2.5--2.7 deriving convergence and Cauchy-ness solely from (H1)--(H3); Theorem 2.1 then splices large jumps and obtains (2.3) by Itô's formula. Section 3 applies Theorem 2.1 to the frozen-measure decoupled SDE (3.1), defines the map Phi(mu)_t = L_{X^mu_t} in (3.3), and proves that Phi maps the complete metric space into itself and is contractive for large gamma, using exactly the stated assumptions (1.3), (1.4) and (A2). The Banach fixed point yields the law of the solution, so the McKean--Vlasov well-posedness is derived, not presupposed. No parameter is fitted and no "prediction" is a renamed input. Self-citations are not load-bearing: for instance, [27] is mentioned only as background, and uniqueness is proved inside the paper rather than imported from the authors' prior work. The correctness gaps noted by a careful reader—the interlacing formula in the proof of Theorem 2.1, X_t = Y_t + sum_i g_{sigma_i-}(Y_{sigma_i-},p_i) 1_{sigma_i <= t}, which is not the standard restarting interlacing for state-dependent g, and the unproved invocation in Section 4.1 that "Theorem 2.1 (which is still available to the SDE (2.1) with random coefficients)"—are mathematical or completeness issues, not reductions of the claimed result to its own inputs, so they do not affect the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters and no new entities. It relies on standard probabilistic assumptions (Levy process, Poisson random measure) and the stated monotonicity/coercivity conditions. The axiom ledger captures all assumptions the central claim rests on, with (A2) the one most plausibly fragile.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The noise is a Levy process with local characteristics satisfying the integrability condition (1.2): nu(|f|^2 1_U) + nu((1∨|.|^β∨|g|^β) 1_V) < ∞.
    This ensures the stochastic integrals with respect to the compensated Poisson measure and the big jump part are well-defined. Invoked in Section 1.2.
  • domain assumption (A1) Weak monotonicity and measure Lipschitz condition: 2<b(x,mu1)-b(y,mu2),x-y> + nu(|f(x,mu1,.)-f(y,mu2,.)|^2 1_U) ≤ L1(|x-y|^2 + W_beta(mu1,mu2)^2), and the growth bound on g.
    This is the main structural assumption on the coefficients. It allows b and f to be non-globally Lipschitz in x. Used throughout the proofs.
  • domain assumption (A2) Global weak coercivity: 2<x,b(x,mu)> + nu(|f(x,mu,.)|^2 1_U) ≤ L2(1+|x|^2 + mu(|.|^β)^(2/β)).
    This is the weakest assumption we identified; it is needed for moment estimates and the lifetime argument in Lemma 2.6.
  • domain assumption (A3) Local integrability of b and f on bounded sets, uniformly on finite time intervals.
    Used in the Picard iteration to justify convergence of the integrals. Invoked in Sections 2 and 3.
  • standard math The space of measure-valued paths C([0,T]; P_beta(R^d)) is complete under the weighted metric W_{beta,gamma}.
    Standard completeness of Wasserstein space, used in the Banach fixed point argument.
  • standard math Known empirical measure concentration result [14, Theorem 1] for Wasserstein distance.
    Used in the propagation of chaos proof to bound E W_p^p(mu_t, tilde_mu^n_t).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A note on L\'evy-driven McKean-Vlasov SDEs under monotonicity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EVD4WFPM

@misc{pith2026241201070,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A note on L\'evy-driven McKean-Vlasov SDEs under monotonicity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EVD4WFPM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.01070}
}
abstract

In this note, under a weak monotonicity and a weak coercivity, we address strong well-posedness of McKean-Vlasov stochastic differential equations (SDEs) driven by L\'{e}vy jump processes, where the coefficients are Lipschitz continuous (with respect to the measure variable) under the $L^\beta$-Wasserstein distance for $\beta\in[1,2].$ Moreover, the issue on the weak propagation of chaos (i.e., convergence in distribution via the convergence of the empirical measure) and the strong propagation of chaos (i.e., at the level paths by coupling) is explored simultaneously. To treat the strong well-posedness of McKean-Vlasov SDEs we are interested in, we investigate strong well-posedness of classical time-inhomogeneous SDEs with jumps under a local weak monotonicity and a global weak coercivity. Such a result is of independent interest, and, most importantly, can provide an available reference on strong well-posedness of L\'{e}vy-driven SDEs under the monotone condition, which nevertheless is missing for a long time. Based on the theory derived, along with the interlacing technique and the Banach fixed point theorem, the strong well-posedness of McKean-Vlasov SDEs driven by L\'{e}vy jump processes can be established. Additionally, as a potential extension, strong well-posedness and conditional propagation of chaos are treated for L\'{e}vy-driven McKean-Vlasov SDEs with common noise under a weak monotonicity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Ergodicity of conditional McKean-Vlasov jump diffusions

    math.PR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Conditional McKean-Vlasov jump diffusions are exponentially contractive in law, and the contraction rate improves as jump noise intensity grows.

  2. Stationary distributions of McKean-Vlasov SDEs with jumps: existence, uniqueness, and multiplicity

    math.PR 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    McKean-Vlasov SDEs with pure-jump Lévy noise are shown to have stationary distributions under Lyapunov conditions, multiple such distributions under local dissipativity, and a unique one with exponential convergence u...

  3. Exponential Ergodicity in $\W_1$ for SDEs with Distribution Dependent Noise and Partially Dissipative Drifts

    math.PR 2024-11 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A general theorem and applications show exponential ergodicity in W1 for McKean-Vlasov SDEs with distribution-dependent noise and only partially dissipative drift, from any initial distribution.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    and Pagliarani, S.: A Fourier-based Picard- iteration approach for a class of McKean-Vlasov SDEs with Lévy jumps, Stochastics, 93 (2021), 592–624

    Agarwal, A. and Pagliarani, S.: A Fourier-based Picard- iteration approach for a class of McKean-Vlasov SDEs with Lévy jumps, Stochastics, 93 (2021), 592–624. 30 JIANHAI BAO YAO LIU JIAN W ANG

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    and Wu, J.-L.: Existence of global solutions and invariant measures for stochastic differential equations driven by Poisson type no ise with non-Lipschitz coefficients, J

    Albeverio, S., Brzeźniak, Z. and Wu, J.-L.: Existence of global solutions and invariant measures for stochastic differential equations driven by Poisson type no ise with non-Lipschitz coefficients, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 371 (2010), 309–322

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    Applebaum, D.: Lévy Processes and Stochastic Calculus , 2nd edition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2011

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    and Delarue, F.: Probabilistic Theory of Mean Field Games with Applications I: Mean Field FBSDEs, Control, and Games , Springer, Cham, 2018

    Carmona, R. and Delarue, F.: Probabilistic Theory of Mean Field Games with Applications I: Mean Field FBSDEs, Control, and Games , Springer, Cham, 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    and Delarue, F.: Probabilistic Theory of Mean Field Games with Applications II: Mean Field Games with Common Noise and Master Equations , Springer, Cham, 2018

    Carmona, R. and Delarue, F.: Probabilistic Theory of Mean Field Games with Applications II: Mean Field Games with Common Noise and Master Equations , Springer, Cham, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Cavallazzi, T.: Well-posedness and propagation of chao s for Lévy-driven McKean-Vlasov SDEs under Lipschitz assumptions, arXiv:2301.08594

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    Chaintron, L. P. and Diez, A.: Propagation of chaos: a rev iew of models, methods and applications I: Models and methods, Kinet. Relat. Models , 15 (2022), 895–1015

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Chaintron, L. P. and Diez, A.: Propagation of chaos: a rev iew of models, methods and applications II: Applications, Kinet. Relat. Models , 15 (2022), 1017–1173

    work page 2022

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    and Stockinger, W.: Wellposedness , exponential ergodicity and numerical approx- imation of fully super-linear McKean-Vlasov SDEs and assoc iated particle systems, arXiv:2302.05133

    Chen, X., dos Reis, G. and Stockinger, W.: Wellposedness , exponential ergodicity and numerical approx- imation of fully super-linear McKean-Vlasov SDEs and assoc iated particle systems, arXiv:2302.05133

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    and Huang, X.: Harnack inequalities for McKe an-Vlasov SDEs driven by subordinate Brow- nian motions, J

    Deng, C.S. and Huang, X.: Harnack inequalities for McKe an-Vlasov SDEs driven by subordinate Brow- nian motions, J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 519 (2023), no. 126763

    2023

  3. [11]

    and Huang, X.: Well-posedness for McKean-Vl asov SDEs with distribution dependent stable noises, arXiv:2306.10970

    Deng, C.S. and Huang, X.: Well-posedness for McKean-Vl asov SDEs with distribution dependent stable noises, arXiv:2306.10970

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    and Huang, X.: Well-Posedness for McKean-Vl asov SDEs driven by multiplicative stable noises, arXiv:2401.11384

    Deng, C.S. and Huang, X.: Well-Posedness for McKean-Vl asov SDEs driven by multiplicative stable noises, arXiv:2401.11384

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Erny, X.: Well-posedness and propagation of chaos for M cKean-Vlasov equations with jumps and locally Lipschitz coefficients, Stoch. Proc. Appl. , 150 (2022), 192–214

    2022

  6. [14]

    and Guillin, A.: On the rate of convergence in Wasserstein distance of the empirical measure, Probab

    Fournier, N. and Guillin, A.: On the rate of convergence in Wasserstein distance of the empirical measure, Probab. Theory Related Fields , 162 (2015), 707–738

    2015

  7. [15]

    and Menozzi, S.: Well-posednes s of some non-linear stable driven SDEs, Discrete Contin

    Frikha, N., Konakov, V. and Menozzi, S.: Well-posednes s of some non-linear stable driven SDEs, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. , 41 (2021), 849–898

    2021

  8. [16]

    and Li, L.: Well-posedness and approximatio n of some one-dimensional Lévy-driven non- linear SDEs, Stoch

    Frikha, N. and Li, L.: Well-posedness and approximatio n of some one-dimensional Lévy-driven non- linear SDEs, Stoch. Proc. Appl. , 132 (2021), 76–107

    2021

  9. [17]

    and Krylov, N.V.: On stochastic equations wi th respect to semimartingales I, Stochastics, 4 (1980/81), 1–21

    Gyöngy, I. and Krylov, N.V.: On stochastic equations wi th respect to semimartingales I, Stochastics, 4 (1980/81), 1–21

    1980

  10. [18]

    and Wu, M.: Supercritical McKean-Vlaso v SDE driven by cylindrical α -stable process, arXiv:2410.18611

    Hao, Z., Ren, C. and Wu, M.: Supercritical McKean-Vlaso v SDE driven by cylindrical α -stable process, arXiv:2410.18611

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    and Liu, W.: McKean-Vlasov SDE and SPDE w ith locally monotone coefficients, Ann

    Hong, W., Hu, S. and Liu, W.: McKean-Vlasov SDE and SPDE w ith locally monotone coefficients, Ann. Appl. Probab., 34 (2024), 2136-2189

    2024

  12. [20]

    Huang X.: Path-distribution dependent SDEs with singu lar coefficients, Electron. J. Probab., 26 (2021), 1–21

    2021

  13. [21]

    and Wang F.-Y.: Distribution dependent SDEs wi th singular coefficients, Stochastic Process

    Huang X. and Wang F.-Y.: Distribution dependent SDEs wi th singular coefficients, Stochastic Process. Appl., 129 (2019), 4747–4770

    2019

  14. [22]

    Algorithms , 86 (2021), 813–831

    Huang, X., Yang, F.-F.: Distribution-dependent SDEs w ith Hölder continuous drift and α -stable noise, Numer. Algorithms , 86 (2021), 813–831

    2021

  15. [23]

    and Watanabe, S.: Stochastic Differential Equations and Diffusion Processes , 2nd edition, North-Holland, Kodansha, 1989

    Ikeda, N. and Watanabe, S.: Stochastic Differential Equations and Diffusion Processes , 2nd edition, North-Holland, Kodansha, 1989

    1989

  16. [24]

    Jean, J.: Weak and strong solutions of stochastic differ ential equations, Stochastics, 3 (1980), 171–191

    1980

  17. [25]

    Kac, M.: Foundations of Kinetic Theory , in: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Math- ematical Statistics and Probability, 1954–1955, 3, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1956, 171–197

    1954

  18. [26]

    and Stockinger, W.: W ell-posedness and tamed schemes for McKean- Vlasov equations with common noise, Ann

    Kumar, C., Neelima, Reisinger, C. and Stockinger, W.: W ell-posedness and tamed schemes for McKean- Vlasov equations with common noise, Ann. Appl. Probab. , 32 (2022), 3283–3330

    2022

  19. [27]

    and Wang, J.: Exponential ergodi city for SDEs and McKean-Vlasov processes with Lévy noise, Ann

    Liang, M., Majka, M.B. and Wang, J.: Exponential ergodi city for SDEs and McKean-Vlasov processes with Lévy noise, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. , 57 (2021), 1665–1701. WELL-POSEDNESS OF LÉVY-DRIVEN MCKEAN-VLASOV SDES 31

    2021

  20. [28]

    Majka, M.B.: A note on existence of global solutions and invariant measures for jump SDEs with locally one-sided Lipschitz drift, Probab. Math. Statist. , 40 (2020), 37–55

    2020

  21. [29]

    Mao, X.: Stochastic Differential Equations and Applications , Woodhead Publishing, 2007

    2007

  22. [30]

    and Röckner, M.: On maximal inequalities for purely discontinuous martinga les in infinite dimensions, in: Séminaire de Probabilités XL VI, Lecture Notes in Math

    Marinelli, C. and Röckner, M.: On maximal inequalities for purely discontinuous martinga les in infinite dimensions, in: Séminaire de Probabilités XL VI, Lecture Notes in Math. , vol. 2123, Cham, Springer International Publishing, 2014, 293–315

    2014

  23. [31]

    and Zangeneh, Bia n Z.: Propagation of chaos for stochastic spatially structured neuronal networks with delay driven b y jump diffusions, Ann

    Mehri, S., Scheutzow, M., Stannat, W. and Zangeneh, Bia n Z.: Propagation of chaos for stochastic spatially structured neuronal networks with delay driven b y jump diffusions, Ann. Appl. Probab. , 30 (2020), 175–207

    2020

  24. [32]

    1642, Springer, Berlin, 1996, 42–95

    Méléard, S.: Asymptotic behaviour of some interacting particle systems, McKean-Vlasov and Boltz- mann models, in: Probabilistic Models for Nonlinear Partial Differential Eq uations (Montecatini Terme, 1995), Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1642, Springer, Berlin, 1996, 42–95

    1995

  25. [33]

    and Röckner, M.: A Concise Course on Stochastic Partial Differential Equatio ns, Springer, Berlin, 2007

    Prévôt, C. and Röckner, M.: A Concise Course on Stochastic Partial Differential Equatio ns, Springer, Berlin, 2007

    2007

  26. [34]

    1464, Springer, Berlin, 1991, 165–251

    Sznitman, A.-S.: Topics in Propagation of Chaos , in: École d’Été de Probabilités de Saint-Flour XIX- 1989, Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1464, Springer, Berlin, 1991, 165–251

    1989

  27. [35]

    Tran, N.-K., Kieu, T.-T., Luong, D.-T. and Ngo, H.-L.: O n the infinite time horizon approximation for Lévy-driven McKean-Vlasov SDEs with non-globally Lips chitz continuous and super-linearly growth drift and diffusion coefficients, J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 543 (2025), no. 2, part ...

    2025

  28. [36]

    and Ren, P.: Distribution Dependent Stochastic Differential Equations , World Scientific Publishing Co

    Wang, F.-Y. and Ren, P.: Distribution Dependent Stochastic Differential Equations , World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ, 2024

    2024

  29. [37]

    and Zhao, G.: Lq(Lp)-theory of stochastic differential equations, Stochastic Process

    Xia, P., Xie, L., Zhang, X. and Zhao, G.: Lq(Lp)-theory of stochastic differential equations, Stochastic Process. Appl., 130 (2020), 5188–5211

    2020

  30. [38]

    and Zhang, X.: Ergodicity of stochastic differen tial equations with jumps and singular coeffi- cients, Ann

    Xie, L. and Zhang, X.: Ergodicity of stochastic differen tial equations with jumps and singular coeffi- cients, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. , 56 (2020), 175–229

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.