Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

DeBiasMe: De-biasing Human-AI Interactions with Metacognitive AIED (AI in Education) Interventions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.16770 v1 pith:PTCLHDUP submitted 2025-04-23 cs.HC

DeBiasMe: De-biasing Human-AI Interactions with Metacognitive AIED (AI in Education) Interventions

classification cs.HC
keywords biasesbiasframeworkshumanhuman-aiinteractioninteractionsinterventions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

While generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) increasingly transforms academic environments, a critical gap exists in understanding and mitigating human biases in AI interactions, such as anchoring and confirmation bias. This position paper advocates for metacognitive AI literacy interventions to help university students critically engage with AI and address biases across the Human-AI interaction workflows. The paper presents the importance of considering (1) metacognitive support with deliberate friction focusing on human bias; (2) bi-directional Human-AI interaction intervention addressing both input formulation and output interpretation; and (3) adaptive scaffolding that responds to diverse user engagement patterns. These frameworks are illustrated through ongoing work on "DeBiasMe," AIED (AI in Education) interventions designed to enhance awareness of cognitive biases while empowering user agency in AI interactions. The paper invites multiple stakeholders to engage in discussions on design and evaluation methods for scaffolding mechanisms, bias visualization, and analysis frameworks. This position contributes to the emerging field of AI-augmented learning by emphasizing the critical role of metacognition in helping students navigate the complex interaction between human, statistical, and systemic biases in AI use while highlighting how cognitive adaptation to AI systems must be explicitly integrated into comprehensive AI literacy frameworks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AdaPT: Adaptive Lesson Plan Transformer for Cross-Regional and Differentiated Instruction

    cs.HC 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    AdaPT is an LLM-powered interactive tool for adapting lesson plans to cross-regional and differentiated instruction, evaluated via a user study with 9 teachers and 3 experts showing workflow support.