Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Federated Fine-Tuning of LLMs: Framework Comparison and Research Directions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.04436 v1 pith:OZ4QDQC2 submitted 2025-01-08 cs.LG cs.AI

Federated Fine-Tuning of LLMs: Framework Comparison and Research Directions

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords federatedfine-tuningllmscomputationalfedllmsanalysiscommunicationcomparison
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Federated learning (FL) provides a privacy-preserving solution for fine-tuning pre-trained large language models (LLMs) using distributed private datasets, enabling task-specific adaptation while preserving data privacy. However, fine-tuning the extensive parameters in LLMs is particularly challenging in resource-constrained federated scenarios due to the significant communication and computational costs. To gain a deeper understanding of how these challenges can be addressed, this article conducts a comparative analysis three advanced federated LLM (FedLLM) frameworks that integrate knowledge distillation (KD) and split learning (SL) to mitigate these issues: 1) FedLLMs, where clients upload model parameters or gradients to enable straightforward and effective fine-tuning; 2) KD-FedLLMs, which leverage KD for efficient knowledge sharing via logits; and 3) Split-FedLLMs, which split the LLMs into two parts, with one part executed on the client and the other one on the server, to balance the computational load. Each framework is evaluated based on key performance metrics, including model accuracy, communication overhead, and client-side computational load, offering insights into their effectiveness for various federated fine-tuning scenarios. Through this analysis, we identify framework-specific optimization opportunities to enhance the efficiency of FedLLMs and discuss broader research directions, highlighting open opportunities to better adapt FedLLMs for real-world applications. A use case is presented to demonstrate the performance comparison of these three frameworks under varying configurations and settings.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Communication-Aware Knowledge Distillation for Federated LLM Fine-Tuning over Wireless Networks

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0

    A federated distillation scheme combining channel-aware Top-k logit sparsification, sparsity-aware aggregation, and LoRA projection alignment cuts communication by about 50% while improving fine-tuning accuracy in a G...

  2. DP-FedLoRA: Privacy-Enhanced Federated Fine-Tuning for On-Device Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-09 reject novelty 3.0

    DP-FedLoRA clips and adds Gaussian noise to per-client LoRA matrices in federated LLM fine-tuning, claiming unbiased updates and bounded variance, but the privacy calibration and experiments have significant gaps.

  3. Large Language Models in Transportation Systems Management and Operations: From Text Reasoning to Multi-modal Decision Support

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A survey synthesizing LLM and MM-LLM uses in transportation operations, mobility services, and decision support while noting challenges like data heterogeneity and real-time needs.