Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Red Supergiant problem viewed from the nebular phase spectroscopy of type II supernovae

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.14502 v1 pith:IGBHLT7Q submitted 2025-04-20 astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords problemmassprogenitorsdistributionluminosityodotpre-snsigma
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The red supergiant (RSG) problem refers to the observed dearth of luminous RSGs identified as progenitors of Type II supernovae (SNe II) in pre-SN imaging. Understanding this phenomenon is essential for studying pre-SN mass loss and the explodability of core-collapse SNe. In this work, we re-assess the RSG problem using late-phase spectroscopy of a sample of 50 SNe II. The [O I] $\lambda\lambda$6300,6363 emission in the spectra is employed to infer the zero-age main sequence (ZAMS) mass distribution of the progenitors, which is then transformed into a luminosity distribution via an observation-calibrated mass-luminosity relation. The resulting luminosity distribution reveals an upper cutoff at log $L/L_{\odot} = 5.21^{+0.09}_{-0.07}$ dex, and the RSG problem is statistically significant at the 2$\sigma$ to 3$\sigma$ level. Assuming single RSG progenitors that follow the mass-luminosity relation of KEPLER models, this luminosity cutoff corresponds to an upper ZAMS mass limit of $20.63^{+2.42}_{-1.64}$ $M_{\odot}$. Comparisons with independent measurements, including pre-SN imaging and plateau-phase light curve modeling, consistently yield an upper ZAMS mass limit below about 25 $M_{\odot}$, with a significance level of 1-3$\sigma$. While each individual method provides only marginal significance, the consistency across multiple methodologies suggests that the lack of luminous RSG progenitors may reflect a genuine physical problem. Finally, we discuss several scenarios to account for this issue should it be confirmed as a true manifestation of stellar physics.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SN 2022acko and the Properties of its Red Supergiant Progenitor: Direct Detection, Light Curves, and Nebular Spectroscopy

    astro-ph.HE 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The progenitor mass of SN 2022acko inferred from pre-explosion images (7.5 Msun) disagrees with masses from light-curve and spectral modeling (9-15 Msun), with the tension likely caused by model and calibration systematics.

  2. SN 2022xus: bridging the gap between Type IIP and IIL supernovae

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    SN 2022xus is a transitional Type II supernova with a 94.8-day plateau, a decline rate of 1.23 mag per 100 days, mixed IIP/IIL spectral features, and a likely 12-15 solar-mass progenitor.

Pith tools