Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bringing Comparative Cognition To Computers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.02882 v1 pith:SCRXT3UV submitted 2025-03-04 cs.AI

Bringing Comparative Cognition To Computers

classification cs.AI
keywords cognitioncognitivecomparativeanimalsapproachartificialavoidbringing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Researchers are increasingly subjecting artificial intelligence systems to psychological testing. But to rigorously compare their cognitive capacities with humans and other animals, we must avoid both over- and under-stating our similarities and differences. By embracing a comparative approach, we can integrate AI cognition research into the broader cognitive sciences.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Personality, Role, and Expressive Style in Large Language Models: An Interactionist Analysis

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Expressed personality in LLM dialogues is shaped by trait prompts, roles, and styles in trait-specific ways, with similar patterns in English and Japanese.