REVIEW 3 cited by
Lost in Multilinguality: Dissecting Cross-lingual Factual Inconsistency in Transformer Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Lost in Multilinguality: Dissecting Cross-lingual Factual Inconsistency in Transformer Language Models
read the original abstract
Multilingual language models (MLMs) store factual knowledge across languages but often struggle to provide consistent responses to semantically equivalent prompts in different languages. While previous studies point out this cross-lingual inconsistency issue, the underlying causes remain unexplored. In this work, we use mechanistic interpretability methods to investigate cross-lingual inconsistencies in MLMs. We find that MLMs encode knowledge in a language-independent concept space through most layers, and only transition to language-specific spaces in the final layers. Failures during the language transition often result in incorrect predictions in the target language, even when the answers are correct in other languages. To mitigate this inconsistency issue, we propose a linear shortcut method that bypasses computations in the final layers, enhancing both prediction accuracy and cross-lingual consistency. Our findings shed light on the internal mechanisms of MLMs and provide a lightweight, effective strategy for producing more consistent factual outputs.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Inference-Time Steering for Cross-Lingual Factual Consistency in LLMs
Persona prompting beats CAA steering and DPO adapters at making an English-prompted LLM match its own German, Spanish, and Bulgarian answer distributions, and transfers better to cultural scenarios.
-
Rethinking Cross-lingual Gaps from a Statistical Viewpoint
Cross-lingual accuracy gaps in LLMs are dominated by higher response variance in target languages, not missing knowledge; ensembling and variance-reduction prompts shrink the gap.
-
Different types of syntactic agreement recruit the same units within large language models
Different types of syntactic agreement recruit overlapping units within LLMs, indicating that agreement forms a meaningful functional category across English, Russian, Chinese, and structurally similar languages.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.