REVIEW 3 cited by
Instruction-Tuning LLMs for Event Extraction with Annotation Guidelines
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Instruction-Tuning LLMs for Event Extraction with Annotation Guidelines
read the original abstract
In this work, we study the effect of annotation guidelines -- textual descriptions of event types and arguments, when instruction-tuning large language models for event extraction. We conducted a series of experiments with both human-provided and machine-generated guidelines in both full- and low-data settings. Our results demonstrate the promise of annotation guidelines when there is a decent amount of training data and highlight its effectiveness in improving cross-schema generalization and low-frequency event-type performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
ChunkLLM: A Lightweight Pluggable Framework for Accelerating LLMs Inference
ChunkLLM adds lightweight chunk-boundary and chunk-attention adapters to frozen LLMs, keeping ~98% of long-context quality with ~49% KV cache and up to 4.48x speedup on 120K-token generation.
-
Task Decomposition for Efficient Annotation
Decomposing annotation tasks using centers from centering theory reduces aggregate inferential load via a degrees-of-freedom model and enables better sub-task allocation.
-
Refining and Reusing Annotation Guidelines for LLM Annotation
An iterative moderation framework refines and reuses annotation guidelines to improve LLM annotation accuracy on biomedical NER tasks across GPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek models.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.