pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.15897 · v5 · submitted 2025-02-21 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Electrostatics in semiconducting devices I : The Pure Electrostatics Self Consistent Approximation

A. Lacerda-Santos , Xavier Waintal This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 02:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords electrostaticssemiconductor devicesquantum capacitanceself-consistent approximationscreeningdepletionquantum Hall regime
0
0 comments X

The pith

PESCA provides a quantitative electrostatic model for charge distributions in semiconductor devices when the capacitance ratio κ is small.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces the Pure Electrostatic Self Consistent Approximation as a minimal model for incorporating semiconductors into electrostatic calculations. It accounts for screening and partial depletion effects such as those induced by field effect. The approach allows reconstruction of charge distributions from pinch-off phase diagrams in gate voltage space and extends to magnetic fields for edge reconstruction in the quantum Hall regime. Its accuracy is governed by the small parameter κ equal to the ratio of geometrical capacitance to quantum capacitance, which is typically around 1% in common situations.

Core claim

PESCA is a self-consistent electrostatic approximation that includes the semiconductor response through a quantum-capacitance screening term, allowing calculation of charge distributions inside devices. The validity of this model is controlled by the small parameter κ = C_g/C_q, which is of order 1% in many situations and thereby renders PESCA quantitative.

What carries the argument

The Pure Electrostatic Self Consistent Approximation (PESCA), which adds semiconductor screening and depletion to electrostatic calculations via a quantum-capacitance term.

If this is right

  • Reconstructs the charge distribution inside devices from measurements of pinch-off phase diagrams in gate voltage space.
  • Extends directly to include magnetic fields and calculate edge reconstruction in the quantum Hall regime.
  • Yields quantitative results for charge calculations whenever κ is of order 1% as occurs in many common device geometries.
  • Supplies a minimum model for adding semiconductors to electrostatic calculations while retaining screening and depletion.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Device modeling workflows could adopt PESCA to simplify calculations of charge profiles before adding more complex quantum corrections.
  • The same capacitance-ratio control might apply to electrostatic treatments of other confined carrier systems beyond the devices discussed.
  • Experimental mapping of κ across different gate geometries would directly test the range where PESCA remains accurate.

Load-bearing premise

The semiconductor response can be captured entirely by a quantum-capacitance screening term inside a purely electrostatic calculation without additional quantum-mechanical or disorder effects.

What would settle it

Measurements of charge distributions in devices that deviate substantially from PESCA predictions even when the measured value of κ remains small.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.15897 by A. Lacerda-Santos, Xavier Waintal.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Side view of the split quantum wire system studied in this article. Various [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Example of ILDOS. a): ILDOS obtained from a quantum calculation. b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Illustration of the PESCA algorithm. For each iteration, the upper panel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: fraction of Dirichlet cells (D) in the 2DEG as a function of the number of PESCA iterations. In green all cells belonged to D at the first iteration. In blue all cells were set to Neumann (N ) in the initial configuration. The inset on the right corner shows the D/N partitioning as a function of position x. The black regions correspond to Dirichlet cells and yellow to Neuman points. The full set of iterati… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Top panel: PESCA Pinch-off phase diagram for the split wire device [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Effect of bias cooling. Density n(xwirel) versus gate Vside = Vmiddle at xwire = −225nm as a function of Vbias. The n(V) profiles are all calculated at the low temperature stage but for different Vbias at the high temperature stage. The dif￾ferent curves correspond respectively to black for Vbias = 0V, green for Vbias = 0.3V and blue for Vbias = 0.6V [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Pinch off voltage in a single gate geometry (see inset) versus gate width. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Functions smid(x), sside(x), soff(x), ssc(x) providing the full solution of PESCA in region A of the phase diagram, see Eq.(11). The vertical red dotted lines show the positions of the electrostatic gates. between region A and D is given from n(x = xmiddle ≡ 0) = 0, which translates into Vmiddlesmid(0) + Vsidesside(0) + Voffsoff(0) + Vscssc(0) + ndop 1016 sdop(0) = 0 (12) Similarly, the frontier Wside betw… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison between PESCA Pinch-off phase diagram with the full metallic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: a) Thomas Fermi ILDOS for B = 1.4T. One can see the µ and n regions for which a site is of Ni or Di type up to i = 2. For example, if 1/2ħhωc < µ < 3/2ħhωc then the site is of N1 type with n = 1.81.1014m−2 . b) Thomas Fermi ILDOS for B = 0.2T and B = 2mT in blue and black respectively. The ILDOS in red corre￾sponds to Thomas-Fermi at B = 0T. At the energy scales relevant to the problem in question there i… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Np/Dp partitioning as a function of the iteration number for the results in Fig.12. Top panel: Up to iteration 12 the PESCA approximation was used. At the latter iteration the PESCA N /D partitioning is stable. The resulting potential and charge profile are then used as input to iteration 13. For the latter and onwards thomas-fermi approximation is used for B = 1.42T. The yellow and black regions correspo… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Top panel: Chemical potential profile at the 2DEG as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Top panel: Chemical potential profile at the 2DEG as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In quantum nanoelectronics devices, the electrostatic energy is the largest energy scale at play and, to a large extend, it determines the charge distribution inside the devices. Here, we introduce the Pure Electrostatic Self consistent Approximation (PESCA) that provides a minimum model that describes how to include a semiconductor in an electrostatic calculation to properly account for both screening and partial depletion due to e.g. field effect. We show how PESCA may be used to reconstruct the charge distribution from the measurement of pinch-off phase diagrams in the gate voltages space. PESCA can also be extended to account for magnetic field and calculate the edge reconstruction in the quantum Hall regime. The validity of PESCA is controlled by a small parameter $\kappa = C_g/C_q$, the ratio of the geometrical capacitance to the quantum capacitance, which is, in many common situations, of the order of 1%, making PESCA a quantitative technique for the calculation of the charge distribution inside devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the Pure Electrostatic Self-Consistent Approximation (PESCA) as a minimum model for incorporating semiconductor screening and partial depletion into electrostatic calculations of charge distributions in quantum nanoelectronics devices. PESCA is controlled by the small parameter κ = C_g/C_q, claimed to be ≪1 (often ~1%) in common situations, enabling quantitative use for reconstructing charge from pinch-off phase diagrams in gate-voltage space and for extensions to magnetic fields and quantum-Hall edge reconstruction.

Significance. If the central modeling step holds, PESCA supplies an explicitly controlled, low-parameter electrostatic framework whose error is bounded by a measurable capacitance ratio. This could streamline device modeling and data interpretation in regimes where electrostatics dominate, with the parameter-free character of the approximation (once κ is fixed externally) constituting a clear methodological strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract, first paragraph] The replacement of the full semiconductor response by a local quantum-capacitance term is the load-bearing modeling choice; the manuscript should supply a concrete derivation or bound showing that additional quantum-mechanical or disorder contributions remain higher-order in κ (or are negligible in the targeted regime).
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains a typographical error: 'to a large extend' should read 'to a large extent'.
  2. [Abstract] Notation for capacitances (C_g, C_q) is introduced without an explicit definition or diagram; a short schematic relating geometrical and quantum capacitances would improve clarity for readers outside the immediate subfield.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the recommendation of minor revision. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, first paragraph] The replacement of the full semiconductor response by a local quantum-capacitance term is the load-bearing modeling choice; the manuscript should supply a concrete derivation or bound showing that additional quantum-mechanical or disorder contributions remain higher-order in κ (or are negligible in the targeted regime).

    Authors: We agree that the replacement of the full semiconductor response by a local quantum-capacitance term constitutes the central modeling step of PESCA. The manuscript derives this approximation from the electrostatic energy functional under the assumption that the dominant semiconductor response is captured by the quantum capacitance C_q, yielding the small parameter κ = C_g/C_q. Deviations arising from non-local quantum-mechanical effects or disorder are argued to enter at higher order in κ because they are suppressed by the same capacitance ratio that controls the leading approximation. To make this bound explicit as requested, we will add a concise derivation (approximately one paragraph plus a short appendix) in the revised manuscript that estimates the leading correction terms as O(κ) or smaller in the regime of interest. This addition will clarify the error control without altering the main results, figures, or conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The manuscript introduces PESCA as an explicit modeling approximation that replaces the semiconductor response with a local quantum-capacitance term inside a purely electrostatic solver. Its claimed validity is controlled by the external small parameter κ = C_g/C_q, presented as a physical ratio rather than a quantity fitted or defined inside the model. No derivation step reduces a prediction to a fitted input by construction, no self-citation chain is load-bearing, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work. The central claim is therefore a controlled modeling choice whose error estimate is stated independently of the approximation itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that electrostatics dominates and that screening is fully captured by a quantum-capacitance term; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The electrostatic energy is the largest energy scale at play and to a large extent determines the charge distribution inside the devices.
    Opening sentence of the abstract; this premise justifies treating the problem as purely electrostatic.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5702 in / 1210 out tokens · 39379 ms · 2026-05-23T02:23:24.176186+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Electrostatics in semiconducting devices II: Solving the Helmholtz equation

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Maps the quantum-electrostatic self-consistency problem to a non-linear Helmholtz equation, enabling construction of a convex functional for provable convergence that lifts to the exact solution in typically one or tw...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Lacerda-Santos and X

    A. Lacerda-Santos and X. Waintal, Electrostatics in semiconducting devices ii : Solving the helmholtz equation, In preparation (2025)

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Lacerda-Santos, C

    A. Lacerda-Santos, C. Groth and X. Waintal, Electrostatics in semiconducting devices iii : The pescado open source library, In preparation (2025)

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    D. B. Chklovskii, B. I. Shklovskii and L. I. Glazman,Electrostatics of edge channels, Physical Review B 46(7), 4026 (1992), doi:10.1103 /PhysRevB.46.4026

    work page 1992

  4. [4]

    D. B. Chklovskii, K. A. Matveev and B. I. Shklovskii, Ballistic conductance of in- teracting electrons in the quantum hall regime , Phys. Rev. B 47, 12605 (1993), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.47.12605

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.47.12605 1993

  5. [5]

    D. B. Chklovskii, B. I. Shklovskii and L. I. Glazman, Erratum: Electrostatics of edge chan- nels, Phys. Rev. B 46, 15606 (1992), doi:10.1103 /PhysRevB.46.15606.3

    work page 1992

  6. [6]

    Armagnat and X

    P . Armagnat and X. Waintal, Reconciling edge states with compressible stripes in a ballistic mesoscopic conductor , Journal of Physics: Materials 3(2), 02LT01 (2020), doi:10.1088/2515-7639/ab7582

    work page doi:10.1088/2515-7639/ab7582 2020

  7. [7]

    Armagnat, A

    P . Armagnat, A. Lacerda-Santos, B. Rossignol, C. Groth and X. Waintal,The self-consistent quantum-electrostatic problem in strongly non-linear regime, SciPost Phys. 7, 031 (2019), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.7.3.031

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.7.3.031 2019

  8. [8]

    Chatzikyriakou, J

    E. Chatzikyriakou, J. Wang, L. Mazzella, A. Lacerda-Santos, M. C. d. S. Figueira, A. Trel- lakis, S. Birner, T . Grange, C. Bäuerle and X. Waintal,Unveiling the charge distribution of a gaas-based nanoelectronic device: A large experimental dataset approach, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043163 (2022), doi:10.1103 /PhysRevResearch.4.043163

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Edlbauer, J

    H. Edlbauer, J. Wang, T . Crozes, P . Perrier, S. Ouacel, C. Geffroy , G. Georgiou, E. Chatzikyr- iakou, A. Lacerda-Santos, X. Waintal, D. C. Glattli, P . Roulleauet al., Semiconductor-based electron flying qubits: review on recent progress accelerated by numerical modelling , EPJ Quantum Technology 9(1), 21 (2022), doi:10.1140 /epjqt/s40507-022-00139-w

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Roussely , E

    G. Roussely , E. Arrighi, G. Georgiou, S. Takada, M. Schalk, M. Urdampilleta, A. Ludwig, A. D. Wieck, P . Armagnat, T . Kloss, X. Waintal, T . Meunieret al., Unveiling the bosonic nature of an ultrashort few-electron pulse , Nature Communications 9(1), 2811 (2018), doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05203-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05203-7 2018

  11. [11]

    B. D. Woods, T . D. Stanescu and S. Das Sarma,Effective theory approach to the schrödinger- poisson problem in semiconductor majorana devices , Phys. Rev. B 98, 035428 (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.035428

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.035428 2018

  12. [12]

    B. D. Woods, S. Das Sarma and T . D. Stanescu, Charge-impurity ef- fects in hybrid majorana nanowires , Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 054053 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.054053

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.16.054053 2021

  13. [13]

    S. Ahn, H. Pan, B. Woods, T . D. Stanescu and S. Das Sarma, Estimating disorder and its adverse effects in semiconductor majorana nanowires, Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 124602 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.124602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.5.124602 2021

  14. [14]

    J. Wang, E. Polizzi and M. Lundstrom, A three-dimensional quantum simulation of silicon nanowire transistors with the effective-mass approximation , Journal of Applied Physics 96(4), 2192 (2004), doi:10.1063 /1.1769089. 22 SciPost Physics Submission

    work page 2004

  15. [15]

    Marconcini, A

    P . Marconcini, A. Cresti, F . Triozon, G. Fiori, B. Biel, Y.-M. Niquet, M. Macucci and S. Roche, Atomistic boron-doped graphene field-effect transistors: A route toward unipo- lar characteristics , ACS Nano 6(9), 7942 (2012), doi:10.1021 /nn3024046, PMID: 22876866

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    J. D. T . Luna, S. R. Kuppuswamy and A. R. Akhmerov,Design of a Majorana trijunction, SciPost Phys. 16, 044 (2024), doi:10.21468 /SciPostPhys.16.2.044

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    S. R. Kuppuswamy , H. Kerstens, C.-X. Liu, L. Wang and A. Akhmerov,Impact of disorder on the distribution of gate coupling strengths in a spin qubit device , arXiv:2208.02190 (2022), doi:10.48550 /arXiv.2208.02190

    work page arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    S. D. Escribano, E. Prada, Y. Oreg and A. L. Yeyati,Tunable proximity effects and topological superconductivity in ferromagnetic hybrid nanowires, Phys. Rev. B 104, L041404 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.104.L041404

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.l041404 2021

  19. [19]

    Karzig, C

    T . Karzig, C. Knapp, R. M. Lutchyn, P . Bonderson, M. B. Hastings, C. Nayak, J. Alicea, K. Flensberg, S. Plugge, Y. Oreg, C. M. Marcus and M. H. Freedman, Scalable designs for quasiparticle-poisoning-protected topological quantum computation with majorana zero modes, Phys. Rev. B 95, 235305 (2017), doi:10.1103 /PhysRevB.95.235305

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    B. D. Woods and T . D. Stanescu, Electrostatic effects and topological superconductivity in semiconductor–superconductor–magnetic-insulator hybrid wires, Phys. Rev. B104, 195433 (2021), doi:10.1103 /PhysRevB.104.195433

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    C.-X. Liu, S. Schuwalow, Y. Liu, K. Vilkelis, A. L. R. Manesco, P . Krogstrup and M. Wimmer, Electronic properties of inas/eus/al hybrid nanowires, Phys. Rev. B 104, 014516 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.104.014516

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.014516 2021

  22. [22]

    H. Gummel, A self-consistent iterative scheme for one-dimensional steady state transistor calculations, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices11(10), 455 (1964), doi:10.1109/T- ED.1964.15364

    work page doi:10.1109/t- 1964

  23. [23]

    I. Tan, G. L. Snider, L. D. Chang and E. L. Hu, A self-consistent solution of Schrödinger–Poisson equations using a nonuniform mesh , Journal of Applied Physics 68(8), 4071 (1990), doi:10.1063 /1.346245

    work page 1990

  24. [24]

    V . Gudmundsson,Oscillating impurity spectra caused by non-linear screening in the quan- tum hall regime , Solid State Communications 74(2), 63 (1990), doi:10.1016 /0038- 1098(90)90606-C

    work page 1990

  25. [25]

    L. Wang, D. Wang and P . M. Asbeck,A numerical schrödinger–poisson solver for radially symmetric nanowire core–shell structures, Solid-State Electronics 50(11), 1732 (2006), doi:10.1016/j.sse.2006.09.013

    work page doi:10.1016/j.sse.2006.09.013 2006

  26. [26]

    F . Rana, S. Tiwari and D. A. Buchanan,Self-consistent modeling of accumulation layers and tunneling currents through very thin oxides, Applied Physics Letters 69(8), 1104 (1996), doi:10.1063/1.117072

    work page doi:10.1063/1.117072 1996

  27. [27]

    F . Stern, Iteration methods for calculating self-consistent fields in semiconductor inver- sion layers , Journal of Computational Physics 6(1), 56 (1970), doi:10.1016 /0021- 9991(70)90004-5

    work page 1970

  28. [28]

    Trellakis, A

    A. Trellakis, A. T . Galick, A. Pacelli and U. Ravaioli,Iteration scheme for the solution of the two-dimensional Schrödinger-Poisson equations in quantum structures, Journal of Applied Physics 81(12), 7880 (1997), doi:10.1063 /1.365396. 23 SciPost Physics Submission

    work page 1997

  29. [29]

    Journal of Computational Physics , author =

    V . Eyert, A comparative study on methods for convergence acceleration of iter- ative vector sequences , Journal of Computational Physics 124(2), 271 (1996), doi:10.1006/jcph.1996.0059

    work page doi:10.1006/jcph.1996.0059 1996

  30. [30]

    A. Vuik, D. Eeltink, A. R. Akhmerov and M. Wimmer, Effects of the electrostatic environ- ment on the majorana nanowire devices, New Journal of Physics 18(3), 033013 (2016), doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/3/033013

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/3/033013 2016

  31. [31]

    D. G. Anderson, Iterative procedures for nonlinear integral equations , J. ACM 12(4), 547–560 (1965), doi:10.1145/321296.321305

    work page doi:10.1145/321296.321305 1965

  32. [32]

    A. E. Antipov, A. Bargerbos, G. W . Winkler, B. Bauer, E. Rossi and R. M. Lutchyn,Effects of gate-induced electric fields on semiconductor majorana nanowires, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031041 (2018), doi:10.1103 /PhysRevX.8.031041

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    S. D. Escribano, A. Levy Yeyati, Y. Oreg and E. Prada, Effects of the electrostatic en- vironment on superlattice majorana nanowires , Phys. Rev. B 100, 045301 (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.100.045301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.045301 2019

  34. [34]

    Pulay ,Convergence acceleration of iterative sequences

    P . Pulay ,Convergence acceleration of iterative sequences. the case of scf iteration, Chemical Physics Letters 73(2), 393 (1980), doi:10.1016 /0009-2614(80)80396-4

    work page 1980

  35. [35]

    C. G. Broyden, A class of methods for solving nonlinear simultaneous equations , Math. Comp. 19, 577 (1965), doi:10.1090 /S0025-5718-1965-0198670-6

    work page 1965

  36. [36]

    Andrei and I

    P . Andrei and I. Mayergoyz, Analysis of fluctuations in semiconductor devices through self-consistent Poisson-Schrödinger computations, Journal of Applied Physics 96(4), 2071 (2004), doi:10.1063 /1.1772886

    work page 2071

  37. [37]

    R. Lake, G. Klimeck, R. C. Bowen, D. Jovanovic, D. Blanks and M. Swaminathan, Quan- tum transport with band-structure and schottky contacts, physica status solidi (b) 204(1), 354 (1997), doi:10.1002 /1521-3951(199711)204:1<354::AID-PSSB354>3.0.CO;2-

    work page 1997

  38. [38]

    A. Pacelli, Self-consistent solution of the schrodinger equation in semiconductor de- vices by implicit iteration , IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 44(7), 1169 (1997), doi:10.1109/16.595946

    work page doi:10.1109/16.595946 1997

  39. [39]

    Kumar, S

    A. Kumar, S. E. Laux and F . Stern, Electron states in a gaas quantum dot in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 42, 5166 (1990), doi:10.1103 /PhysRevB.42.5166

    work page 1990

  40. [40]

    Journal of Computational Physics , author =

    D. Knoll and D. Keyes, Jacobian-free newton–krylov methods: a survey of ap- proaches and applications , Journal of Computational Physics 193(2), 357 (2004), doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2003.08.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2003.08.010 2004

  41. [41]

    A. E. G. Mikkelsen, P . Kotetes, P . Krogstrup and K. Flensberg, Hybridiza- tion at superconductor-semiconductor interfaces , Phys. Rev. X 8, 031040 (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031040

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.031040 2018

  42. [42]

    Trellakis and U

    A. Trellakis and U. Ravaioli, Lateral scalability limits of silicon conduction channels, Jour- nal of Applied Physics 86(7), 3911 (1999), doi:10.1063 /1.371307

    work page 1999

  43. [43]

    Curatola and G

    G. Curatola and G. Iannaccone, Nanotcad2d: Two-dimensional code for the simulation of nanoelectronic devices and structures , Computational Materials Science 28(2), 342 (2003), doi:10.1016 /S0927-0256(03)00117-4. 24 SciPost Physics Submission

    work page 2003

  44. [44]

    Z. Ren, R. Venugopal, S. Goasguen, S. Datta and M. Lundstrom, nanomos 2.5: A two- dimensional simulator for quantum transport in double-gate mosfets , IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 50(9), 1914 (2003), doi:10.1109 /TED.2003.816524

    work page arXiv 1914

  45. [45]

    Bautze, C

    T . Bautze, C. Süssmeier, S. Takada, C. Groth, T . Meunier, M. Yamamoto, S. Tarucha, X. Waintal and C. Bäuerle, Theoretical, numerical, and experimental study of a flying qubit electronic interferometer , Phys. Rev. B 89, 125432 (2014), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.89.125432

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.89.125432 2014

  46. [46]

    Bäuerle, D

    C. Bäuerle, D. Christian Glattli, T . Meunier, F . Portier, P . Roche, P . Roulleau, S. Takada and X. Waintal, Coherent control of single electrons: a review of current progress , Reports on Progress in Physics 81(5), 056503 (2018), doi:10.1088 /1361-6633/aaa98a

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    Bäuerle, F .Pierre and P .Roche, Private communications

    C. .Bäuerle, F .Pierre and P .Roche, Private communications . 25

    work page