pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.13061 · v3 · submitted 2025-03-17 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc· hep-ph· quant-ph

Decoherence from quantum spacetime noise: An open-systems framework with application to neutrino oscillations

Partha Nandi , Tiasha Bhattacharyya , A. S. Majumdar , Graeme Pleasance , Francesco Petruccione This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 23:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qchep-phquant-ph
keywords decoherencequantum spacetimeneutrino oscillationsLindblad master equationkappa-Minkowskiopen quantum systemsspacetime fluctuations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Treating the kappa-Minkowski deformation parameter as Gaussian white noise produces a Lindblad master equation whose decoherence rate scales as the inverse fourth power of energy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds an open-quantum-systems description of decoherence caused by stochastic Planck-scale spacetime fluctuations, using kappa-Minkowski noncommutative geometry as the example. Modeling the deformation parameter itself as Gaussian white noise yields a general Lindblad-type master equation that governs the evolution of any quantum system. Applied to a three-level system representing neutrino flavor oscillations, the equation produces explicit survival and transition probabilities containing damping factors whose strength falls as E to the minus four. This inverse scaling implies that spacetime-induced decoherence is negligible for the high-energy neutrinos observed by IceCube yet becomes potentially relevant for the sub-eV energies of the cosmic neutrino background.

Core claim

Promoting the deformation parameter of kappa-Minkowski geometry to a Gaussian white-noise process directly determines the Lindblad operators and produces a master equation whose decoherence rate satisfies Gamma proportional to E^{-4}; the resulting damped oscillation probabilities for neutrinos therefore exhibit strongest suppression at the lowest energies.

What carries the argument

The Lindblad master equation obtained by treating the kappa-Minkowski deformation parameter as Gaussian white noise, which supplies both the form of the decoherence operators and the distinctive E^{-4} energy dependence.

If this is right

  • The derived master equation applies to any quantum system, not only neutrinos.
  • Neutrino survival and transition probabilities acquire explicit exponential damping factors whose magnitude decreases with increasing energy.
  • High-energy neutrino data remain essentially unaffected while low-energy regimes become the natural arena for detectable effects.
  • The E^{-4} scaling stands in contrast to quantum-gravity models that predict decoherence rates increasing with energy.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Precision experiments targeting the cosmic neutrino background could serve as a practical test bed for the framework.
  • The same noise-modeling technique might be adapted to other noncommutative geometries or to quantum-information protocols sensitive to Planck-scale fluctuations.
  • Low-energy rather than high-energy regimes emerge as the more promising window for Planck-scale signatures under this class of models.

Load-bearing premise

The deformation parameter of kappa-Minkowski geometry can be promoted to a stochastic Gaussian white-noise process whose statistics fix the Lindblad operators.

What would settle it

Measurement of the energy dependence of damping in oscillation probabilities for neutrinos at sub-eV energies, or the absence of such damping, would directly test the predicted inverse-fourth-power scaling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2503.13061 by A. S. Majumdar, Francesco Petruccione, Graeme Pleasance, Partha Nandi, Tiasha Bhattacharyya.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Coherence length l ij ch as a function of the parameter χ at E = 10−6 eV. The three curves correspond to the three independent neutrino mass-squared differences: l 21 ch (blue), l 31 ch (red), and l 32 ch (green). Throughout the text, we use lch to denote the coherence length generically and l ij ch when referring to a specific mass-eigenstate pair (i, j). as an order-of-magnitude consistency check. More p… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Standard CνB neutrino survival probability for νe → νe (60) plotted as a function of Energy E (measured in eV) for a fixed χ = 1062 and path length L ∼ 1014 km. on Tr(Peρf ), i.e. on the flavour-projected density ma￾trix rather than on the presence of flavour oscillations themselves. This distinction is well established in the CνB capture literature and implies that decoherence ef￾fects may still influence… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Decoherence effect on standard survival and tran [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Standard CνB neutrino transition probability for νe → νµ (60) plotted as a function of Energy E (measured in eV) for a fixed χ = 1062 and path length L ∼ 1014 km. tions is interpreted as an averaged effect, emerging from the cumulative interaction with spacetime variations. For low-energy particles, these stochastic fluctuations induce small, localized disturbances in the quantum state. Al￾though each indi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a general open-quantum-systems framework to model decoherence induced by stochastic Planck-scale fluctuations of spacetime, focusing on the kappa-Minkowski noncommutative geometry as a representative quantum-gravity scenario. Treating the deformation parameter as Gaussian white noise, we derive a Lindblad-type master equation applicable to arbitrary quantum systems and obtain a distinctive inverse-energy scaling of the decoherence rate, Gamma proportional to E^{-4}. As an illustrative example, we analyze a three-level system motivated by neutrino flavor oscillations and derive closed-form expressions for survival and transition probabilities with spacetime-induced damping. The E^{-4} scaling contrasts sharply with the positive power laws often invoked in quantum-gravity phenomenology and predicts negligible decoherence for high-energy neutrinos consistent with IceCube observations, while implying that the strongest effects arise in the extreme low-energy regime. In this context, the sub-eV-scale energies characteristic of the cosmic neutrino background provide a natural infrared benchmark for illustrating the enhanced sensitivity to quantum-spacetime fluctuations. Our results establish a unified formalism connecting quantum-information methods, open-system dynamics, and quantum-spacetime phenomenology, thereby offering a framework for exploring potential signatures of Planck-scale physics in future low-energy neutrino studies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops an open-quantum-systems framework for decoherence induced by stochastic Planck-scale fluctuations of spacetime, using kappa-Minkowski noncommutative geometry as an example. Treating the deformation parameter as Gaussian white noise, the authors derive a Lindblad-type master equation for arbitrary quantum systems and obtain a decoherence rate scaling as Gamma proportional to E^{-4}. They apply the framework to a three-level system modeling neutrino flavor oscillations, deriving closed-form survival and transition probabilities that include spacetime-induced damping, and discuss implications for low-energy regimes such as the cosmic neutrino background while noting consistency with high-energy IceCube observations.

Significance. If the derivation holds, the work supplies a unified formalism linking quantum-information methods, open-system dynamics, and quantum-gravity phenomenology. The distinctive E^{-4} scaling contrasts with many other quantum-gravity decoherence models and yields falsifiable predictions: negligible effects at high energies (aligning with existing data) but enhanced sensitivity at sub-eV scales. The closed-form probabilities facilitate direct phenomenological comparison, and the framework offers a concrete route for exploring Planck-scale signatures in future low-energy neutrino experiments.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and the open-systems framework section] The modeling step that promotes the kappa-Minkowski deformation parameter to a Gaussian white-noise process (abstract and the section deriving the master equation) is introduced without derivation from the underlying commutation relations [x^0, x^i] = i a x^i or from any UV completion. This assumption directly supplies the noise correlator that defines the Lindblad operators and produces the reported E^{-4} scaling; any deviation from white-noise statistics would change both the dissipator and the power law. This assumption is load-bearing for the central claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract states that closed-form expressions for survival and transition probabilities are derived, but explicit equation or section references would improve navigation and allow readers to verify the damping terms without searching the full text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive evaluation of its potential significance. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and the open-systems framework section] The modeling step that promotes the kappa-Minkowski deformation parameter to a Gaussian white-noise process (abstract and the section deriving the master equation) is introduced without derivation from the underlying commutation relations [x^0, x^i] = i a x^i or from any UV completion. This assumption directly supplies the noise correlator that defines the Lindblad operators and produces the reported E^{-4} scaling; any deviation from white-noise statistics would change both the dissipator and the power law. This assumption is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the identification of the deformation parameter with Gaussian white noise is a phenomenological modeling assumption rather than a direct consequence of the kappa-Minkowski commutation relations or any specific UV completion. The commutation relations fix the algebraic structure of noncommutativity but leave the stochastic dynamics of the deformation parameter unspecified; white-noise statistics are adopted to obtain a Markovian Lindblad equation in the standard open-systems manner. This choice produces the reported E^{-4} scaling as a direct consequence. We will revise the manuscript to state this assumption more explicitly in the abstract and framework section, to motivate it via the Markovian approximation appropriate for rapid Planck-scale fluctuations, and to note that other noise correlators would yield different dissipators and scalings. No derivation from first principles is claimed or possible within the present scope. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation follows explicitly from stated modeling assumption.

full rationale

The paper states its central modeling step as treating the kappa-Minkowski deformation parameter as Gaussian white noise, from which the Lindblad master equation and Gamma ~ E^{-4} scaling are derived. This is presented as an explicit assumption in the abstract and framework section, not as a result obtained by fitting parameters to data, self-definition of quantities, or reduction via self-citation chains. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to prior results from the same authors; the scaling is a direct consequence of the white-noise correlator combined with the energy dependence in the Hamiltonian, making the derivation self-contained as an open-systems model without circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on promoting the kappa deformation parameter to a stochastic process and on the standard Lindblad form for Markovian open-system evolution; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • noise variance of deformation parameter
    The amplitude of the Gaussian white noise is a free parameter that sets the overall decoherence strength.
axioms (2)
  • ad hoc to paper The kappa-Minkowski deformation parameter can be treated as Gaussian white noise
    This modeling step is invoked to obtain the Lindblad master equation from the stochastic spacetime fluctuations.
  • standard math The resulting dynamics admit a Lindblad master equation
    Standard result for Markovian open quantum systems under white-noise driving.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5767 in / 1344 out tokens · 29985 ms · 2026-05-22T23:51:41.891527+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Directly computing Wigner functions for open quantum systems

    quant-ph 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    An expression is derived to compute time-dependent Wigner functions directly from initial values in open quantum systems of a non-relativistic particle with a general environment.

  2. Spin-Induced Non-Markovian Time-Crystal-Like Dynamics and Fractal Scaling in the Bateman Dual Oscillator

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Spin-induced deformation in the Bateman dual oscillator framework yields non-Markovian reduced dynamics with persistent oscillations and fractal scaling that mimic time crystals in a globally unitary quantum system.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

113 extracted references · 113 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    and MINOS [32]. Neutrinos, with their unique quan- tum properties and ability to oscillate between different flavors over long distances, offer a promising pathway for probing otherwise inaccessible aspects of spacetime. Due to their weak interaction with matter, neutrinos serve as ideal probes for exploring the fundamental nature of spacetime across vast...

    work page

  2. [2]

    H. D. Zeh, On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory, Found. Phys.1, 69 (1970)

    work page 1970

  3. [3]

    W. H. Zurek, Decoherence, einselection, and the quan- tum origins of the classical, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 715 (2003)

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    Anastopoulos, Frequently asked questions about de- coherence, Int

    C. Anastopoulos, Frequently asked questions about de- coherence, Int. J. Theor. Phys.41, 1573 (2002)

    work page 2002

  5. [5]

    Hornberger, Introduction to Decoherence Theory, Lect

    K. Hornberger, Introduction to Decoherence Theory, Lect. Notes Phys.768, 221 (2009)

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    Penrose, On gravity’s role in quantum state reduc- tion, Gen

    R. Penrose, On gravity’s role in quantum state reduc- tion, Gen. Relativ. Gravit.28, 581 (1996)

    work page 1996

  7. [7]

    Schlosshauer, Decoherence, the measurement prob- lem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics, Rev

    M. Schlosshauer, Decoherence, the measurement prob- lem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 1267 (2004)

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    Ghosh, A

    B. Ghosh, A. S. Majumdar, and N. Nayak, Environment assisted entanglement enhancement, Phys. Rev. A74, 052315 (2006)

    work page 2006

  9. [9]

    T. Guha, B. Bhattacharya, D. Das, S. S. Bhattacharya, A. Mukherjee, A. Roy, K. Mukherjee, N. Ganguly, and A. S. Majumdar, Environmental effects on nonlocal cor- relations, Quanta8, 57 (2019)

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Chatterjee and A

    R. Chatterjee and A. S. Majumdar, Bell-inequality vi- olation by dynamical Casimir photons in a supercon- ducting microwave circuit, Phys. Rev. A106, 042224 (2022)

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    I. J. Allali and M. P. Hertzberg, Decoherence from gen- eral relativity, Phys. Rev. D103, 104053 (2021)

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Nandi and F.G

    P. Nandi and F.G. Scholtz, The hidden Lorentz covari- ance of quantum mechanics, Ann. Phys.464, 169643 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Quantum Ge- ometric Phases as a New Window on Gravitational Waves,

    Partha Nandi and Frederik G. Scholtz, “Quantum Ge- ometric Phases as a New Window on Gravitational Waves,” arXiv:2508.05881 [hep-th], 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Leggett, Testing the limits of quantum mechanics: motivation, state of play, prospects, J

    A. Leggett, Testing the limits of quantum mechanics: motivation, state of play, prospects, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter14R415 (2002)

    work page 2002

  15. [15]

    I. B. Pittaway and F. G. Scholtz, Quantum interfer- ence on the non-commutative plane and the quantum- to-classical transition, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.56, 165303 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Trinchero and F

    D. Trinchero and F. G Scholtz, Pinhole interference in three-dimensional fuzzy space, Ann. Phys.450, 169224 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Nandi, N

    P. Nandi, N. Debnath, S. Kala, and A. S. Majum- dar, Magnetically induced Schr¨ odinger cat states: The shadow of a quantum space, Phys. Rev. A110, 032204 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Bhattacharya and N

    S. Bhattacharya and N. Joshi, Decoherence and en- tropy generation at one loop in the inflationary de Sitter spacetime for Yukawa interaction, JCAP04, 078 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Petruzziello and F

    L. Petruzziello and F. Illuminati, Quantum gravita- tional decoherence from fluctuating minimal length and deformation parameter at the Planck scale, Nat. Com- mun.12, 4449 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Michele Arzano and Folkert Kuipers, Stochastic ori- gin of spacetime noncommutativity, Phys. Rev. D111, 025010 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    C. A. Mead, Possible connection between gravitation and fundamental length, Phys. Rev.135, B849 (1964)

    work page 1964

  22. [22]

    Amelino-Camelia, Quantum spacetime phenomenol- ogy, Living Rev

    G. Amelino-Camelia, Quantum spacetime phenomenol- ogy, Living Rev. Relativ.16, 5 (2013)

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    The quantum structure of spacetime at the Planck scale and quantum fields

    S. Doplicher, K. Fredenhagen, and J. E. Roberts, The quantum structure of space-time at the Planck scale and quantum fields, Commun. Math. Phys.172, 187 (1995), 13 arXiv:hep-th/0303037

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  24. [24]

    S. W. Hawking, The unpredictability of quantum grav- ity, Commun. Math. Phys.87, 395 (1982)

    work page 1982

  25. [25]

    J. A. Wheeler, Geons, Phys. Rev.97, 511 (1955)

    work page 1955

  26. [26]

    Perivolaropoulos, Cosmological horizons, uncertainty principle, and maximum length quantum mechanics, Phys

    L. Perivolaropoulos, Cosmological horizons, uncertainty principle, and maximum length quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. D95, 103523 (2017)

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    F. K. Anagnostopoulos, G. Kofinas, and V. Zarikas, ”IR quantum gravity solves naturally cosmic acceler- ation and its coincidence problem”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28, 1944013 (2019)

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo Col- laboration), Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Nandi and B

    P. Nandi and B. R. Majhi, Unveiling gravity’s quantum fingerprint through gravitational waves, Phys. Lett. B 857, 138988 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Nandi, B

    P. Nandi, B. R. Majhi, N. Debnath, and S. Kala, Quan- tum ballet by gravitational waves: Generating entangle- ment’s dance of revival-collapse and memory within the quantum system, Phys. Lett. B,853, 138706 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Herceget al., Gravitational probe of quantum space- time, Phys

    N. Herceget al., Gravitational probe of quantum space- time, Phys. Lett. B854, 138716 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Adam and N

    T. Adam and N. Agafonovaet al.(The OPERA collabo- ration), Measurement of the neutrino velocity with the OPERA detector in the CNGS beam, J. High Energ. Phys.2012, 93 (2012)

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    Adamsonet al.(MINOS Collaboration), Measure- ment of neutrino velocity with the MINOS detectors and NuMI neutrino beam, Phys

    P. Adamsonet al.(MINOS Collaboration), Measure- ment of neutrino velocity with the MINOS detectors and NuMI neutrino beam, Phys. Rev. D76, 072005 (2007)

    work page 2007

  34. [34]

    Ghose, R

    I. Ghose, R. Barick, and A. Lahiri, inProceedings of the XXV DAE-BRNS High Energy Physics (HEP) Sympo- sium, 2022, Springer Proceedings in Physics 304 (Mo- hali, India, 2022), p. 977

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    E. Lisi, A. Marrone and D. Montanino, Probing possible decoherence effects in atmospheric neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 1166 (2000)

    work page 2000

  36. [36]

    W. L. Ribeiro and C. A. Moura, Collisional approach for open neutrino systems, arXiv:2411.08330

    work page arXiv

  37. [37]

    D’Esposito and G

    V. D’Esposito and G. Gubitosi, Constraints on quan- tum spacetime-induced decoherence from neutrino os- cillations, Phys. Rev. D110, 026004 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Burrage, Clare, and Christian Kading, Fock state probability changes in open quantum systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.07673 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    M. D. C. Torri and L. Miramonti, Neutrinos as possible probes for quantum gravity, Class. Quantum Grav.41, 153001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Understanding gravitationally induced decoherence parameters in neu- trino oscillations using a microscopic quantum mechan- ical model,

    A. Domi, T. Eberl, M. J. Fahn, K. Giesel, L. Hennig, U. Katz, R. Kemper, and M. Kobler, “Understanding gravitationally induced decoherence parameters in neu- trino oscillations using a microscopic quantum mechan- ical model,” JCAP11(2024) 006, doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2024/11/006, arXiv:2403.03106 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475- 2024

  41. [41]

    Abbasiet al.(The IceCube Collaboration), Detection of astrophysical tau neutrino candidates in IceCube, Eur

    R. Abbasiet al.(The IceCube Collaboration), Detection of astrophysical tau neutrino candidates in IceCube, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 1031 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Abbasiet al.(The IceCube Collaboration), Search for quantum gravity using astrophysical neutrino flavour with IceCube, Nat

    R. Abbasiet al.(The IceCube Collaboration), Search for quantum gravity using astrophysical neutrino flavour with IceCube, Nat. Phys.18, 1287 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Abbasiet al.(The IceCube Collaboration), Search- ing for decoherence from quantum gravity at the Ice- Cube south pole neutrino observatory, Nat

    R. Abbasiet al.(The IceCube Collaboration), Search- ing for decoherence from quantum gravity at the Ice- Cube south pole neutrino observatory, Nat. Phys.20, 913 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    de Gouvˆ ea, V

    A. de Gouvˆ ea, V. De Romeri, and C. A. Ternes, Probing neutrino quantum decoherence at reactor experiments, J. High Energ. Phys.2020, 18 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Stuttard, Neutrino signals of lightcone fluctuations resulting from fluctuating spacetime, Phys

    T. Stuttard, Neutrino signals of lightcone fluctuations resulting from fluctuating spacetime, Phys. Rev. D104, 056007 (2021)

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Farzan and T

    Y. Farzan and T. Schwetz, A decoherence explanation of the gallium neutrino anomaly, arXiv:2306.09422

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    Sch¨ ucher, Forces from Connes Geometry, arXiv:0111236 [hep-th]

    T. Sch¨ ucher, Forces from Connes Geometry, arXiv:0111236 [hep-th]

    work page

  48. [48]

    A. H. Chamseddine and A. Connes, Conceptual Ex- planation for the Algebra in the Noncommutative Ap- proach to the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 191601 (2007)

    work page 2007

  49. [49]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, 2002)

    work page 2002

  50. [50]

    Gorini, A

    V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems, J. Math. Phys.17, 821 (1976)

    work page 1976

  51. [51]

    Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun

    G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun. Math. Phys.48, 119 (1976)

    work page 1976

  52. [52]

    Majid,Algebraic approach to quantum gravity II: Noncommutative spacetime, inApproaches to quantum gravity: Toward a new understanding of space, time and matter, edited by D

    S. Majid,Algebraic approach to quantum gravity II: Noncommutative spacetime, inApproaches to quantum gravity: Toward a new understanding of space, time and matter, edited by D. Oriti (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009)

    work page 2009

  53. [53]

    Wohlgenannt, Non-commutative geometry and physics, Ukr

    M. Wohlgenannt, Non-commutative geometry and physics, Ukr. J. Phys.55, 5 (2010)

    work page 2010

  54. [54]

    Lizzi, M

    F. Lizzi, M. Manfredonia, F. Mercati, and T. Poulain, Phys. Rev. D99, 085003 (2019)

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    Girelli, E

    F. Girelli, E. R. Livine, and D. Oriti, Deformed special relativity as an effective flat limit of quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B708, 411 (2005)

    work page 2005

  56. [56]

    Nandi, A

    P. Nandi, A. Chakraborty, S.K. Pal, B. Chakraborty, and F.G. Scholtz, Symmetries ofκ-Minkowski space- time: a possibility of exotic momentum space geome- try?, J. High Energ. Phys.2023, 142 (2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    Born, Reciprocity theory of elementary particles, Rev

    M. Born, Reciprocity theory of elementary particles, Rev. Mod. Phys.21, 463 (1949)

    work page 1949

  58. [58]

    C. C. Perelman, Born’s reciprocal relativity theory, curved phase space, Finsler geometry and the cosmo- logical constant, Ann. Phys.416, 168143 (2020)

    work page 2020

  59. [59]

    Barger, J.G

    V. Barger, J.G. Learned, S. Pakvasa, and T.J. Weiler, Neutrino decay as an explanation of atmospheric neu- trino observations, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 2640 (1999)

    work page 1999

  60. [60]

    Amelino-Camelia, L

    G. Amelino-Camelia, L. Smolin, and A. Starodubt- sev, Quantum symmetry, the cosmological constant and Planck scale phenomenology, Class. Quantum Grav.21, 3095 (2004)

    work page 2004

  61. [61]

    Lukierski, H

    J. Lukierski, H. Ruegg and W. R¨ uhl, Fromκ-Poincar´ e algebra toκ-Lorentz quasigroup. A deformation of rel- ativistic symmetry, Phys. Lett. B313, 357 (1993)

    work page 1993

  62. [62]

    Livine and D

    E R. Livine and D. Oriti, About Lorentz invariance in a discrete quantum setting, J. High Energ. Phys.2004, 050 (2004)

    work page 2004

  63. [63]

    R. H. Sanders and S. S. McGaugh, Modified Newtonian dynamics as an alternative to dark matter, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.40, 263 (2002)

    work page 2002

  64. [64]

    Lizzi, M

    F. Lizzi, M. Manfredonia, and F. Mercati, The momen- tum spaces ofκ-Minkowski noncommutative spacetime, Nucl. Phys. B958, 115117 (2020). 14

    work page 2020

  65. [65]

    T. R. Govindarajan, K. S. Gupta, E. Harikumar, S. Meljanac, and D. Meljanac, Deformed oscillator alge- bras and QFT inκ-Minkowski Spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 80, 025014 (2009)

    work page 2009

  66. [66]

    Harikumar, T

    E. Harikumar, T. Juri´ c, and S. Meljanac, Electrody- namics onκ-Minkowski space-time, Phys. Rev. D,84, 085020 (2011)

    work page 2011

  67. [67]

    Bosso, On the quasi-position representation in the- ories with a minimal length, Class

    P. Bosso, On the quasi-position representation in the- ories with a minimal length, Class. Quant. Grav.38, 075021 (2021)

    work page 2021

  68. [68]

    Bosso and G

    P. Bosso and G. G. Luciano, Generalized uncertainty principle: from the harmonic oscillator to a QFT toy model, Eur. Phys. J. C,81, 982, (2021)

    work page 2021

  69. [69]

    Harikumar, T

    E. Harikumar, T. Juri´ c, and S. Meljanac, Geodesic equation inκ-Minkowski spacetime, Phys. Rev. D86, 045002 (2012)

    work page 2012

  70. [70]

    F. J. Dyson, Feynman’s proof of the Maxwell equations, Am. J. Phys.58, 209 (1990)

    work page 1990

  71. [71]

    Tanimura, Relativistic generalization and extension to the non-Abelian gauge theory of Feynman’s proof of the Maxwell equations, Ann

    S. Tanimura, Relativistic generalization and extension to the non-Abelian gauge theory of Feynman’s proof of the Maxwell equations, Ann. Phys.220, 229 (1992)

    work page 1992

  72. [72]

    Rovelli and L

    C. Rovelli and L. Smolin, Spin networks and quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D52, 5743 (1995)

    work page 1995

  73. [73]

    G’t Hooft, Deterministic quantum mechanics, Fundam. Theor. Phys.185, 49 (2006)

    work page 2006

  74. [74]

    Al-Nasrallah, S

    E. Al-Nasrallah, S. Das, F. Illuminati, L. Petruzziello, and E. C. Vagenas, Discriminating quantum gravity models by gravitational decoherence, Nucl. Phys. B 992, 116246 (2023)

    work page 2023

  75. [75]

    Donadi and M

    S. Donadi and M. Fadel, Quantum gravitational deco- herence of a mechanical oscillator from spacetime fluc- tuations, Phys. Rev. D111, 026009 (2025)

    work page 2025

  76. [76]

    Benatti and R

    F. Benatti and R. Floreanini, Open system approach to neutrino oscillations, J. High Energ. Phys.2000, 032, (2000)

    work page 2000

  77. [77]

    Ghosh and B

    D. Ghosh and B. R. Majhi, Influence of thermal bath on Pancharatnam-Berry phase in an accelerated frame, Phys. Lett. B858, 139015 (2024)

    work page 2024

  78. [78]

    Kayser, On the quantum mechanics of neutrino os- cillation, Phys

    B. Kayser, On the quantum mechanics of neutrino os- cillation, Phys. Rev. D24, 110 (1981)

    work page 1981

  79. [79]

    R. N. Mohapatra and P. B. Pal,Massive Neutrinos in Physics and Astrophysics(World Scientific Lecture Notes in Physics: Vol 72, Singapore, 1991)

    work page 1991

  80. [80]

    R. L. Workmanet al. (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.2022, 083C01 (2022)

    work page 2022

Showing first 80 references.