Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Probing Large Language Models in Reasoning and Translating Complex Linguistic Puzzles

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.00817 v1 pith:2K55R7UK submitted 2025-02-02 cs.CL

Probing Large Language Models in Reasoning and Translating Complex Linguistic Puzzles

classification cs.CL
keywords promptinglinguisticreasoningcomplexlanguagellmspuzzlestranslation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper investigates the utilization of Large Language Models (LLMs) for solving complex linguistic puzzles, a domain requiring advanced reasoning and adept translation capabilities akin to human cognitive processes. We explore specific prompting techniques designed to enhance ability of LLMs to reason and elucidate their decision-making pathways, with a focus on Input-Output Prompting (IO), Chain-of-Thought Prompting (CoT), and Solo Performance Prompting (SPP). Utilizing datasets from the Puzzling Machine Competition and various Linguistics Olympiads, we employ a comprehensive set of metrics to assess the performance of GPT-4 0603, a prominent LLM, across these prompting methods. Our findings illuminate the potential of LLMs in linguistic reasoning and complex translation tasks, highlighting their capabilities and identifying limitations in the context of linguistic puzzles. This research contributes significantly to the broader field of Natural Language Processing (NLP) by providing insights into the optimization of LLM applications for improved reasoning and translation accuracy, thereby enriching the ongoing dialogue in NLP advancements.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Think Through a Bottleneck: Hourglass Reasoning for Rigorous Induction

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Strict stage isolation that passes only a compressed symbolic schema and rule between LLM calls improves few-shot inductive reasoning more than self-refinement or explicit verbalization alone.